green
Positive treatment
7.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Northwest Financial Acceptance
Appellants' App., Vol. I at 166 (internal quotation marks omitted); see Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 703 F.2d 1152, 1168 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Northwest Financial Acceptance, Inc.
Appellants’ App., Vol. I at 166 (internal quotation marks omitted); see Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 703 F.2d 1152, 1168 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ivan A. Anixter Blanche Dickenson Dolly K. Yoshida, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Home-Stake Production Company, an Oklahoma Corporation Home-Stake 1971 Program Operating Corporation Home-Stake 1970 Program Operating Corporation Home-Stake 1969 Program Operating Corporation Home-Stake 1968 Program Operating Corporation Home-Stake 1967 Program Operating Corporation Home-Stake 1966 Program Operating Corporation Home-Stake 1965 Program Operating Corporation Robert S. Trippet E.M. Kunkel Thomas A. Landrith J.D. Metcalfe H.B. Gutelius H.L. Fitzgerald, and Wynema Anna Cross, of the Estate of Norman C. Cross, Jr., A.M. Anderson Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, as Trustee for Merl McHenry Joseph A. Buda, Arthur Bueche, George V.T. And Helen Burgess Dewey J. Cali William H. Colquhoun S.W. Corbin Robert B. Coburn Vigil B. Day William H. Dennler Mario Dimartino Stella Dimartino John M. Evans Margaret C. Everett Isador H. Finkelstein Joseph H. Gauss H.W. Gouldthorpe Ralph Hart James J. Hayes Earl D. Hilburn Joseph E. Horak Gerald A. Hoyt Richard M. Hurst Ralph Iannucci Emily Iannucci Milton F. Kent Howard Kicherer Elizabeth Kicherer John Kokoszka Millie B. Lassing Joseph Levin Marie F. Levin John D. Lockton Dennis G. Lyons Ferdinand F. McAllister Russell W. McFall James Madden Albert Manganelli Nicholas A. Marchese Stanley A. Marks John G. Martin C.W. Moeller Andrew Overby Carl E. Palermo Frank A. Palermo Roy T. Parker, Jr. Bruce M. Robertson D.D. Scarff M.L. Scarff A.E. Schubert William R. Smart E. Starr Janet G. Stewart Gerald Toomey Paul Townsend Vernon Underwood H.B. Waldron, Jr. Ted B. Westfall v. Home-Stake Production Company, an Oklahoma Corporation Home-Stake 1970 Program Operating Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Robert S. Trippet Harry Heller Simpson Thacher and Bartlett, a Partnership Thomas A. Landrith, Jr. E.M. Kunkel McAfee Taft, Mark, Bond, Rucks, and Woodruff, a Professional Corporation and Its Professional Employees and Attorneys and Partners, Their Successors and Assigns, and Wynema Anna Cross, of the Estate of Norman C. Cross, Jr., A.M. Anderson Richard J. Anton Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, as Trustee for Merl McHenry E.P. Bernuth, Sophie K. Bernuth, Joseph A. Buda, George and Helen Burgess Dewey Cali Robert B. Coburn Coburn & Libby, Inc. Edward v. Coonan S.W. Corbin William H. Dennler Mario Dimartino Stella Dimartino John Evans Margaret C. Everett L.L. Ferguson Isador H. Finkelstein H.W. Gouldthorpe George L. Haller Jack Hanson Ralph Hart F.H. Holt Joseph E. Horak Gerald A. Hoyt Howard G. Kicherer Elizabeth C. Kicherer John Kokoszka Millie B. Lassing Joseph Levin Marie Levin John D. Lockton D.W. Lynch D.B. Lynch Dennis G. Lyons Ferdinand F. McAllister Russell McFall James F. Madden Albert Manganelli Nicholas Marchese Stanley A. Marks C.W. Moeller William H. Mortensen Carl Olson Patricia Olson Carl Palermo Frank Palermo Roy T. Parker Helen M. Reeder D.D. Scarff M.L. Scarff Richard Scott Louis P. Singer William R. Smart J. Stanford Smith G. Curtis Stewart Paul Townsend Vernon Underwood Ted B. Westfall J. Howard Wood Sidney Woolwich Murray Zimmerman v. Home-Stake Production Company, an Oklahoma Corporation Home-Stake 1969 Program Operating Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Robert S. Trippet E.M. Kunkel Thomas A. Landrith, Jr. Harry Heller William Blum Simpson Thacher and Bartlett William D. Lewis Richard A. Ganong Lewis & Ganong, a Partnership, and Wynema Anna Cross, of the Estate of Norman C. Cross, Jr.
See Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 703 F.2d 1152 , 1176 & n. 20 (10th Cir.1981) (en banc) (plurality opinion), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983) (holding that where no objection was made to the charge and there was sufficient evidence to sustain ruling under other theories "any error in submitting the [improper] theory should not now be considered on appeal").
discussed
Cited "see"
Anixter v. Home-Stake Production Co.
See Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 703 F.2d 1152 , 1176 & n. 20 (10th Cir.1981) (en banc) (plurality opinion), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983) (holding that where no objection was made to the charge and there was sufficient evidence to sustain ruling under other theories “any error in submitting the [improper] theory should not now be considered on appeal”).
discussed
Cited "see"
59 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 405, 59 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,672 Bertha E. Mayhue, and Cross-Appellee v. St. Francis Hospital of Wichita, Inc., and Cross-Appellant
See Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 703 F.2d 1152, 1179 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); see also United States v. Cheyenne, 855 F.2d 566, 568 (8th Cir.1988) ("We give substantial weight to the trial court's appraisal of the prejudicial effects of extraneous information on the jury, since the trial judge has the advantages of close observation of the jurors and intimate familiarity with the issues at trial."); Day, 830 F.2d at 1106 (" 'the trial judge ... is in the best position to evaluate the effect of the offending …
discussed
Cited "see"
Mayhue v. St. Francis Hospital of Wichita, Inc.
See Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 703 F.2d 1152, 1179 (10th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); see also United States v. Cheyenne, 855 F.2d 566, 568 (8th Cir.1988) (“We give substantial weight to the trial court’s appraisal of the prejudicial effects of extraneous information on the jury, since the trial judge has the advantages of close observation of the jurors and intimate familiarity with the issues at trial.”); Day, 830 F.2d at 1106 (“‘the trial judge ... is in the best position to evaluate the effect of the …
cited
Cited "see"
Norman G. Kelley, Cross-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck and Company Allstate Life Insurance Company, Cross-Appellees
See Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 703 F.2d 1152, 1168-69 (10th Cir.1981) (en banc) (plurality opinion), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
O'Gilvie v. International Playtex, Inc.
See Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 703 F.2d 1152, 1168 (10th Cir.1981) (en banc) (plurality opinion), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); J.T.
cited
Cited "see"
O'gilvie v. International Playtex, Inc.
See Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 703 F.2d 1152, 1168 (10th Cir.1981) (en banc) (plurality opinion), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); J.T.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bradbury v. Phillips Petroleum Company
See, Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 703 F.2d 1152, 1173-74 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); Holland Furnace Co. v. Robson, 157 Colo. 347 , 402 P.2d 628, 631 (Colo.1965), Restatement (Second) of Agency, Sec. 217C (1957).II. 24 The altercation between Desert Drilling Company personnel and Bradbury in August, 1980, was not the first time landowners in the Placerville area had found reason to complain about the uranium exploration project.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bradbury v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
See, Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 703 F.2d 1152, 1173-74 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); Holland Furnace Co. v. Robson, 157 Colo. 347 , 402 P.2d 628, 631 (Colo.1965), Restatement (Second) of Agency, § 217C (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barbara Ann Alley and W.H. Alley, Cross-Appellees v. Gubser Development Company, National Gypsum Company and Weyerhaeuser Company, Cross-Appellants
See, Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, 703 F.2d 1152, 1177 (10th Cir.1981), *856 cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983) (nature of the act which caused the injury is to be considered.) The Colorado Supreme Court has defined the phrase "wanton and reckless disregard” in the exemplary damage statute as follows: “If, conscious of his conduct and the existing conditions, he [defendant] knew or should have known, that the injury would probably result, the requirements of the statute are met.” Foster v. Redding, 97 Colo. 4 , 45 P.2d 940 -41 (1935) …
discussed
Cited "see"
Higgins v. Martin Marietta Corporation
See Malandris v. Merrill, Lynch, Fenner and Smith, 703 F.2d 1152 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); Miller v. City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, 660 F.2d 450 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982). 50 No manifest error affecting a substantial right of a party is found in the record.
discussed
Cited "see"
Higgins v. Martin Marietta Corp.
