green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.1 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Jane Heslinga Cook v. G.D. Searle & Co., Inc., Dr. Brian Donaldson, Dr. David E. Bates
But cf. Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rail,-Barber & Ross, 651 F.2d 687, 691-92 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981) (federal tolling rules apply in fraud cases under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 where federal court applies state limitation in absence of federal limitation). 5 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Iron Workers Local Union No. 17 Insurance Fund v. Philip Morris Inc.
á trial court should not grant summary judgment for a defendant if there is a viable issue of fact' as to when the limitations period began.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.
generally speaking, 'state of the art' refers to customary practice in the industry
discussed
Cited "see"
Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia
(2×)
See Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. Day, 594 P.2d 38, 46-47 (Alaska 1979), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 894 , 102 S.Ct. 391 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981); Masaki v. General Motors Corp., 71 Haw. 1, 9-11 , 780 P.2d 566, 571-572 (1989); Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 297 N.W.2d 727, 732 (Minn.), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Keogh v. W.R. Grasle, Inc.
See Sturm, Ruger & Co. v. Day, 594 P.2d 38, 45 (Alaska 1979), modified on other grounds, 615 P.2d 621 (Alaska 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 894 , 102 S.Ct. 391 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981), and overruled on other grounds, Dura Corp., 703 P.2d at 405 n. 5; Beck, 593 P.2d at 887 (“the state of the art, or conformity with industry-wide practices will not protect a manufacturer from liability”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnston v. CIGNA Corp.
See State of Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 472 F.Supp. 402, 405 (D.Colo.1979), aff'd on other grounds, 651 F.2d 687, 691 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Goichman v. City of Aspen
See Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rail, Barber & Ross, 585 F.2d 454 (10th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Goichman v. City of Aspen
See Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 585 F.2d 454 (10th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981) 2 Before filing its Answer, Aspen amended its towing and impoundment ordinance to "reaffirm[] and codify[] the City's procedures for providing notices of impoundment and hearings regarding removal and towing and storage fees of impounded vehicles." Record, vol. 2, at 205.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Esperanza Saa, Gabriel Saa, Martha Vega, Luis Andrade
See United States v. Ariza-Ibarra, 651 F.2d 2, 16 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Bath v. Bushkin, Gaims, Gaines and Jonas
See Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rail, Barber & Ross, 651 F.2d 687 , 689 n. 1 (10th Cir.1981) cert. denied 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Burkart Foam, Inc.
See NLRB v. Lyon & Ryan Ford, Inc., 647 F.2d 745, 754 (7th Cir.) ("A strike which is caused in whole or in part by an employer’s unfair labor practice is an unfair labor practice strike.”), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 894 , 102 S.Ct. 391 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Sterling & Esther Jensen v. George M. Snellings, III & Snellings, Breard, Sartor, Inabnett & Trascher, Defendants-Third Party Granada Corp. v. Appalachian Insurance Co., Third Party
See State of Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 651 F.2d 687, 694 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Jensen v. Snellings
See State of Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 651 F.2d 687, 694 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stone v. Fossil Oil & Gas
See State of Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 651 F.2d 687, 692 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981); Houlihan v. Anderson & Stokes, Inc., 434 F.Supp. 1319, 1322-23 (D.D.C.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Indianapolis Mack Sales and Service, Inc.
(2×)
See NLRB v. Lyon & Ryan Ford, Inc., 647 F.2d 745, 752 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 894 , 102 S.Ct. 391 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Riley
Section 11-51-123(1) is identical to section 101 of the Uniform Securities Act. 7B U.L.A. 516 (1985); see Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 472 F.Supp. 402, 405 (D.Colo.1979), aff'd 651 F.2d 687 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981); People v. Terranova, 38 Colo.App. 476 , 480, 563 P.2d 363, 365 (1976).
examined
Cited "see"
Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Accord Sturm, Ruger & Co. v. Day, 594 P.2d 38, 48 (Alaska 1979), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 894 , 102 S.Ct. 391 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981) (vacating a punitive damages award and holding that where plaintiff was awarded $137,750 in compensatory damages, any punitive damages assessed following a new trial were not to exceed $250,000), modified on reh'g., 615 P.2d 621 (Alaska 1980) (original punitive damages award of $2,895,000 reduced to $500,000 instead of $250,000); Hoffman v. Sterling Drug, Inc., 374 F.Supp. 850, 856-57 (M.D.Pa.1974), on remand from 485 F.2d 132 (3d Cir.1973) (applying Pennsylvania …
cited
Cited "see"
Goichman v. City of Aspen
See Ohio v. Peterson, et al, 585 F.2d 454 (10th Cir.1978) cert, denied 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marcelo P. Tapia
See United States v. Ariza-Ibarra, 651 F.2d 2, 14 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981). d.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Del Gaudio
Accord, United States v. Ariza-Ibarra, 651 F.2d 2 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981); United States v. Bullock, 551 F.2d 1377 ; United States v. Acosta, 526 F.2d 670 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 920 , 96 S.Ct. 2625 , 49 L.Ed.2d 373 (1976); United States v. Johnson, 390 F. Supp. 1049 (E.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 525 F.2d 999 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 920 , 96 S.Ct. 1127 , 47 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976). [5] *610 The existence of prejudice, then, is the sine qua non for relief from a discovery violation.
