green
Positive treatment
10.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. King
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 924 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brigido Marmolejo, Jr. And Mario Salinas
(2×)
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Rabito v. United States, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983) 19 Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co., 473 U.S. 479, 498 , 105 S.Ct. 3275, 3286 , 87 L.Ed.2d 346 (1985) 20 Salinas also argues that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for RICO conspiracy.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marmolejo
(2×)
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Rabito v. United States, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983). .
cited
Cited "see"
Libertarian Party of Washington v. Munro
Fla.Stat.Ann. § 99.-096(5); see Libertarian Party v. Florida, 710 F.2d 790 (11th Cir.1983) (approving this scheme), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 117 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Libertarian Party Of Washington v. Munro
Sec. 99.096(5); see Libertarian Party v. Florida, 710 F.2d 790 (11th Cir.1983) (approving this scheme), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 117 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984)
discussed
Cited "see"
Volmar Distributors, Inc. v. New York Post Co., Inc.
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 918 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984) (although the language of § 1961(1)(A) allows for conspiracies to violate the provisions therein to serve as a predicate act for a RICO claim, that language is conspicuously omitted from § 1961(1)(B) & (Q); United States v. Weisman, 624 F.2d 1118, 1123-24 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 91 (1980) (to the same effect).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Federico Giovanelli, Steven Maltese, and Carmine Gualtiere
(2×)
See generally United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 925-28 (2d Cir.) (Newman, J., concurring in relevant part), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984). 47 In contrast, Gualtiere's convictions present a more difficult question.
cited
Cited "see"
Browning Avenue Realty Corp. v. Rosenshein
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ferrell v. United States
See Gardner v. TEC Sys., Inc., 725 F.2d 1338, 1345 (Fed.Cir.) (en banc) (reviewing courts shall disregard harmless errors which do not affect the parties’ substantive rights), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 830 , 105 S.Ct. 116 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Sutton Regan, Jack Z. Rabinowitz, Steven Barry Smotrich, Charles M. Zarzecki, Paul A. Berkman, and Bruce Lee Newberg
(2×)
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 922 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Peter Gabor Kalman v. The Berlyn Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant
See Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951, 961 , 220 USPQ 592, 600 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 835 , 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 , 225 USPQ 232 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Todaro v. Orbit International Travel, Ltd.
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 923 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); Scotto, supra, 641 F.2d at 52 ; United States v. Huber, 603 F.2d 387, 393 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 927 , 100 S.Ct. 1312 , 63 L.Ed.2d 759 (1980); see also Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Malatesta, 1990 WL 96748 , 1990 U.S.Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alex Beverly, Betty McNulty George Brown and Diane Griffin
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921-22 (2d Cir.) (RICO conviction reversed where legally insufficient predicate act may have been necessary to verdict), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); Natelli, 527 F.2d at 325 (court relied on "the general principle" of Yates and found that general verdict was ambiguous and therefore reversible where one object in multi-object count was unsupported by the evidence; court did not identify that Yates related to legal insufficiency). 41 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. Angiulo
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 923 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rafael L. Corona, Ray L. Corona
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921-23 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rastelli
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rastelli
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Manifold v. Blunt
See Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U.S. at 788 & n. 9, 103 S.Ct. at 1570 & n. 9 (1983) * * *. 14 764 F.2d at 541 (quoting Libertarian Party v. Florida, 710 F.2d 790 , 793 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 117 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984)). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
Manifold v. Blunt
See Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U.S. at 788 & n. 9, 103 S.Ct. at 1570 & n. 9 (1983) 764 F.2d at 541 (quoting Libertarian Party v. Florida, 710 F.2d 790 , 793 (11th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 117 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984)). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Finley
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ryco, Inc., Plaintiff/counterdefendant/appellant v. Ag-Bag Corporation, Defendant/counterclaimant/cross-Appellant v. Kelly P. Ryan and Blair Manufacturing Company, Counterdefendants/appellants, Richard H. Lee and David H. Rasmussen
See Gardner v. TEC Sys., Inc., 725 F.2d 1338, 1350 , 220 USPQ 777, 786 (Fed.Cir.) (in banc) (dependent claim not separately argued is invalid along with independent claim), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 830 , 105 S.Ct. 116 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ryco, Inc. v. Ag-Bag Corp.
