green
Positive treatment
9.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bailey v. United States
The Court of Claims held that it lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the claim, noting that “[t]he contract liability which is enforceable under the Tucker Act consent to suit does not extend to every agreement, understanding, or compact which can semantically be stated in terms of offer and acceptance or meeting of minds.” Id. at 268.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
James H. Sanders v. United States
(2×)
The Court of Claims held that it lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the claim, noting that “[t]he contract liability which is enforceable under the Tucker Act consent to suit does not extend to every agreement, understanding, or compact which can semantically be stated in terms of offer and acceptance or meeting of minds.” Id. at 268.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Moore v. United States
It relies on Kania v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 458 , 650 F.2d 264 (1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981), for the proposition that the Tucker Act “does not extend to every agreement, understanding, or compact which can semantically be stated in terms of offer and acceptance or meeting of minds.” Id. at 268.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sadeghi v. United States
(2×)
See Kania v. United States, 227 Ct. Cl. 458 , 650 F.2d 264, 268 , cert. denied 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jarvis v. United States
(2×)
See Kania v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 458, 467 , 650 F.2d 264, 269 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981); Goolsby v. United States, 21 Cl.Ct. 88, 91-92 (1990); Albemarle Bank & Trust Co. v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 704, 706-07 (1987), aff'd mem., 845 F.2d 1034 , 1988 WL 12104 (Fed.Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Concepcion S. Wabol v. Victorino Villacrusis
See Guam v. Kingsbury, 649 F.2d 740, 742 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Concepcion S. Wabol v. Victorino Villacrusis
See Guam v. Kingsbury, 649 F.2d 740, 742 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hall v. United States
(2×)
Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380, 384 , 68 S.Ct. 1, 3 , 92 L.Ed. 10 (1947); see Kania v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 458 , 650 F.2d 264 , 268 cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981); Walton v. United States, 213 Ct.Cl. 755 , 757 (1977); Consortium Venture Corp. v. United States, 5 Cl.Ct. 47, 49 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Concepcion S. Wabol v. Victorino Villacrusis
See Guam, v. Kingsbury, 649 F.2d 740, 742 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eugene G. Chin v. The United States
(2×)
Nor is there any indication that in developing this postal employee labor relations system, Congress intended to depart from the “well-established principle that, absent specific legislation, federal em-. ployees derive the benefits and emoluments of their positions from appointment rather than from any contractual or quasi-contractual relationship with the government.” Chu v. United States, 773 F.2d 1226, 1229 (Fed.Cir.1985); see Kania v. United States, 650 F.2d 264, 267-68 , 227 Ct.Cl. 458 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lopinson v. United States
(2×)
See Kania v. Unit ed States, 227 Ct.Cl. 458, 465 , 650 F.2d 264, 268 (“The claimant for money damages for breach of an express or implied in fact contract must show that the officer who supposedly made the contract had authority to obligate appropriated funds.” (emphasis supplied)), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981).
examined
Cited "see"
Vu Doc Guong v. The United States
(4×)
See Kania v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 458, 465 , 650 F.2d 264, 268 , (plaintiff cannot prevail without identifying the parties in a breach of contract action), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. United States
(2×)
See Kania v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 458, 464-65 , 650 F.2d 264, 267-68 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981); Shaw v. United States, 226 Ct.Cl. 240, 250-51 , 640 F.2d 1254, 1260 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. A.W.J. (Juvenile)
See People of the Territory of Guam v. Kingsbury, 649 F.2d 740 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981) (jurisdiction based upon interpretation of relevant Guam statutes).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lyons v. United States
(2×)
See Kania v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 458, 464-65 , 650 F.2d 264, 268 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981); Shaw v. United States, 226 Ct.Cl. 240, 250-51 , 640 F.2d 1254, 1260 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. C.G.
See Guam v. Kingsbury, 649 F.2d 740 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981); In Re: Doe, 86 N.M. 37 , 519 P.2d 133 (Ct.App.1974); and the cases cited in both. 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Connolly v. United States
(2×)
See Kania v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl.-,-, 650 F.2d 264, 268 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981); Shaw v. United States, 226 Ct.Cl. -, -, 640 F.2d 1254, 1260 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Braho v. Not Identified
(2×)
See Schweitzer v. United States, 82 Fed.Cl. 592, 596 (2008) (holding that the United States Court of Federal Claims has no authority to entertain challenges to indictments, arrests, prosecutions, convictions, imprisonments, or parole); see also Kania v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 458, 464 , 650 F.2d 264, 268 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jarvis v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Kania v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 458, 466 , 650 F.2d 264, 269 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981); Albemarle Bank and Trust Co. v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 704 (1987), aff'd mem., 845 F.2d 1034 (Fed.Cir. 1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Contel of California, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
Id.; see also Kania v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 458, 465 , 650 F.2d 264, 268 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981) (contractor has burden of proof).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
C.B.C. Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Kania v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 458, 466 , 650 F.2d 264, 269 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981) (“expenses in litigation, whether legal, accounting, secretarial, or other” were not recoverable); Goolsby v. United States, 21 Cl.Ct. 88, 90-91 (1990) (sums expended to defend a collection action, which was instituted as a result of defendant’s alleged bad faith breach of a loan agreement were not recoverable); Mazama Timber Prods., Inc. v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 87, 90 (1984) (litigation funds expended by plaintiff as a result of Government’…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
David C. Barker v. Wayne Estelle, Warden
Id. at 561-562, 86 S.Ct. at 1057 ; see also Guam v. Kingsbury, 649 F.2d 740, 743 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
First National Bank v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Kania v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 458, 465 , 650 F.2d 264, 268 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981); Grismac Corp. v. United States, 214 Ct.Cl. 39 , 556 F.2d 494 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ybarra v. Reno Thunderbird Mobile Home Village
(2×)
See also Silverton v. Department of Treasury, 644 F.2d 1341 , 1345 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981); Delaney v. Giarrusso, 633 F.2d 1126, 1128 (5th Cir.1981 (per curiam) (if habeas corpus is proper, then plaintiff-appellant may also be precluded from raising the issue in the section 1983 action).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ybarra v. Reno Thunderbird Mobile Home Village
(2×)
See also Silverton v. Department of Treasury, 644 F.2d 1341 , 1345 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981); Delaney v. Giarrusso, 633 F.2d 1126, 1128 (5th Cir.1981 (per curiam) (if habeas corpus is proper, then plaintiff-appellant may also be precluded from raising the issue in the section 1983 action).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Henry T. Dart and the Libertarian Party of Louisiana v. James H. Brown, Secretary of State for the State of Louisiana
(2×)
See also Mathers v. Morris, 515 F.Supp. 931, 935-38 (D.Md.), aff'd, 649 F.2d 280 (4th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Constant v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Kania v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 458 , 650 F.2d 264 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 393 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981). 35 U.S.C. § 183 does not specifically provide for the reimbursement of legal or other expenses incurred in contesting secrecy orders, nor does the legislative history indicate that Congress intended to include such expenses within the ambit of damages recoverable under the statute.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Halprin
v.
New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board
v.
New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board
No. 81-227.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1981.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.