green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Vickson v. Singletary
See Ivory v. Wainwright, 393 So.2d 542, 544 (Fla.1980), appeal dismissed, 454 U.S. 806 , 102 S.Ct. 79 , 70 L.Ed.2d 75 (1981); De Veau v. Braisted, 363 U.S. 144, 160 , 80 S.Ct. 1146 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1109 (1960); Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 613-14 , 80 S.Ct. 1367 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1435 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vickson v. Singletary
See Ivory v. Wainwright, 393 So.2d 542, 544 (Fla. 1980), appeal dismissed, 454 U.S. 806 , 102 S.Ct. 79 , 70 L.Ed.2d 75 (1981); De Veau v. Braisted, 363 U.S. 144, 160 , 80 S.Ct. 1146 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1109 (1960); Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 613-14 , 80 S.Ct. 1367 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1435 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Retirement Fund Trust of the Plumbing, Etc. v. Franchise Tax Board
See Standard Oil Co. of California v. Agsalud, 442 F.Supp. 695, 696 (N.D.Cal.1977) (Agsalud I), aff'd, 633 F.2d 760, 762 (9th Cir.1980) (Agsalud II), aff'd, 454 U.S. 801 , 102 S.Ct. 79 , 70 L.Ed.2d 75 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Scott v. State
See Barnett v. State, 615 S.W.2d 220, 222 (Tex.Crim.App.), appeal dismissed, 454 U.S. 806 , 102 S.Ct. 79 , 70 L.Ed.2d 75 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Evans v. State
See Barnett v. State, 615 S.W.2d 220, 222 (Tex.Crim.App.), appeal dism’d, 454 U.S. 806 , 102 S.Ct. 79 , 70 L.Ed.2d 75 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kilmer v. Central Counties Bank
See Standard Oil Co. of California v. Agsalud, 633 F.2d 760 (9th Cir.1980), aff’d, 454 U.S. 801 , 102 S.Ct. 79 , 70 L.Ed.2d 75 (1981); Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Barnes, 571 F.2d 502 (9th Cir.1978) cert. denied, 439 U.S. 831 , 99 S.Ct. 108 , 58 L.Ed.2d 125 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Morgan v. State
See Barnett v. State, (Tex.Cr.App.1981) 615 S.W.2d 220 , dismissed for want of a substantial Federal question, in Barnett v. Texas (1981), 454 U.S. 806 , 102 S.Ct. 79 , 70 L.Ed.2d 75 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
David Austell v. Raymond James & Associates, Incorporated
See, e.g., Standard Oil Co. of Calif, v. Agsalud, 442 F.Supp. 695, 698-99 (N.D.Cal.1977), aff'd, 633 F.2d 760 (9th Cir.1980), aff 'd, 454 U.S. 801 , 102 S.Ct. 79 , 70 L.Ed.2d 75 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martori Bros. Distributors v. James-Massengale
See, e.g., Standard Oil Co. v. Agsalud, 633 F.2d 760 (9th Cir.1980), aff’g 442 F.Supp. 695 (N.D.Cal.1977), aff'd mem. 454 U.S. 801 , 102 S.Ct. 79 , 70 L.Ed.2d 75 (1981) (reporting requirements); Hewlett Packard Co. v. Barnes, 571 F.2d 502 (9th Cir.1978), aff'g 425 F.Supp. 1294 (N.D.Cal.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 831 , 99 S.Ct. 108 , 58 L.Ed.2d 125 (1978) (funding & disclosure requirements); Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. Ilsley, 690 F.2d 323 (2d Cir.1982), aff’d mem. sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barnett
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 81-5101.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1981.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Appeal from Ct. Crim. App. Tex. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.