See Gardner v. TEC Sys., Inc., 725 F.2d 1338, 1350 , 220 USPQ 777, 786 (Fed.Cir.) (in banc) (dependent claim not separately argued is invalid along with independent claim), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 830 , 105 S.Ct. 116 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re United States
See United States v. Spock, 416 F.2d [165,] 182 [ (1st Cir.1969) ]. 25 Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 927 (2d Cir.) (Newman, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (footnote and citations omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gruber v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.) (holding that RICO conspiracy requires showing “that defendant himself at least agreed to commit two or more predicate crimes”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernesto J. Benevento, Ernest A. Benevento, Earl A. Keller, and Carmine Loiacono
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 918 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Weisman, 624 F.2d 1118, 1123-24 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 91 (1980); 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (1)(D).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kragness
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Vastola
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 923 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Santoro, 647 F.Supp. 153, 177-78 (E.D.N.Y.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Ingber v. Enzor
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 928 (2d Cir.) (Newman, J., concurring in relevant part and dissenting in part), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kloster Speedsteel Ab v. Crucible Inc.
See Gardner v. TEC Systems, Inc., 725 F.2d 1338, 1345-46 , 220 USPQ 777, 783-84 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 116 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984). 43 In arguing that the district court failed to ascertain the differences between the invention set forth in claim 30 and the prior art, Stora has failed to carry its burden on appeal. 44 (iii) Level of Skill 45 Stora's contention that the district court committed legal error when it did not find a specific level of skill in the art is equally without merit.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Neapolitan, United States of America v. Thomas Covello, Sr., Ralph Mascio, Jr., Joseph W. Hlavach, Antoine A. Turner, Victor R. Meadows, and Clement A. Messino
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Rabito v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Neapolitan
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Rabito v. United States, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clark J. Matthews II
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 922-23 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. ——, 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Margiotta, 646 F.2d 729, 733 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 913 , 103 S.Ct. 1891 , 77 L.Ed.2d 282 (1983); United States v. Quicksey, 525 F.2d 337, 340-41 (4th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 878 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rodewald
See United States v. Griffin, 729 F.2d 475, 485 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 117 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984) (officer’s suspicion of bag’s contents does not invalidate inventory search of bag).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Benjamin Ruggiero and John Cerasani
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Benzion Golomb
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 925 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marchese
Moreover, “[t]o establish denial of due process based on excessive pre-indictment delay [a defendant] bears the heavy burden ... of showing not only that he was prejudiced by the delay but that it was so unfair as to violate fundamental concepts of fair play and decency, such as would occur if the prosecutor deliberately used the delay to achieve a substantial tactical advantage.” Id. (citing United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783 , 97 S.Ct. 2044 , 52 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977)); see also United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 925 (2d Cir.) (defendant “failed to show either actual prejudice or…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Campos v. State
Compare United States v. Martinez, 808 F.2d 1050, 1056 (5th Cir.1987) (standing found when owner-boyfriend testified that defendant had permission to use the caí’), and United States v. Griffin, 729 F.2d 475 , 483 n. 11 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 830 , 105 S.Ct. 117 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984) (non-owners had standing where petitioners had permission to drive and exclusive control over the vehicle that day), with United States v. Figueroa-Espana, 511 F.3d 696, 704 (7th Cir.2007) (no standing where defendant could not identify the owner of the vehicle and produced no evidence of permi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reform Party of Florida v. Black
See Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974); Jenness v. Fortson, 403 U.S. 431 , 91 S.Ct. 1970 , 29 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); American Party of Texas v. White, 415 U.S. 767 , 94 S.Ct. 1296 , 39 L.Ed.2d 744 (1974); see also Libertarian Party v. State of Florida, 710 F.2d 790 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 117 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984) (upholding Florida's petition signature requirement for minor party candidates, which at the time was three percent of registered voters a substantially more burdensome requirement than the one percent under current …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gigante
