green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1981 ·
…it is axiomatic that a jury verdict cannot be impeached by evidence of intrinsic as opposed to extrinsic influences on juror deliberations
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Cargo Service Stations, Inc., T. D. McRae Incorporated, United Petroleum, Inc., Cargo Gasoline Co., Eastern Oil Company
(2×)
it is axiomatic that a jury verdict cannot be impeached by evidence of intrinsic as opposed to extrinsic influences on juror deliberations
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Oscar Martinez-Moncivais
(2×)
See United States v. Duzac, 622 F.2d 911, 913 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980).
examined
Cited "see"
Nichols v. Busse
(4×)
Accord, United States v. Duzac, 622 F.2d 911 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S. Ct. 570 , 66 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Drywall Tapers And Pointers Of Greater New York, Local 1974 Of I.B.P.A.T. v. Local 530 Of Operative Plasterers And Cement Masons International Association
(2×)
See Arlinghaus v. Ritenour, 622 F.2d 629, 638 (2d Cir.) (citing Cold Metal Process Co. v. McLouth Steel Corp., 126 F.2d 185, 189 (6th Cir.1942) (dictum)), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Drywall Tapers & Pointers of Greater New York, Local 1974 of I.B.P.A.T. v. Local 530 of Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons International Ass'n
(2×)
See Arlinghaus v. Ritenour, 622 F.2d 629, 638 (2d Cir.) (citing Cold Metal Process Co. v. McLouth Steel Corp., 126 F.2d 185, 189 (6th Cir.1942) (dictum)), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bowman v. Board of Regents
(2×)
See generally Arlinghaus v. Ritenour, 622 F.2d 629 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Caballero v. Anselmo
(2×)
See Arlinghaus v. Ritenour, 622 F.2d 629 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980); Bridge C.A.T.
cited
Cited "see"
Consolidated Gold Fields, PLC v. Anglo American Corp. of South Africa Ltd.
See, SEC v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 629 62, 67 n. 4 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 449 1012, 101 S.Ct. 569 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles J. Krall
(2×)
See United States v. Duzac, 622 F.2d 911, 913 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980); Martinez, 658 F.2d at 374 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bridge C.A.T. Scan Associates v. Ohio-Nuclear Inc.
(2×)
See Arlinghaus v. Ritenour, 622 F.2d 629 , 639 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980); Danahy v. Meese, 84 A.D.2d 670, 672 , 446 N.Y.S.2d 611, 614 (4th Dep’t 1981). 12 . 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (c) (1982). 13 . 741 F.2d 482, 496 (2d Cir.1984), ce rt. granted, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 901 , 83 L.Ed.2d 917 (1985). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Strobl v. New York Mercantile Exchange
(2×)
See Arlinghaus v. Ritenour, 622 F.2d 629, 639 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Lee
(2×)
Bailey, supra), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 3311 , 92 L.Ed.2d 724 (1986); see also Arlinghaus v. Ritenour, 622 F.2d 629, 638 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Windsor Plumbing Supply Co., Inc.
(2×)
Kashi v. Gratsos, 790 F.2d 1050,1055 (2d Cir.1986) (quoting Von [Vbra] Lehn v. Astor Art Galleries, Ltd. [ 86 Misc.2d 1 ], 426 [380] N.Y.S.2d 208, 210 [532, 538] (Sup.Ct.1980 [1976])); See also Arlilnghaus v. Ritenour, 622 F.2d 629 , 639 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Laguarta
(2×)
Bailey, supra), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 3311 , 92 L.Ed.2d 724 (1986); see also Arlinghaus v. Ritenour, 622 F.2d 629, 638 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Julio S. Laguarta
(2×)
Bailey, supra ), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1010 , 106 S.Ct. 3311 , 92 L.Ed.2d 724 (1986); see also Arlinghaus v. Ritenour, 622 F.2d 629, 638 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Pierce
(4×)
See, e.g., United States v. Duzac, 622 F.2d 911, 913 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Irving Kas v. Financial General Bankshares, Inc.
See, e.g., SEC v. Falstaff Brewing Corp„ 629 F.2d 62 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 569 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980); Goldberg v. Meridor, 567 F.2d 209 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1069 , 98 S.Ct. 1249 , 55 L.Ed.2d 771 (1978). *513 Santa Fe requires a court to distinguish between an actionable omission or misrepresentation of a material fact and a claim solely for breach of a state-law fiduciary duty.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
38 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1509, 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,500 Joann Ford Box v. A & P Tea Company, Paula Brockhouse v. A & P Tea Company, Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America, Local 320 and International Brotherhood of Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America
(2×)
See Charbonnages de France v. Smith, 597 F.2d 406 , 416 n. 9 (4th Cir.1979); see also Arlinghaus v. Ritenour, 622 F.2d 629, 638 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Box v. A & P Tea Co.
(2×)
See Charbonnages de France v. Smith, 597 F.2d 406 , 416 n. 9 (4th Cir.1979); see also Arlinghaus v. Ritenour, 622 F.2d 629, 638 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mendell v. Greenberg
See, e.g., SEC v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 629 F.2d 62, 68 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 569 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980); *1552 Yamamoto v. Omiya, 564 F.2d 1319, 1323 (9th Cir.1977); Lewis v. Byrnes, 538 F.Supp. 1221, 1224 (S.D.N.Y.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arthur B. Avery, Sr., Alisa D. Avery
(2×)
See also United States v. Duzac, 622 F.2d 911, 913 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980). 1.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Lloyd Eugene Brofford v. Ronald C. Marshall
(4×)
See, e.g., United States v. Duzac, 622 F.2d 911, 913 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jerome Berardi
(2×)
See also United States v. Duzac, 622 F.2d 911 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980) (proper to join perjury count with count charging wilful deprivation of civil rights where perjurious statements were made before a grand jury investigating the civil rights charge). 12 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Burleson
v.
Howard
v.
Howard
No. 80-491.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (2)
Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.