See Malandris v. Merrill, Lynch, Fenner and Smith, 703 F.2d 1152 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); Miller v. City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, 660 F.2d 450 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Vaughan Morrill, Jr., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Becton, Dickinson and Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee
See Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 703 F.2d 1152, 1177-78 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); 11 C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Diana L. Mason, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Otis W. Mason, Deceased v. Texaco, Inc.
See also Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 703 F.2d 1152, 1173 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harold W. GRANDCHAMP and Peter J. Seewald, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC., Defendant-Appellant
Under the Restatement, liability may be found only.“where the conduct has been so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in, a civilized community.” Rugg, 476 P.2d at 756 . (quoting Restatement § 46, comment d); see also Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 703 F.2d 1152, 1158-59 (10th Cir.1981) (en banc) (discussing Colorado law), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); Churchey v. Adolph Coors Co., 759 P.2d 1336, 1350 (Colo.1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mattingly, Inc. v. Beatrice Foods Company
See also Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 703 F.2d 1152 , 1175 n. 17 (10th Cir.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983) (actions of a local manager are sufficient under Sec. 909 to impose punitive damages against the employer-corporation where it delegates a great deal of authority to its local branch managers). 121 The trial court's findings and the record demonstrate that the punitive damages award was not in error under the Sec. 909 analysis.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mattingly, Inc. v. Beatrice Foods Co.
See also Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 703 F.2d 1152 , 1175 n. 17 (10th Cir.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 464 U.S, 824, 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983) (actions of a local manager are sufficient under § 909 to impose punitive damages against the employer-corporation where it delegates a great deal of authority to its local branch managers).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Higgs v. DIST. COURT IN AND FOR DOUGLAS CO.
A verdict may not be set aside on grounds of passion, prejudice, or corruption unless the damages are "`so outrageous as to strike everyone with the enormity and injustice of them.'" Burns, 659 P.2d at 1356 ( quoting, Riss & Co., 108 Colo. at 85 , 114 P.2d at 281 ); see also Malandris v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 703 F.2d 1152 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); Snowden v. Matthews, 160 F.2d 130 (10th Cir.1947).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Higgs v. District Court In & For the County of Douglas
A verdict may not be set aside on grounds of passion, prejudice, or corruption unless the damages are “ ‘so outrageous as to strike everyone with the enormity and injustice of them.’ ” Burns, 659 P.2d at 1356 {quoting, Riss & Co., 108 Colo, at 85, 114 P.2d at 281 ); see also Malandris v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 703 F.2d 1152 (10th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); Snowden v. Matthews, 160 F.2d 130 (10th Cir.1947).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aspen Highlands Skiing Corporation v. Aspen Skiing Company
See e.g., Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Lumbert, 401 F.2d 699, 701 (10th Cir.1968) (absent pertinent objection to charge or request for specific interrogatory, a general verdict is upheld where there is substantial evidence supporting any ground of recovery in favor of an appellee); see also Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 703 F.2d 1152 , 1176-77 n. 20 (10th Cir.1981), (en banc) (plurality opinion) cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); Comins v. Scrivener, 214 F.2d 810, 814 (10th Cir.1954).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. v. Aspen Skiing Co.
See, e.g., Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Lumbert, 401 F.2d 699, 701 (10th Cir. 1968) (absent pertinent objection to charge or request for specific interrogatory, a general verdict is upheld where there is substantial evidence supporting any ground of recovery in favor of an appellee); see also Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 703 F.2d 1152 , 1176-77 n. 20 (10th Cir.1981), (en banc) (plurality opinion), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); Comins v. Scrivener, 214 F.2d 810, 814 (10th Cir.1954).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LeCroy v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
See, e.g., Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 703 F.2d 1152 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); Emmons v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 532 F.Supp. 480 (S.D.Ohio 1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hovsepian, aka Hughes
v.
Neff, Independent of the Estate of Lummis
v.
Neff, Independent of the Estate of Lummis
No. 82-2020.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Published
Ct. App. Tex., 14th Sup. Jud. Dist. Certiorari denied.