See, e.g., United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 923 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harry Sholola
(4×)
Id. at 369 , 96 S.Ct. at 3097 ; see also United States v. Griffin, 729 F.2d 475, 481 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 830 , 105 S.Ct. 117 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McLaughlin v. North Carolina Board of Elections
Compare Libertarian Party of Fla. v. State of Fla., 710 F.2d 790 , 799 (11th Cir.1983), cert, denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 117 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984), and cases cited.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ball
See, e.g., United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F. 2d 913, 923 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Rabito v. United States, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed. 2d 60 (1984); United States v. Martino, 648 F. 2d 367 , 381 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied sub nom., Russello v. United States, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed. 2d 465 (1982); United States v. Boffa, 513 F. Supp. 444, 460-61 (D.C.Del. 1980) (collecting federal decisions addressing this issue).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Manuel Antonio Ogando, Anastasio Pineda Ogando, Also Known as Anibal, Also Known as Matuti and Bienvenido Castillo
These complexities have prompted us to conclude that, notwithstanding the law’s “traditional distaste for special interrogatories,” United States v. Coonan, 839 F.2d 886, 891 (2d Cir.1988), “where the offense charged required proof of a specific number of predicate facts and the nature of the proof at trial warrants it, the trial court *149 would be well advised to submit to the jury interrogatories that would allow an assessment of whether the jury’s determination of guilt rested on permissible bases.” United States v. Roman, 870 F.2d 65, 73 (2d Cir.) (CCE case), cert. denied, 490…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Boswell
(2×)
See also United States v. Griffin, 729 F.2d 475 (7th Cir.) (valid exercise of caretaking function to impound vehicle rather than leave it parked at side of interstate highway, even though defendant asked to have a friend retrieve it, because of need to protect car from vandalism or theft), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 830 , 105 S.Ct. 117 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Staller, 616 F.2d 1284 (5th Cir.) (upholding search subsequent to police taking custody of defendant’s legally-parked automobile as legitimate exercise of caretaking function because of risk to car parked overnight in mall …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Richard E. Woodruff
See, e.g., Gardner v. TEC Sys., Inc., 725 F.2d 1338 , 220 USPQ 777 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 830 , 105 S.Ct. 116 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272 , 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980); In re Ornitz, 351 F.2d 1013 , 53 CCPA 716, 147 USPQ 283 (1965); In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454 , 42 CCPA 824, 105 USPQ 233 (1955).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Scarpa
Moreover, "[t]o establish denial of due process based on excessive pre-indictment delay [a defendant] bears the heavy burden ... of showing not only that he was prejudiced by the delay but that it was so unfair as to violate fundamental concepts of fair play and decency, such as would occur if the prosecutor deliberately used the delay to achieve a substantial tactical advantage." Id. (citing United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783 , 97 S.Ct. 2044 , 52 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977)); see also United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 925 (2d Cir.) (defendant "failed to show either actual prejudice or unjus…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Scarpa
Moreover, “[t]o establish denial of due process based on excessive pre-indictment delay [a defendant] bears the heavy burden ... of showing not only that he was prejudiced by the delay but that it was so unfair as to violate fundamental concepts of fair play and decency, such as would occur if the prosecutor deliberately used the delay to achieve a substantial tactical advantage.” Id. (citing United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783 , 97 S.Ct. 2044 , 52 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977)); see also United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 925 (2d Cir.) (defendant “failed to show either actual prejudice or…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Garcia and Jane Lee Garcia
United States v. Natelli, 527 F.2d 311, 325 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1663 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976); see also United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dennis E. Pryba, Phe, Inc., Amicus Curiae. United States of America v. Barbara A. Pryba, Phe, Inc., Amicus Curiae. United States of America v. Educational Books, Inc., Phe, Inc., Amicus Curiae. United States of America v. Jennifer G. Williams, Phe, Inc., Amicus Curiae
Read in context, section 1962(d) makes it unlawful to conspire to conduct or participate in the conduct of an enterprise's affairs, where its affairs are conducted through a pattern of racketeering activity."); see also United States v. Kragness, 830 F.2d 842, 859 (8th Cir.1987). 77 The First and Second Circuits have adopted appellants' view in United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984) and United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gardner
v.
TEC Systems, Inc.
v.
TEC Systems, Inc.
No. 83-2023.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.