green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
14.1 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Wesley Willie
(2×)
reliance on advice of counsel in tax evasion cases is not a complete defense, but only a circumstance indicating good faith which the trier of fact is allowed to consider on the issue of willfulness
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Cargo Service Stations, Inc., T. D. McRae Incorporated, United Petroleum, Inc., Cargo Gasoline Co., Eastern Oil Company
it is axiomatic that a jury verdict cannot be impeached by evidence of intrinsic as opposed to extrinsic influences on juror deliberations
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sampson
See United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 879-80 (9th Cir.1980) (Kennedy, J.) (considering new possible grounds for bias or prejudice, but declining to consider grounds to which no objection was made previously), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Birinyi
See United States v. Weninger (C.A.10, 1980), 624 F.2d 163, 164 , certiorari denied (1980), 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , citing Von Moltke v. Gillies (1948), 332 U.S. 708, 723-24 , 68 S.Ct. 316, 323 .
cited
Cited "see"
Disability Advocates & Counseling Group, Inc. v. Betancourt
See United States v. Conforte, 457 F.Supp. 641, 652 (D.Nev.1978), aff'd, 624 F.2d 869 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980); see also Jonathan L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. D'Armond
See United States v. Olson, 961 F.2d 221 , 1992 WL 78081 (10th Cir.1992) (“A defendant’s right to counsel does not imply the absolute right to counsel who agrees with Defendant’s views of the tax laws.”) (citing United States v. Weninger, 624 F.2d 163, 166 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillips
See United States v. Conforte, 457 F.Supp. 641, 652 (D.Nev.1978), aff'd, 624 F.2d 869 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980); see also Jonathan L.
cited
Cited "see"
ca9 1995
See United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 879 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980). 19 C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sarno
See United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 879 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980). 19 C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Clay v. Brown, Hopkins & Stambaugh
See United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 879 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980); United States v. Foddrell, 523 F.2d 86 , 87 n. 2 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied 423 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 370 , 46 L.Ed.2d 286 (1975); Delesdernier v. Porterie, 666 F.2d 116, 121 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 459 U.S. 839 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Oscar Martinez-Moncivais
See United States v. Duzac, 622 F.2d 911, 913 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martinez-Moncivais
See United States v. Duzac, 622 F.2d 911, 913 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nichols v. Busse
(2×)
Accord, United States v. Duzac, 622 F.2d 911 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bernard J. Atkinson
See United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 877 (9th Cir.) (advice of counsel defense), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. Bradford Nat. Life Ins. Co.
See United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 879 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 (1980). 21 Stanwyck acknowledges in his argument that he knew during the trial of the facts supporting his argument for the recusal of the district judge.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Neil T. Nordbrock, United States of America v. Evelyn R. Nordbrock
See United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 877 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Samuel Waller
See United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 881 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patricia L. Preston La Juan M. Mitchell Leonard Jamar Preston v. United States
Section 455(b) also describes situations that create an apparent conflict, because it provides examples of situations in which a judge’s ‘impartiality might reasonably be questioned’ pursuant to section 455(a): See United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 880-81 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. H. Wailen York
See United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 880 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980)); In re International Business Machs.
examined
Cited "see"
State Bar of Nevada v. Claiborne
(7×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kevin Elwood Krzyske
(2×)
See United States v. Weninger, 624 F.2d 163 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980); United States v. Romero, 640 F.2d 1014, 1016 (9th Cir.1981). 25 Even if Krzyske did decide to seek counsel following his meeting with the magistrate, we conclude he had enough time to seek an attorney and still be effectively represented.
cited
Cited "see"
Herrington v. County of Sonoma
See United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 880-81 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980). 55 Actual bias is a per se ground for disqualification.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence Sarsoun
(2×)
See United States v. Weninger, 624 F.2d 163 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980) (implied waiver of right to counsel where defendant failed to obtain counsel after repeated urging by trial court).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles J. Krall
See United States v. Duzac, 622 F.2d 911, 913 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980); Martinez, 658 F.2d at 374 .
cited
Cited "see"
Herrington v. County of Sonoma
See United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 880-81 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Duke v. Pfizer, Inc., Div. of Pfizer Hosp.
