green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1984 ·
…reasonable or forseeable consequence
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Springs Ambulance Service, Inc. v. City of Rancho Mirage
reasonable or forseeable consequence
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Springs Ambulance Service, Inc. v. City Of Rancho Mirage
reasonable or forseeable consequence
discussed
Cited "see"
Capital Telephone Company, Inc. v. New York Telephone Company
See United States v. Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conf., Inc., 702 F.2d 532 (5th Cir., Unit B. 1983) (en banc), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 3508 , 82 L.Ed.2d 818 (1984) In the Supreme Court's latest consideration of state action immunity, the Court's language indicates that no compulsion requirement should be read into the standard.
cited
Cited "see"
Capital Telephone Co. v. New York Telephone Co.
See United States v. Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conf., Inc., 702 F.2d 532 (5th Cir., Unit B. 1983) (en banc), cert. granted, - U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 3508 , 82 L.Ed.2d 818 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Raiford v. Buslease Inc.
See Byrd v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 726 F.2d 552 (9th Cir.), cert, granted, — U.S —, 104 S.Ct. 3509 , 82 L.Ed.2d 818 (1984); Liskey v. Oppenheimer & Co., 717 F.2d 314 (6th Cir.1983); Dickinson v. Heinold Securities, Inc., 661 F.2d 638 (7th Cir.1981); Lee v. Ply* Gem Industries, Inc., 593 F.2d 1266 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 967 , 99 S.Ct. 2417 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1073 (1979). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,831 Bernice Barbour Raiford, Morgan B. Raiford v. Buslease Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., and Thomas F. Morris, Morgan B. Raiford v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Bernice B. Raiford v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Thomas F. Morris, Defendants
See Byrd v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 726 F.2d 552 (9th Cir.), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 3509 , 82 L.Ed.2d 818 (1984); Liskey v. Oppenheimer & Co., 717 F.2d 314 (6th Cir.1983); Dickinson v. Heinold Securities, Inc., 661 F.2d 638 (7th Cir.1981); Lee v. Ply* Gem Industries, Inc., 593 F.2d 1266 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 967 , 99 S.Ct. 2417 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1073 (1979) 3 Two other Eleventh Circuit cases, Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Haydu, 675 F.2d 1169 (11th Cir.1982) and Ultracashmere House, Ltd. v. Meyer, 664 F.2d 1176 (11th Cir.1981) involve actions that…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Traweek v. City and County of San Francisco
See also Town of Hattie v. City of Eau Claire, 700 F.2d 376, 381 (7th Cir.1983), petition for cert. granted, 467 U.S. 1240 , 104 S.Ct. 3508 , 82 L.Ed.2d 818 (1983). 19 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Catalina Cablevision Associates a Joint Venture v. City of Tucson
See also Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire, 700 F.2d 376, 381 (7th Cir.1983), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 3508 , 82 L.Ed.2d 818 (1984); Century Federal, Inc. v. City of Palo Alto, California, 579 F.Supp. 1553, 1558 (N.D.Cal.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hybud Equipment Corp. v. City of Akron, Ohio
(2×)
See e.g., Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire, 700 F.2d 376 (7th Cir.1983), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 3508 , 82 L.Ed.2d 818 (1984); Central Iowa Refuse System v. Des Moines Metropolitan Solid Waste Agency, 715 F.2d 419 (8th Cir.1983), petition for cert. filed, 52 U.S.L.W. 3441 (U.S. Nov. 18, 1983) (No. 83-825) 2 Two other sections of the Agreement provide: H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brazil v. Arkansas Board of Dental Examiners
See also Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire, 700 F.2d 376, 381 (7th Cir.1983), petition for cert. filed, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 3508 , 82 L.Ed.2d 818 (1983) (if "the state gave the city authority to operate in the area of sewage services and to refuse to provide treatment services then we can assume that the State contemplated that anticompetitive effects might result from conduct pursuant to that authorization.”). 7 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sims
v.
Central Intelligence Agency
v.
Central Intelligence Agency
No. 83-1249.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 11, 1984.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2)
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted, case consolidated with No. 83-1075, CIA v. Sims [certiorari granted, 465 U. S. 1078], and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument.