green
Positive treatment
11.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Christy
(2×)
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263, 1269-70 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Christy
(2×)
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263, 1269-70 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harmon
(2×)
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263, 1269-70 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hernandez-Lopez
(2×)
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263, 1269-70 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Romero
(2×)
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Martinez
(2×)
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263, 1269-70 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Martinez
(2×)
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rey
(2×)
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Moya-Matute
(2×)
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263 (10th Cir.1982). cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Moya-Matute
(2×)
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263 (10th Cir.1982). cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Mikulski
(4×)
It is important to note that “Terry has come to stand for two distinct propositions — an investigative detention (‘stop’) in which a police officer, for the purposes of investigation, may briefly detain a person on less than probable ' cause, ... [citations omitted] and a protective search (‘frisk’) which permits an officer, in the course of an investigative detention, to conduct a limited search for weapons for his or her own protection.” United States v. King, 990 F.2d *1207 1552, 1557 (10th Cir.1993); accord, United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263, 1271 (10th Cir.1982), cert.…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Iris Collette Jackson Dwight Dean Jackson
(2×)
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263, 1269-70 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Susan H. McDougal
(2×)
See Richards v. Solem, 693 F.2d 760, 766 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Larry Dewayne Usher v. Jimmy Jones
(2×)
See Richards v. Solem, 693 F.2d 760, 767 (8th Cir.1982) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Donnell George
(2×)
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263, 1268-70 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983); cf. United States v. Castillo, 866 F.2d 1071, 1077 (9th Cir.1988) (“magistrate may consider hearsay statements in an affidavit in determining whether there is probable cause to believe that a person is guilty of a crime”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George S. Bartley, Jr.
(2×)
See Richards v. Solem, 693 F.2d 760, 766 (8th Cir.1982) cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Berndt v. State
See Williams v. Bordenkircher, 696 F.2d 464 , (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 287 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rhoden
(2×)
See Williams v. Bordenkircher, 696 F.2d 464 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 287 (1983); Pate v. Smith, 637 F.2d 1068, 1072 (6th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas Simmons v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, and Steve Clark, Attorney General, State of Arkansas
(2×)
See Richards v. Solem, 693 F.2d 760, 765 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frances E. King v. Elizabeth H. Dole, Secretary of Transportation
(2×)
Devine v. White, 697 F.2d 421 (D.C.Cir.1983); accord Miller v. United States Postal Service, 685 F.2d 148 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Washington
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F2d 1263, 1274 (10th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 103 S. Ct. 1898 (1983) (brief stop may be rendered arrest by excessive show of force).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Washington
See United States v. Merritt, 695 F2d 1263, 1274 (10th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 103 S. Ct. 1898 (1983) (brief stop may be rendered arrest by excessive show of force).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ricky Lee Newton
(2×)
See also Williams v. Bordenkircher, 696 F.2d 464, 467 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 287 (1983). 4 A defendant is incompetent to stand trial when he does not have "sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding — and whether he has a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him." Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402, 402 , 80 S.Ct. 788 , 4 L.Ed.2d 824 (1960) (internal quotation marks omitted). 50 I believe that Newton's defense counsel's statements on two of the three d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clarence Victor v. Frank X. Hopkins
(2×)
See Castille v. Peoples, 489 U.S. 346, 349 , 109 S.Ct. 1056, 1059 , 103 L.Ed.2d 380 (1989) (“Respondent’s habeas petition should have been dismissed if state remedies had not been exhausted as to any of the federal claims.”); Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 325 , 109 S.Ct. 1060, 1083 , 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989) (Stevens, J., concurring) (“In Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509 , 102 S.Ct. 1198 , 71 L.Ed.2d 379 (1982), the Court announced that a habeas petition containing exhausted and unexhaust-ed claims must be dismissed.”); Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 124 n. 25, 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 1570 n. 25, …
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Czmowski
(4×)
“In assessing police justifications for arrests or intrusions of a type less offensive than full arrests, we take an objective view of all the facts and may evaluate the knowledge of all the officers collectively.” Brewer v. Wolff, 529 F.2d 787, 790 (8th Cir.1976); see also United States v. Merritt, 695 F.2d 1263 (10th Cir.1982) (same principles apply to investigatory stops), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joe C. Long v. United States Department of the Air Force
(2×)
Parissi v. Telechron, Inc., 349 U.S. 46 , 75 S.Ct. 577 , 99 L.Ed. 867 (1955); accord Brennan v. United States Gypsum Co., 330 F.2d 728, 729 (10th Cir.1964) (untimely payment of filing fee did not vitiate validity of notice of appeal when it was received within the thirty day period); see also Miller v. United States Postal Service, 685 F.2d 148, 149 (5th Cir.1982) (petition for review from MSPB’s decision not timely when mailed before expiration of thirty day period, but not received until after expiration of this period), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 286 (1983); …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Groseclose Ex Rel. Harries v. Dutton
See, e.g., Williams v. Bordenkircher, 696 F.2d 464, 466-67 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 , 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 287 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jerome Bowden v. Robert Francis, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
See also Williams v. Bordenkircher, 696 F.2d 464, 465-67 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 1898 , 77 L.Ed.2d 287 (1983); see also, United States v. Oliver, 626 F.2d 254, 258-59 (2d Cir. 1980) (finding of competence upheld because judge had substantial opportunity to observe and question defendant).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Gray Graham v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, and Mark v. Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South Dakota
(2×)
Compare Dunn v. Wyrick, 679 F.2d 731, 733 (8th Cir.1982) (Rose v. Lundy will not be applied to habeas corpus petitions where exhausted claims have been fully litigated and decided in the federal district court prior to the Rose v. Lundy decision), and Romano v. Wyrick, 681 F.2d 555 , 556 & n. 3 (8th Cir.1982) (mixed petition need not be dismissed in its entirety), with Stewart v. Parratt, 682 F.2d 757, 758 (8th Cir.1982) (remanding case to district court to reconsider in light of Rose v. Lundy). 13 This court's most recent opinion on the effect of Rose v. Lundy was Richards v. Solem, 693 F.2d …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Richards
v.
Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary
v.
Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary
No. 82-6205.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 2, 1983.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.