green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Stout v. Commonwealth
See Pevlor v. Commonwealth, Ky., 638 S.W.2d 272 (1982), cert. denied 459 U.S. 1149 , 103 S.Ct. 794 , 74 L.Ed.2d 998 (1983). 29 . 455 U.S. 745 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982). 30 . 441 U.S. 418 , 99 S.Ct. 1804 , 60 L.Ed.2d 323 (1979). 31 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hipp v. State
(2×)
See Williams v. State, 400 So.2d 542 , 543 n. 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1149 , 103 S.Ct. 793 , 74 L.Ed.2d 998 (1983) (omission of intent element from robbery instruction was not fundamental error in absence of real dispute on that question).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Convenience Store Distributing Co.
(2×)
See Taylor v. State (1982), Ind., 438 N.E.2d 275 , cert. den. (1983) 459 U.S. 1149 , 103 S.Ct. 793 , 74 L.Ed.2d 998 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lawson v. State
(2×)
See Williams v. State, 400 So.2d 542, 545-46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1149 , 103 S.Ct. 793 , 74 L.Ed.2d 998 (1983), and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. State
(2×)
See generally Williams v. State, 400 So.2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), and cases cited at 544-45, cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1149 , 103 S.Ct. 793 , 74 L.Ed.2d 998 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vergara v. State
(2×)
See Williams v. State, 400 So.2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1149 , 103 S.Ct. 793 , 74 L.Ed.2d 998 (1983); Jackson v. State, 251 So.2d 702 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971); Hamilton v. State, 152 So.2d 793 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 156 So.2d 388 (Fla. 1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Slayton v. State
See Harden v. State (1982), Ind., 441 N.E.2d 215 , cert. denied 459 U.S. 1149 , 108 S.Ct. 794 , 74 L.Ed.2d 998 . *1304 The - requisite - showing _- of Wright's hostility as a State's witness was apparent when her testimony was exculpatory of appellant and she stated that her prior statement was not inconsistent.
cited
Cited "see"
Daniel Duane Gilbert v. Al Parke
See Gilbert v. Commonwealth, 637 S.W.2d 632 (Ky.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1149 , 103 S.Ct. 794 , 74 L.Ed.2d 998 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morton v. State
See id. at 544 n. 6 (distinguishing, as inapplicable, the cases which find fundamental error where there is a complete failure to define or explain the crime charged, e.g., Williams, 366 So.2d 817 ). [5] The defense in this case was misidentification where the defendant said, inter alia, that he was not present at the scene of the crime and that he, therefore, could not refute that a robbery had occurred.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dolan v. State
(2×)
See Williams v. State, 400 So.2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), rev. denied, 408 So.2d 1096 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 793 , 74 L.Ed.2d 998 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harrison v. State
(2×)
Compare, e.g., Williams v. State, 400 So.2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1149 , 103 S.Ct. 793 , 74 L.Ed.2d 998 (1983) (no fundamental error in failing to instruct on element of a crime conceded to be present).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hauptmann
v.
Lacey, Judge, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
v.
Lacey, Judge, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
No. 82-5762.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 1983.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.