green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.4 score
“probable cause to believe certain items will be found in a specific location is a 'practical, nontechnical conception,' that need not be based on direct, first-hand, or 'hard' evidence.”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Porter v. State
But see United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1366-67 (2d Cir.1985) (holding that dog sniff at door of apartment constituted search), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985), and cert. denied, 479 U.S. 818 , 107 S.Ct. 78 , 93 L.Ed.2d 34 (1986); State v. Ortiz, 257 Neb. 784 , 600 N.W.2d 805, 819-20 (1999) (holding that dog sniff in hallway outside apartment was a search).
discussed
Cited "but see"
In Re Montrail M.
But see United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1367 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 67, 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985) (dog sniff conducted outside door of apartment found to be a search).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Conrad Whitehead, Ii, United States of America v. Hector Quesada
(2×)
Id. at 891; see United States v. Quinn, 815 F.2d 153, 159 (1st Cir.1987) (upholding dog sniff inside defendant’s automobile on showing of reasonable suspicion, unclear whether defendant consented to dog’s intrusion); but cf. United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359 (2d Cir.1985), (dog sniff in corridor outside residential apartment is a search requiring probable cause and a warrant), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1986); see generally United States v. Dicesare, 765 F.2d 890, 901-03 (9th Cir.1985) (Reinhardt, J., concurring) (opining that dogs are potentially more…
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Raffi Nakashian, A/K/A \Ralfi
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (rule)
See Whalen v. United States, 445 U.S. 684 , 694 n. 8, 100 S.Ct. 1432 , 1439 n. 8, 63 L.Ed.2d 715 (1980); Whalen, 445 U.S. at 710 -12 and nn. 5 & 6, 100 S.Ct. at 1447 -48 nn. 5 & 6 (Rehnquist, J., dissenting); see also Iannelli v. United States, 420 U.S. 770 , 785 n. 17, 95 S.Ct. 1284 , 1293 n. 17, 43 L.Ed.2d 616 (1975); but cf. United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1372-76 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S.-,-, 106 S.Ct. 66 , 67, 88 L.Ed.2d 54, 55 (1985) and — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 78 , 93 L.Ed.2d 34 (1986) (Newman, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). 8 .
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re the Nomination Petitions & Papers of Stevenson
(2×)
delaware valley ii
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Cruz Corral
probable cause to believe certain items will be found in a specific location is a 'practical, nontechnical conception,' that need not be based on direct, first-hand, or 'hard' evidence.
cited
Cited "see"
Richard Alan Haase v. Hychem, Inc.
See Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air v. Pennsylvania, C.A.3d, 1985, 755 F.2d 38, 43 , quoting Wright, Miller & Cooper, certiorari denied 106 S.Ct. 67 , 474 U.S. 819 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alex Wong, Roger Kwok, Chen I. Chung, Tung Tran, Danny Ngo, Brian Chan, Joseph Wang, Chiang T. Cheng, and Steven Ng
(2×)
See United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1363-64 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 67 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985), 479 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 67 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Escobar
See United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1365 (2d Cir.) cert. denied sub nom Fisher v. United States, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Colson v. Mitchell
See United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1363 (2d Cir.) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hancock v. Dodson
Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170, 180 , 104 S.Ct. 1735, 1742 , 80 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984); See United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1367 (2d Cir.) (reasonable expectation of privacy around front door of home), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hancock v. Dodson
Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170, 180 , 104 S.Ct. 1735, 1742 , 80 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984); See United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1367 (2d Cir.) (reasonable expectation of privacy around front door of home), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Coonan
See United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1370 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 67, 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985); United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d at 63 -64 n. 18.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Coonan
See United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1370 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 67, 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985); United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d at 63 -64 n. 18.
discussed
Cited "see"
The Money Store, Inc. v. Harriscorp Finance, Inc.
