State v. Noser, 789 N.E.2d 222 (Ohio 2003).

State v. Noser, 789 N.E.2d 222 (Ohio 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment Quoted verbatim 1× 14.3 score

“the practice of allowing jurors to question witnesses provides for two-way communication through which jurors can more effectively fulfill their fundamental role as factfinders.”

212 citation events (212 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: State v. Doleszny (vt, 2004-01-30)

Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

2003 2014 2026

Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers. How cited ↗

examined Cited as authority (verbatim quote) State v. Doleszny (3×) also: Cited as authority (rule)

Vt. · 2004 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high

the practice of allowing jurors to question witnesses provides for two-way communication through which jurors can more effectively fulfill their fundamental role as factfinders.

discussed Cited as authority (rule) Handy v. State

Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2011 · confidence medium

See Ex parte Malone, 12 So.3d 60, 65 (Ala.2008) (holding that it is within discretion of trial court to allow jurors to question witnesses); Landt v. State, 87 P.3d 73, 80 (Alaska Ct.App.2004) (concluding that trial court’s procedure for permitting jurors to propose questions in writing for witnesses was not an abuse of discretion); State v. Greer, 190 Ariz. 378 , 948 P.2d 995, 997 (Ariz.Ct.App.1997) (holding that Arizona rule of criminal procedure permitting written questions from the jury was not unconstitutional); Plummer v. United States, 870 A.2d 539, 543 (D.C.2005) (finding no abuse of…

discussed Cited as authority (rule) Ex Parte Malone (2×)

Ala. · 2008 · confidence medium

Malone cites Ohio v. Gilden, 144 Ohio App.3d 69 , 759 N.E.2d 468 (2001); however, in Ohio v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127, 135 , 789 N.E.2d 222, 230 (2003), the Ohio Supreme Court overruled that decision and held that “the practice of allowing jurors to question witnesses is not error — constitutional or otherwise.” Malone also cites two Colorado cases; People v. Merklin, 80 P.3d 921 (Colo.Ct.App.2003), and Medina v. People, 114 P.3d 845 (Colo.2005).

discussed Cited as authority (rule) Medina v. People (2×)

Colo. · 2005 · confidence medium

Ctr., 293 N.W.2d 550, 556 (Iowa 1980); State v. Culkin, 97 Hawai'i 206 , 35 P.3d 233, 253 (2001); Transit Auth. of River City v. Montgomery, 836 S.W.2d 413, 416 (Ky.1992); Commonwealth v. Urena, 417 Mass. 692 , 632 N.E.2d 1200, 1206 (1994); People v. Heard, 388 Mich. 182 , 200 N.W.2d 73, 76 (1972); Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon Hosp., 863 S.W.2d 852, 867 (Mo.1993); State v. Graves, 274 Mont. 264 , 907 P.2d 963, 966-67 (1995); State v. Jumpp, 261 N.J.Super. 514 , 619 A.2d 602, 610-12 (1993); People v. Bacic, 202 A.D.2d 234 , 608 N.Y.S.2d 452 (1994); State v. Howard, 320 N.C. 718 , 360 S.E.2d 790…

discussed Cited "see" English v. Warden. Trumbull Correctional Institution

S.D. Ohio · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high

See State v. Jones, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio- 3051, ¶ 2, citing State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127 , 2003-Ohio- 2761, 789 N.E.2d 222, ¶ 18 . {¶91} The alleged irregularity occurred on the first full day of jury deliberations.

discussed Cited "see" State v. Hackett (Slip Opinion)

Ohio · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high

See State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127 , 2003-Ohio-2761 , 789 N.E.2d 222 , ¶ 9, citing Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 307-310 , 111 S.Ct. 1246 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302 (1991). {¶ 90} Structural errors that require automatic reversal include the denial of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, see Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 , 83 S.Ct. 792 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963), and the denial of the corelative Sixth Amendment right to forgo counsel and represent oneself, see McKaskle, 465 U.S. 168 , 104 S.Ct. 944 , 79 L.Ed.2d 122 .

