green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Davis
See United States v. Macklin , 902 F.2d 1320 , 1330 (8th Cir. 1990) ("[T]o have a legitimate expectation of privacy by way of a possessory interest, defendant must have possession of the vehicle and the keys."), citing United States v. Rose , 731 F.2d 1337 , 1343 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 326 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rashad Russell
See United States v. Macklin, 902 F.2d 1320, 1330 (8th Cir. 1990) (“[T]o have a legitimate expectation of privacy by way of a possessory interest, defendant must have possession of the vehicle and the keys.”), citing United States v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1337, 1343 (8th Cir.), cert denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 326 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984). [[Image here]] The judgment is affirmed. 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dickey
See [United States v.] Rose, 731 F.2d [1337,] 1342 [ (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 326 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984) ].
cited
Cited "see"
Bixby Ranch Co. v. United States
See United States v. Bailey, 734 F.2d 296, 300-01 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 327 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Howard
Although no court has clearly resolved this issue regarding social security payments direct deposited into the account of a proper social security recipient, at least one court has concluded that, regarding federal funds: [M]oney remains “money ... of the United States” within the meaning of § 641 even after being deposited in the bank account of the grantee, see United States v. Largo, 775 F.2d 1099, 1101 (10th Cir.1985) (per curiam), cert. denied, [474] U.S. [1105], 106 S.Ct. 891 , 88 L.Ed.2d 925 (1986), and even if commingled with non-federal funds, see United States v. Von Stephens, 7…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Keller
See United States v. Bailey, 734 F.2d 296, 305 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 327 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984); United States v. Di Fonzo, 603 F.2d 1260, 1266 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1018 , 100 S.Ct. 672 , 62 L.Ed.2d 648 (1980); United States v. Beer, 518 F.2d 168, 170-71 (5th Cir.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert M. Burton, Peter Balogun
See United States v. Bailey, 734 F.2d 296, 303 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 327 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
National City Bank v. Imbody (In Re Imbody)
See, United States v. Bailey, 734 F.2d 296, 303 (7th Cir.1984), cert. den. 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 327 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984); 26 Am.Jur.2d Embezzlement § 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony Hayle v. United States
Federal grant money remains “money ... of the United States” within the meaning of § 641 even after being deposited in the” bank account of the grantee, see United States v. Largo, 775 F.2d 1099, 1101 (10th Cir.1985) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 891 , 88 L.Ed.2d 925 (1986), and even if commingled with non-federal funds, see United States v. Von Stephens, 774 F.2d 1411, 1413 (9th Cir. 1985) (per curiam); United States v. Gibbs, 704 F.2d 464, 466 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam); United States v. Mitchell, 625 F.2d 158, 160-61 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 984 , 101 S…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sharon Lanelle Martinez
See United States v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1337, 1343 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 326 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984); United States v. Griffin, 729 F.2d 475 , 483 n. 11 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 830 , 105 S.Ct. 117 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984). 20 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Woolbright
See United States v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1337, 1342 (8th Cir.), cert. den., 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 326 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Nell Scott, United States of America v. Ronald Scott
See United States v. Bailey, 734 F.2d 296, 300-01 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 327 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jeter
(2×)
See United States v. Garcia, 897 F.2d 1413, 1418 (7th Cir.1990) (where defendant claimed to have borrowed truck under vague arrangement, he had standing given that government failed to disprove that the truck “was not being used with the permission of the owner”); United States v. Miller, 821 F.2d 546, 548-49 (11th Cir.1987) (defendant had standing to challenge search of car borrowed from a friend); United States v. Portillo, 633 F.2d 1313, 1317 (9th Cir.1980) (same), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1043 , 101 S.Ct. 1763 , 68 L.Ed.2d 241 (1981); see also United States v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1337, 1343 (…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Rene Ponce
(2×)
This Court has repeatedly held that when “a person has borrowed an automobile from another, with the other’s consent, the borrower becomes a lawful possessor of the vehicle and thus has standing to challenge its search.” United States v. Kye Soo Lee, 898 F.2d 1034, 1038 (5th Cir.1990) (citing United States v. Martinez, 808 F.2d 1050, 1056 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 1962 , 95 L.Ed.2d 533 (1987); see also United States v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1337, 1343 (5th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 326 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ramon Rubio-Rivera
United States v. Garcia, 897 F.2d 1413, 1418 (7th Cir.1990) (where defendant claimed to have borrowed truck under vague arrangement, he had standing given that government failed to disprove that the truck “was not being used with the permission of the owner”); United States v. Miller, 821 F.2d 546, 548-49 (11th Cir.1987) (defendant had standing to challenge search of car borrowed from a friend); United States v. Portillo, 633 F.2d 1313, 1317 (9th Cir.1980) (same), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1043 , 101 S.Ct. 1763 , 1764, 68 L.Ed.2d 241 (1981); see also United States v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1337, 1343…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Steven Dale Winsor
See, e.g., United States v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1337, 1342 (8th Cir.) (yellow car driven by black female), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 931 , 105 S.Ct. 326 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984); Luckett v. State, 259 Ind. 174 , 284 N.E.2d 738, 741-42 (1972) (police “did not have probable cause to stop every green automobile with an 82J license prefix” in a given area, but they did have reasonable suspicion).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Beverly J. Ramsey, Michael J. Marshall, Stuart A. McCreary and James Joseph O'DOnnell
See also United States v. Bailey, 734 F.2d 296, 306 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 327 , 83 L.Ed.2d 263 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
White Lance
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-7006.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1984.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.