(2×)
See Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council v. Pennsylvania, 755 F.2d 38, 41 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 67 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985); DeFilippis v. United States, 567 F.2d 341, 343 (7th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ayers v. Philadelphia Housing Authority
See Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 755 F.2d 38 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 67 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985) (consent decree approved by federal district court may not be collaterally attacked in state court on underlying state law issue).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando Estevez
See United States v. Coronel-Quintana, 752 F.2d 1284, 1291 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985); United States v. Anguloa, 598 F.2d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir.1979); see also Fed.R.Crim.P. 28.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Mira
See generally United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Persico
See United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1364-65 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Persico
See United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1364-65 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
44 Fair empl.prac.cas. 977, 44 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,376 Matthew E. Jackson, Jr. v. University of Pittsburgh, David C. Sullivan and Wesley W. Posvar, in Their Official and Individual Capacities
See generally Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air v. Pennsylvania, 755 F.2d 38 , 40 n. 2 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 67 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Jackson v. University of Pittsburgh
See generally Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air v. Pennsylvania, 755 F.2d 38 , 40 n. 2 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 67 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael E. Jones, United States of America v. Ralph Milton Pfeister
See United States v. Coronel-Quintana, 752 F.2d 1284, 1288 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 66 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
HARRIS v. McCARTHY
See Green v. Obledo, 161 Cal.App.3d 678 , 207 Cal.Rptr. 830 (1984), --- U.S. ----, cert. denied, 106 S.Ct. 67 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985); Filipino Accountants' Ass'n v. State Board of Accountancy, 155 Cal.App.3d 1023 , 204 Cal.Rptr. 913 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. McCarthy
See Green v. Obledo, 161 Cal.App.3d 678 , 207 Cal.Rptr. 830 (1984), — U.S. -, cert. denied, 106 S.Ct. 67 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985); Filipino Accountants’ Ass’n v. State Board of Accountancy, 155 Cal.App.3d 1023 , 204 Cal. Rptr. 913 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ganias
See United States v. Reilly, 76 F.3d 1271, 1280 (2d Cir.) (“The good faith exception to the exclusionary rule does not protect searches by officers who fail to provide all potentially adverse information to the issuing judge.... ”), aff'd and amended, 91 F.3d 331 (2d Cir. 1996) (per curiam); see also United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1368 (2d Cir. 1985) (finding good faith reliance on a warrant, under Leon , where officers, first, committed a constitutional violation they did not reasonably know, at the time, was unconstitutional — a warrantless canine sniff— and second, in relyi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Antone R. White, A/K/A Tone
Compare United States v. Kragness, 830 F.2d 842, 864 (8th Cir.1987) ("[Pjroof of the RICO conspiracy in fact rested upon proof of the drug conspiracies, and not upon proof of an agreement that some other predicate offenses would be committed.”) and United States v. Johnson, 911 F.2d 1394, 1398 (10th Cir.1990) with United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1371 (2d Cir.1985) ("[A] RICO conspiracy charge is satisfied by proof of an agreement to commit a felony, no proof of conspiracy to commit narcotics violations is necessary,”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 818 , 107 S.Ct. 78 , 93 L.Ed.2d 34 (1986…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Smith
See, e.g., United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1367 (2d Cir.), cert. den. 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66, 67 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985) (dog sniff outside apartment door requires probable cause); Commonwealth v. Martin, 534 Pa. 136 , 626 A.2d 556 (Pa.1993) (requiring probable cause and warrant for dog sniff of person); but see People v. Dunn, 563 N.Y.S.2d 388 , 564 N.E.2d at 1058 (dog sniff outside apartment requires reasonable suspicion). [6] The continued viability of this theory in Oregon is questionable.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Campion v. State, Department of Community & Regional Affairs, Housing Assistance Division
In Americana Fabrics , the court noted that “a combination of constitutional and statutory considerations requires state courts to give [preclusive] effect to the judgments of federal courts.” Americana Fabrics, 754 F.2d at 1529 (citing Stoll v. Gottlieb, 305 U.S. 165, 170-71 , 59 S.Ct. 134, 136-37 , 83 L.Ed. 104 (1938)); see also Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air v. Pennsylvania, 755 F.2d 38 , 43 (3d Cir.) (noting the “clearly established rule that state courts must give full faith and credit to the proceedings of federal courts”), cert denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Maldonado-Rivera
See, e.g., United States v. Nakashian, 820 F.2d at 553 (§ 371 conspiracy and conspiracy to import and distribute narcotics in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 963 and 846); United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d at 237 (§ 371 conspiracy and RICO conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (d)); see also, United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1369-71 (2d Cir.) (finding two specific conspiracy statutes, 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (d) and 21 U.S.C. § 846 , to be nonmultiplicitous), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Wynne
See e.g., United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 67 , 88 L.Ed. 2d 54 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Best v. California Apprenticeship Council
(2×)
(Cf. Webb v. Dyer County Bd. of Ed., supra, 471 U.S. at pp. 250-252 [85 L.Ed.2d at pp. 247-248, 105 S.Ct. at p. 1933 , cone, and dis. opn. of Brennan, J., and Blackmun, J.] [no reason to draw artificial distinction based on whether time spent preparing directly for litigation or instead in administrative proceeding that led directly to litigation]; North Carolina Dept. of Transp. v. Crest Street (1986) 479 U.S. 6, 14 [ 93 L.Ed. 2d 188, 196-197 , 107 S.Ct. 336, 341 ] [a court may award fees for administrative proceedings prior to the litigation].) We hold Best is entitled to an award of attorne…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eduardo Arocena, A/K/A \Omar
See, e.g., United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359 (2d Cir.) (denying a similar challenge to consecutive sentences), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 66 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Coronel-Quintana
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 84-1775.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1985.
Cited by 24 opinions | Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.