discussed
Cited "see"
Shane v. Rhines
(2×)
See Sturm Ruger & Co. v. Day, 594 P.2d 38, 46 (Alaska 1979), modified on rehearing on other grounds, 615 P.2d 621 (Alaska 1981), modified on further rehearing on other grounds, 627 P.2d 204 (Alaska 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 894 , 102 S.Ct. 391 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981), quoting Bridges v. Alaska Housing Authority, 375 P.2d 696, 702 (Alaska 1962) (“[I]n order to recover punitive or exemplary damages, the plaintiff must prove that the wrongdoer’s conduct was ‘outrageous, such as acts done with malice or bad motives or a reckless indifference to the interests of another.’ ”) Shane, ho…
discussed
Cited "see"
Mosey Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
(2×)
See NLRB v. Lyon & Ryan Ford, Inc., 647 F.2d 745, 750 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 894 , 102 S.Ct. 391 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Garrett Railroad Car & Equipment, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio and Its Local 8089, Intervenor
(2×)
Accord NLRB v. Lyon and Ryan Ford, Inc., 647 F.2d 745 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 894 , 102 S.Ct. 391 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981); NLRB v. Trident Seafoods Corp., 642 F.2d 1148 (9th Cir. 1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dekro v. Stern Bros. & Co.
See Ohio v. Peter *415 son, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 472 F.Supp. 402, 409 (D.Colo.1979) (fraudulent concealment requires “something more”) (Finesilver, J.), aff’d, 651 F.2d 687 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981); Campbell, 498 F.Supp. at 727 (burden of proof is on plaintiffs since the doctrine is in avoidance of the statute of limitations).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bennett
See United States v. Ariza-Ibarra, 651 F.2d 2 (C.A.1, 1981), cert. den., - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Salgado v. Piedmont Capital Corp.
See Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 651 F.2d 687 (10 Cir., 1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Citibank, N.A. v. Williams (In Re Williams)
Michael’s Credit Union, 880 F.2d 579 (1st Cir.1989); see also United States v. Ariza-Ibarra, 651 F.2d 2 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981). 4 An adverse inference *733 may be drawn against a party toward whom the missing-witness is favorably disposed.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Victor Martinez, United States of America v. Hector Vidal, United States of America v. Victor Martinez
Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure § 489 (1982)); see also United States v. Ariza-Ibarra, 651 F.2d 2, 15-16 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hector Torres, Bolivar De Leon, Luis Valenzuela and Secundino De Los Santos
See, e.g., United States v. Ariza-Ibarra, 651 F.2d 2, 15-17 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981) (availability may depend upon a witness’s predisposition towards a party); United States v. Mahone, 537 F.2d 922, 926-27 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1025 , 97 S.Ct. 646 , 50 L.Ed.2d 627 (1976) (local police officer peculiarly within federal government's control); Burgess, 440 F.2d at 232 (informer peculiarly within government’s control); United States v. Jackson, 257 F.2d 41, 43-44 (3d Cir.1958) (government informant not equally available); Unite…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sentry Corporation and Sne Corporation v. Ethel R. Harris, as Trustee Under Trust Agreement Dated March 1, 1973
First, the Supreme Court has previously recognized that federal law governs the issue of tolling in federal equity actions, see Holmberg, 327 U.S. at 395 , 66 S.Ct. at 584 ; see also State of Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rail, Barber & Ross, 651 F.2d 687 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981); Tomera v. Galt, 511 F.2d 504, 509 (7th Cir.1975), a ruling that has been extended by the lower courts to actions at law.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court v. Harris
See also NLRB v. Lyon & Ryan Ford, Inc., 647 F.2d 745, 757 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 894 , 102 S.Ct. 391 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981) (applying Chevron Oil to a decision by an admin istrative agency).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gieringer v. Silverman
See also Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rail, Barber & Ross, 472 F.Supp. 402, 410 (D.Colo. 1979), affirmed, 651 F.2d 687 (10th Cir. 1981) (collected cases at 692 n. 9), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gieringer v. Silverman
See also Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 472 F.Supp. 402, 410 (D.Colo.1979), affirmed, 651 F.2d 687 (10th Cir.1981) (collected cases at 692 n. 9), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Druckenmiller v. United States
See e.g., N.L.RB. v. Lyon & Ryan Ford, Inc., 647 F.2d 745, 757 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 894 , 102 S.Ct. 391 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.
v.
Day
v.
Day
No. 81-143.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1) · N.D. Ohio (1)
Sup. Ct. Alaska. Certiorari denied.