green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Aeilts
See United States v. Carlson, 617 F.2d 518 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1010 , 101 S.Ct. 564 , 66 L.Ed.2d 468 (1980).
examined
Cited "see"
Hood v. State
(4×)
See Mc-Donald v. State, 597 S.W.2d 365, 367 (Tex. *92 Crim.App.), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 1010 , 101 S.Ct. 564 , 66 L.Ed.2d 467 (1980); Skillern v. State, 559 S.W.2d 828 (Tex.Crim.App. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carl L. Poschwatta
See United States v. Carlson, 617 F.2d 518, 523 (9th Cir.) (defendant’s good faith assertion of an invalid Fifth Amendment claim would defeat section 7203 requirement of willfulness), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 1010 , 101 S.Ct. 564 , 66 L.Ed.2d 468 (1980).
examined
Cited "see"
Harris v. State
(4×)
See McDonald v. State, 597 S.W.2d 365 (Tex.Cr.App.1980), cer t. denied 449 U.S. 1010 ,, 101 S.Ct. 564 , 66 L.Ed.2d 467 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Virgilio Patricio Flores
(2×)
See United States v. Carlson, 617 F.2d 518, 521 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1010 , 101 S.Ct. 564 , 66 L.Ed.2d 468 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ted Smith
(2×)
See United States v. Carlson, 617 F.2d 518, 523 (CA9), cert. denied 449 U.S. 1010 , 101 S.Ct. 564 , 66 L.Ed.2d 468 (1980); Garner v. United States, 424 U.S. 648 , 662-63 & n. 18, 96 S.Ct. 1178 , 1186-87 & n. 18, 47 L.Ed.2d 370 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Kelley
See People v. Creach (1980), 79 Ill. 2d 96, 101 , 402 N.E.2d 228 , cert. denied (1980), 449 U.S. 1010 , 66 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Grabinski
See United States v. Carlson, 617 F.2d 518, 520-23 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1010 , 101 S.Ct. 564 , 66 L.Ed.2d 468 (1980). 17 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas E. Verkuilen
See generally United States v. Carlson, 617 F.2d 518 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1010 , 101 S.Ct. 564 , 66 L.Ed.2d 468 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kleier Advertising, Inc. v. Premier Pontiac, Inc.
(2×)
Co., 146 Okl. 150 , 293 P. 1073 (1930)), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1006 , 104 S.Ct. 1000 , 79 L.Ed.2d 232 (1984); see also Akins v. Altus Newspapers, Inc., 609 P.2d 1263 (Okla.1977), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1010 , 101 S.Ct. 564 , 66 L.Ed.2d 467 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kleier Advertising, Inc. v. Premier Pontiac, Inc.
(2×)
Co., 146 Okl. 150 , 293 P. 1073 (1930)), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1006 , 104 S.Ct. 1000 , 79 L.Ed.2d 232 (1984); see also Akins v. Altus Newspapers, Inc., 609 P.2d 1263 (Okla.1977), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1010 , 101 S.Ct. 564 , 66 L.Ed.2d 467 (1980). 60 Whether an article is libelous per se is a question of law for the court rather than the jury to decide. 8 Id. at 247; see also Nichols v. Bristow Publishing Co., 330 P.2d 1044, 1045 (Okla.1957) (citing McKenney, 141 P. at 780). " 'Per se' means by itself, and without innuendo." Nichols, 330 P.2d at 1045 (citing Tulsa Tribune Co. v. Kight, 174 Ok…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Altus Newspapers, Inc., dba Altus Times Democrat
v.
Akins
v.
Akins
No. 80-151.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 1980.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Okla. Certiorari denied.