See United States v. Conforte, 457 F.Supp. 641, 656 (D.Nev.1978), aff'd, 624 F.2d 869 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Everette A. Bohrer
See United States v. Weninger, 624 F.2d 163, 167 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Nevada Pay TV v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada
See United States v. Conforte, 457 F.Supp. 641 , 654 n. 7 (D.Nev. 1978), aff’d, 624 F.2d 869 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Peter Balistrieri, Steve Disalvo, and Dennis Librizzi, Defendants
See United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 881 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Smith
(2×)
The evidence supports the jury's implicit conclusion defendant benefited and had income by receiving *1172 stock, and whether he personally benefited from his use of that stock is not the issue. [43] (64a) Was the Defense of Reliance Established as a Matter of Law? (65a) "It is a valid defense to a charge of filing a false return if a defendant provides full information regarding his taxable income and expenses to an accountant qualified to prepare... tax returns, and that the defendant adopts and files the return as prepared without having reason to believe that it is incorrect." ( United Sta…
cited
Cited "see"
Salmeron v. United States
See United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Salmeron v. United States
See United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980)
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carla Florentine Hines, Leroy Dale Hines, Robert E. Woolverton, Anna Mae Hines, and Anthony A. Cassel
See United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 879-80 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980), (whether timeliness is required is a matter of the peculiar circumstances involved).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hall v. Small Business Administration
See United States v. Conforte, 457 F.Supp. 641, 653 (D.Nev.1978) (party must raise recusal issue at earliest moment after discovering facts), aff’d, 624 F.2d 869, 880 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hall v. Small Business Administration
See United States v. Conforte, 457 F.Supp. 641, 653 (D.Nev.1978) (party must raise recusal issue at earliest moment after discovering facts), aff'd, 624 F.2d 869, 880 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marcus T. Baumann v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 879 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980); United States v. Ellison, 557 F.2d 128, 133 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 965 , 98 S.Ct. 504 , 54 L.Ed.2d 450 (1977); United States v. Maestas, 523 F.2d 316, 320 (10th Cir. 1975); United States v. Bujese, 371 F.2d 120, 125 (3d Cir. 1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Tavares
See United States v. Duzac, 622 F.2d 911, 913 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 (1980); Smith v. Brewer, 444 F. Supp. 482 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James W. Alverson
(2×)
For example, a sentence will be vacated if the judge considered "false or unreliable information," if the information was "demonstrably made the basis for the sentence." Farrow v. United States, 580 F.2d 1339, 1359 (9th Cir. 1978) (en banc ); see United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 883 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
(2×)
The test may be stated in terms of whether the judge's mind is `irrevocably closed' on the issues as they arise in the context of the specific case."), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985); Assn. of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, 627 F.2d 1151, 1174 (D.C.Cir.1979) ("[a]dministrators, and even judges, may hold policy views on questions of law prior to participating in a proceeding"), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 3011 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1113 (1980); see also United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 882 (9th Cir.) ("judge's views on leg…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salemme
See also United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 881 (9th Cir.) (Kennedy, J.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Falu-Gonzalez
See also United States v. Draper, 746 F.2d 662, 665 (10th Cir.1984), citing United States v. Weninger, 624 F.2d 163, 167 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael K. POLAND, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry STEWART, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee
See also United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 882 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980) (a judge’s views on legal issues may not serve as a basis for motions to disqualify).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Liteky v. United States
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Conforte, 624 F. 2d 869, 878-881 (CA9), cert. denied, 449 U. S. 1012 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stephen Yagman v. Republic Insurance Cna Insurance Valley Forge Insurance
Under both statutes, recusal is appropriate where “a reasonable person with knowledge of all the facts would conclude that the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” In re Yagman, 796 F.2d at 1179 (applying section 455); see also United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 880-81 (9th Cir.) (discussing standard for disqualification under sections 144 and 455), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Pierce
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Duzac, 622 F.2d 911, 913 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 570 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Polaroid Corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Petitioner
See, e.g., United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 879 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980). 10 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Potter v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Weninger, 624 F.2d 163, 166-67 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Irving Kas v. Financial General Bankshares, Inc.
See, e.g., SEC v. Falstaff Brewing Corp„ 629 F.2d 62 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 569 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980); Goldberg v. Meridor, 567 F.2d 209 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1069 , 98 S.Ct. 1249 , 55 L.Ed.2d 771 (1978). *513 Santa Fe requires a court to distinguish between an actionable omission or misrepresentation of a material fact and a claim solely for breach of a state-law fiduciary duty.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Crowder v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Weninger, 624 F.2d 163, 167 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980); United States v. Gates, 557 F.2d 1086, 1088 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1017 , 98 S.Ct. 737 , 54 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978); United States v. Terry, 449 F.2d 727 , *657 728 (5th Cir.1971); Glenn v. United States, 303 F.2d 536, 541 (5th Cir.1962); United States v. Arlen, 252 F.2d 491, 494-95 (2d Cir.1958); Spevak v. United States, 158 F.2d 594, 597 (4th Cir.1946), cert. denied, 330 U.S. 821 , 67 S.Ct. 771 , 91 L.Ed. 1272 (1947); People v. Guice, 83 Ill.App…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mendell v. Greenberg
See, e.g., SEC v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 629 F.2d 62, 68 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 569 , 66 L.Ed.2d 471 (1980); *1552 Yamamoto v. Omiya, 564 F.2d 1319, 1323 (9th Cir.1977); Lewis v. Byrnes, 538 F.Supp. 1221, 1224 (S.D.N.Y.1982).
Conforte et ux.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-399.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 1980.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (2) · Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.