green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.4 score
“the knowing supply of a raw material necessary for the commission of a crime by another constitutes aiding and abetting that crime.”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Fiorentino Zambrano, Salvatore Cardella, Frank Grappone
the knowing supply of a raw material necessary for the commission of a crime by another constitutes aiding and abetting that crime.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Javier Vasquez-Velasco
See United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1083-84 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984); Brown v. United States, 299 F.2d 438 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 946 , 82 S.Ct. 1593 , 8 L.Ed.2d 812 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Patrick
(2×)
See United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1080 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Patrick
(2×)
See United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1080 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rivera v. United States
In the context of a criminal case, where a magistrate has found that an affidavit presented to him showed that there was probable cause for the issuance of a warrant, a challenge to the veracity of the affidavit merits a hearing only if the challenger makes a "substantial preliminary showing" that the affiant knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, made a false statement in his affidavit and if the allegedly false statement was "necessary to the finding of probable cause." Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-56 , 98 S.Ct. 2674, 2676 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978); see…
discussed
Cited "see"
Rivera v. United States
In the context of a criminal case, where a magistrate has found that an affidavit presented to him showed that there was probable cause for the issuance of a warrant, a challenge to the veracity of the affidavit merits a hearing only if the challenger makes a “substantial preliminary showing” that the affiant knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, made a false statement in his affidavit and if the allegedly false statement was “necessary to the finding of probable cause.” Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-56 , 98 S.Ct. 2674, 2676 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (19…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carlos Manuel Perez
See United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1080 (2d Cir.) (one who launders the proceeds received following distribution of drugs may be held as an aider and abettor of substantive drug violations), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984); accord United States v. Lignarolo, 770 F.2d 971 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1948 , 90 L.Ed.2d 358 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Biaggi
See United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arthur Michael Newman v. United States
See 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b). 2 The use of a special verdict identifying which underlying offenses were the objects of the conspiracy would have eliminated this ambiguity. 3 In United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984), the Second Circuit was confronted with precisely this issue and invalidated the sentence.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. All Funds & Other Property Contained in Account Number 031-217362
See United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1078-79 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bollinger
See United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1079-81 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven Robert Bolinger, Robert Jerome McTeer Bruce Hayes Munro, Juan Carlos De La Fuente, United States of America v. Johnny Dean Hall, United States of America v. Juan Carlos De La Fuente, United States of America v. Oscar Cruz-Barrientos, United States of America v. Juan Carlos De La Fuente
See United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1079-81 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hsia
See, e.g., United States v. Gometz, 730 F.2d 475 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 155 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984) (finding that 70% non-response rate did not violate Jury Act).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Olga Moreno, Hector Becerra, Oscar Fabio Moreno, Hernan Moreno
Id.; see also United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1083 (2d Cir.) (“[I]n the absence of a *215 special verdict, there was no way ... to know whether the jury intended to convict [the defendant] for a cocaine-related conspiracy, for a marijuana-related conspiracy, or for a conspiracy involving both drugs.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 155, 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rioux
See also United States v. Gometz, 730 F.2d 475, 479-80 (7th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 155 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984) (quoting S.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Haywood
See, e.g., United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1080 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984); United States v. Metz, 608 F.2d 147, 153 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 821 , 101 S.Ct. 80 , 66 L.Ed.2d 24 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rosa
See, e.g., United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1086 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 155, 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984); United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d at 63 n. 18; United States v. Alessi, 638 F.2d at 472 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rosa
See, e.g., United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1086 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 155, 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984); United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d at 63 n. 18; United States v. Alessi, 638 F.2d at 472 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Termini
See, e.g., United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984); United States v. Enstam, 622 F.2d 857 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1351 , 67 L.Ed.2d 336 (1981); United States v. Freedson, 608 F.2d 739 (9th Cir. 1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Speer
See also United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1080 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984) (money laundering after actual delivery of drugs is sufficient in proving a conspiracy to aid and abet drug distribution).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dalmiro Eduardo Campuzano and John Jario Rios
See United States v. Pforzheimer, 826 F.2d 200, 206 (2d Cir.1987); see also United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1083-84 (2d Cir.) (special interrogatories only way to determine applicable sentence for conspiracy conviction involving controlled substances), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 & 155, 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Evans
See, e.g., U.S. v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1080 (2nd Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 155 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984); U.S. v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121 , 154-55 (2nd Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980) (“Importers, wholesalers, purchasers of cutting materials, and persons who ‘wash’ money are all as necessary to the success of the venture as is the retailer.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oscar Fernando Cuevas
(2×)
United States v. Dela Espriella, 781 F.2d 1432, 1436 (9th Cir.1986); see also United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1080 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 155 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984). 33 There is also no dispute that appellant deposited more than nineteen million U.S. dollars (in small bills) at British banks from May to November 1984, and that sufficient evidence was introduced to support the jury's finding of a conspiracy to sell narcotics. 11 34 The only dispute is whether sufficient evidence was introduced to support the jury's finding that Cuevas knew that these vas…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Pforzheimer
See, e.g., Unit *206 ed States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1084 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 155 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984); United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 926 (2d Cir.) (Newman, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 85 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Murray, 618 F.2d 892 , 895 n. 3 (2d Cir.1980); United States v. Stassi, 544 F.2d 579, 583-84 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, ■ 430 U.S. 907 , 97 S.Ct. 1176 , 1177, 51 L.Ed.2d 582 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ingber v. Enzor
Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. 359 , 51 S.Ct. 532 , 75 L.Ed. 1117 (1931); see also United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1083 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984); United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d at 921 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patrick Quemener, Yann Raymond Boedec, Steven Seward
Even absent that specific statutory authorization, an “intent to cause effects within the United States also makes it reasonable to apply to persons outside United States territory a statute which is not expressly extraterritorial in scope.” United States v. Muench, 694 F.2d 28, 33 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 1881 , 76 L.Ed.2d 811 (1983); see also United States v. Orozco-Prada, 732 F.2d 1076, 1088 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 154 , 83 L.Ed.2d 92 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Orozco
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-6888.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Cited by 95 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.