discussed Cited "see" State v. Howard

Ohio Ct. App. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high

See Boaston, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-1061, at ¶ 60 . {¶34} Crim.R. 52(A) provides, “Any error, defect, irregularity, or variance which does not affect substantial rights shall be disregarded.” In order for a defendant’s substantial rights to be prejudiced by an error, the error “must have affected the outcome of the [trial] court proceedings.” Boaston at ¶ 62, quoting State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127 , 2003-Ohio-2761 , 789 N.E.2d 222, ¶ 7 . {¶35} This requires a three-part analysis: First, it must be determined whether the defendant was prejudiced by the error, i.e., whethe…

discussed Cited "see" State v. English

Ohio Ct. App. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high

See State v. Jones, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3051, ¶ 2 , citing State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127 , 2003- Ohio-2761, 789 N.E.2d 222, ¶ 18 . 2 R.C. 2938.11(F) provides that “[a]ny verdict arrived at by the jury, or finding determined by the judge or magistrate in trial to the court, shall be announced and received only in open court as soon as it is determined.” 3 Crim.R. 31(A) provides that “[t]he verdict shall be unanimous.

cited Cited "see" State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)

Ohio · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high

See State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127 , 2003-Ohio-2761 , 789 N.E.2d 222, ¶ 18 .

discussed Cited "see" State v. Jones (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."

unknown court · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high

See State v. Fisher , 99 Ohio St.3d 127 , 2003-Ohio-2761 , 789 N.E.2d 222 , ¶ 7.

cited Cited "see" State v. Furr

Ohio Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high

See State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127 , 2003-Ohio-2761 , 789 N.E.2d 222, ¶ 18 ; State v. Conway, 108 Ohio St.3d 214 , 2006-Ohio-791 , 842 N.E.2d 996 , ¶ 55.

cited Cited "see" State v. Rogers

Ohio Ct. App. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high

See State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127 , 2003-Ohio-2761 , 789 N.E.2d 222, ¶ 9 .

discussed Cited "see" Striff v. Luke Med. Practitioners, Inc.

Ohio Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high

See State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127 , 2003-Ohio-2761 , 789 N.E.2d 222, ¶9 (stating that in Fulminante, the “United States Supreme Court denominated the two types of constitutional errors that may occur in the course of a criminal proceeding - ‘trial errors,’ which are reviewable for harmless error, and ‘structural errors,’ which are per se cause for reversal.” Emphasis added.) The United States Supreme Court and Ohio courts have found structural errors warranting reversal in only a very limited number of cases.

discussed Cited "see" State v. Gonzalez (2×)

Ohio Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high

See State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127, 2003-Ohio-2761 , 789 N.E.2d 222 , at ¶ 7. 20 .

discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Sutherland

Ohio Ct. App. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127 , 2003-Ohio-2761 , 789 N.E.2d 222, ¶ 7 ; State v. Jones, 160 Ohio St.3d 314 , 2020- Ohio-3051, 156 N.E.3d 872, ¶ 18 . {¶ 21} As to the first element, Sutherland reasons that the information the jury saw in Exhibit 5 was so prejudicial that it necessarily affected the verdict.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Cantrill

Ohio Ct. App. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low

Hamilton No. C-170358, 2018- Ohio-4754, 124 N.E.3d 439, ¶ 20 , motion to certify allowed, 155 Ohio St.3d 1418 , 2019- Ohio-1315, 120 N.E.3d 865 , ¶ 20, citing United States v. Davila, 569 U.S. 597, 611 , 133 S.Ct. 2139 , 186 L.Ed.2d 139 (2013); see also State v. Hill, 92 Ohio St.3d 191, 199 , 749 N.E.2d 274 (2001). 19. {¶ 34} In considering a claim of structural error, the threshold inquiry is whether the claimed error “‘involves the deprivation of a constitutional right.’” State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127 , 2003-Ohio-2761 , 789 N.E.2d 222, ¶ 18 , quoting State v. Issa, 93 Ohio S…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Brown

Ohio Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low

See, e.g., State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127 , 2003-Ohio-2761 , 789 N.E.2d 222, ¶ 7 . {¶ 74} We first find no error or deviation from law in this case, as we decline to subscribe to the rationale put forth in Sweet which supports that it is impossible for a trial court to find a juvenile’s offenses reflect irreparable corruption.

cited Cited "see, e.g." Dorsey v. Banks

S.D. Ohio · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low

See, also, State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127, 129 , 2003-Ohio-2761 at ¶ 7, 789 N.E.2d 222 , 224-225.

cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Randolph, 2008-Ca-2 (11-24-2008)