green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.0 score
“it is not necessary that a plaintiff describe his damages with a great degree of certainty. cer 950 tainty plays a much more important role in the measure of proof necessary to establish the plaintiff had in fact sustained some damage.”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Ryko Manufacturing Co. v. Eden Services, a Maryland Partnership, Fred J. Eden, Jr. And J. Erik Eden, Eden Services, Fred J. Eden, Jr. And J. Erik Eden v. Ryko Manufacturing Co., Ryko Manufacturing Co. v. Eden Services, a Maryland Partnership, Fred J. Eden and J. Erik Eden, Eden Services, Fred J. Eden, Jr. And J. Erik Eden v. Ryko Manufacturing Co.
But cf. McDonald v. Johnson & Johnson, 722 F.2d 1370, 1382 (8th Cir.), modified on reh'g, 722 F.2d at 1388-89 (8th Cir.1983) (requiring retrial of liability and damages on fraud claim where issues of liability and damages were inextricably intertwined), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 870 , 105 S.Ct. 219 , 83 L.Ed.2d 149 (1984).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Ryko Manufacturing Co. v. Eden Services
But cf. McDonald v. Johnson & Johnson, 722 F.2d 1370, 1382 (8th Cir.), modified on reh’g, 722 F.2d at 1388-89 (8th Cir.1983) (requiring retrial of liability and damages on fraud claim where issues of liability and damages were inextricably intertwined), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 870 , 105 S.Ct. 219 , 83 L.Ed.2d 149 (1984).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Coan v. Bell Atlantic Systems Leasing International, Inc.
it is not necessary that a plaintiff describe his damages with a great degree of certainty. cer 950 tainty plays a much more important role in the measure of proof necessary to establish the plaintiff had in fact sustained some damage.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
William F. LITTLEFIELD v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellant
Retirement Bd., 720 F.2d 196 , 201 (D.C.Cir.1983), cer t. denied 469 U.S. 870 , 105 5.Ct. 219, 83 L.Ed.2d 149 (1984) (19 month delay in processing a claim for railroad retirement benefits did not violate due process where there was no evidence that the Board had deliberately delayed action on the claimant’s application so as to avoid paying benefits under a statutory grandfathering provision); Frock v. United States R.R.
cited
Cited "see"
Spence v. Southeastern Alaska Pilots' Ass'n
See McDonald v. Johnson & Johnson, 722 F.2d 1370, 1381 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 870 , 105 S.Ct. 219 , 83 L.Ed.2d 149 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
S.D. Collectibles, Inc. v. Plough, Inc.
See McDonald v. Johnson & Johnson, 722 F.2d 1370, 1374 (8th Cir.1983) (McDonald), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 870 , 105 S.Ct. 219 , 83 L.Ed.2d 149 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ritter v. Cohen
See Givens v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, 720 F.2d 196, 201 (D.C.Cir.1983) (nineteen-month delay in adjudicating appeal of denial of railroad benefits does not violate due process, where plaintiff offers no evidence of intentional delay) cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 219 , 83 L.Ed.2d 149 (1984); Frock v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, 685 F.2d 1041, 1047 (7th Cir. (1982)) (two-year delay in adjudicating appeal does not violate due process) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 , 103 S.Ct. 1185 , 75 L.Ed.2d 432 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ritter v. Cohen
See Givens v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, 720 F.2d 196, 201 (D.C.Cir.1983) (nineteen-month delay in adjudicating appeal of denial of railroad benefits does not violate due process, where plaintiff offers no evidence of intentional delay) cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 219 , 83 L.Ed.2d 149 (1984); Frock v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, 685 F.2d 1041, 1047 (7th Cir.(1982)) (two-year delay in adjudicating appeal does not violate due process) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 , 103 S.Ct. 1185 , 75 L.Ed.2d 432 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stanley McDonald Norman R. Hagfors and Clayton Jensen v. Johnson & Johnson
See McDonald v. Johnson & Johnson, 537 F.Supp. 1282, 1352-54 (D.Minn.1982), aff’d in part and rev’d in part, 722 F.2d 1370 (8th Cir.1983), as modified by 722 F.2d 1390 , cert. denied, - U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 219 , 83 L.Ed.2d 149 (1984). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Janet K. Steiger, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United States Railroad Retirement Board
See Givens v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, 720 F.2d 196 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 219 , 83 L.Ed.2d 149 (1984); Frock v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, 685 F.2d 1041 (7th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 , 103 S.Ct. 1185 , 75 L.Ed.2d 432 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Weisfeld v. Sun Chemical Corp.
See, e.g., McDonald v. Johnson & Johnson, 722 F.2d 1370, 1377-78 (8th Cir.1983) (finding “fact that [employees] voluntarily withdrew as competitors [meant they] lack ‘antitrust injury’ ”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 870 , 105 S.Ct. 219 , 83 L.Ed.2d 149 (1984); Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp., 643 F.2d 1229, 1235 (6th Cir.1981) (holding plaintiffs act of voluntarily withdrawing from competition was proof of lack of antitrust injury).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kurt H. Eichorn v. At&T Corp
See, e.g., McDonald v. Johnson & Johnson, 722 F.2d 1370 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 870 , 83 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Eichorn v. AT & T Corp.
See, e.g., McDonald v. Johnson & Johnson, 722 F.2d 1370 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 870 , 105 S.Ct. 219 , 83 L.Ed.2d 149 (1984); Consultants & Designers, Inc. v. Butler Serv.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Isra Fruit Ltd. v. Agrexco Agricultural Export Co.
Chrysler Corp., 643 F.2d at 1235 ; see also McDonald v. Johnson & *987 Johnson, 722 F.2d 1370, 1375-76 (8th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 219 , 83 L.Ed.2d 149 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Laney v. Coleman Company
Id.; see also McDonald v. Johnson & Johnson, 722 F.2d 1370, 1388 (8th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 219 , 83 L.Ed.2d 149 (1984); Ouachita Nat'l Bank v. Tosco Corp., 686 F.2d 1291, 1299 (8th Cir.1982), modified on other grounds, 716 F.2d 485 (1983) (en banc).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Laney v. Coleman Co.
Id.; see also McDonald v. Johnson & Johnson, 722 F.2d 1370, 1388 (8th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 219 , 83 L.Ed.2d 149 (1984); Ouachita Nat’l Bank v. Tosco Corp., 686 F.2d 1291, 1299 (8th Cir.1982), modified on other grounds, 716 F.2d 485 (1983) (en banc).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mehrens
v.
Arizona
v.
Arizona
No. 83-1654.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.
Justice Brennan would grant certiorari. Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.