Mercer Island Citizens for Fair Process v. Tent City 4, 247 P.3d 421 (Wash. 2011). · Go Syfert
Mercer Island Citizens for Fair Process v. Tent City 4, 247 P.3d 421 (Wash. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the mandatory reporters do not have skills or special knowledge in common; rather, the commonality among the class of mandatory reporters is primary and frequent contact with children who might be at risk of abuse.”
42 citation events (42 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Picciano v. Clark County (wawd, 2024-08-19)
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Picciano v. Clark County
W.D. Wash. · 2024 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
everything within a doctor-patient relationship 22 is not necessarily health care
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. James-Buhl
Wash. · 2018 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the mandatory reporters do not have skills or special knowledge in common; rather, the commonality among the class of mandatory reporters is primary and frequent contact with children who might be at risk of abuse.
cited Cited "see, e.g." M.G. v. Yakima Sch. Dist. No. 7
Wash. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Manuel, 94 Wn.2d 695, 699 , 619 P.2d 977 (1980); see also Beggs v. Dep’t of Soc. & Health Servs., 171 Wn.2d 69, 78 , 247 P.3d 421 (2011).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Estate of Bunch v. McGraw Residential Center
Wash. · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Beggs v. Dep’t of Social & Health Servs., 171 Wn.2d 69, 82 , 247 P.3d 421 (2011); Klossner v. San Juan County, 93 Wn.2d 42, 47-48 , 605 P.2d 330 (1980); Armijo, 73 Wn.2d at 720-21 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." ESTATE OF BUNCH v. McGRAW RESIDENTIAL CTR.
Wash. · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Beggs v. Dep't of Social & Health Servs., 171 Wash.2d 69, 82 , 247 P.3d 421 (2011); Klossner v. San Juan County, 93 Wash.2d 42, 47-48 , 605 P.2d 330 (1980); Armijo, 73 Wash.2d at 720-21 , 440 P.2d 471 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MERCER ISLAND CITIZENS FOR FAIR PROCESS, a Washington non-profit corporation, Petitioner,
v.
TENT CITY 4, an unincorporated Washington association; Share/Wheel, an advocacy organization comprised of the Seattle Housing and Resource Effort ("Share") and the Women's Housing Equality And Enhancement League ("Wheel"), a Washington non-profit corporation; Mercer Island United Methodist Church, a Washington nonprofit corporation, and the City of Mercer Island, a Washington municipal corporation, Respondents.
84975-7.
Washington Supreme Court.
Feb 11, 2011.
247 P.3d 421

ORDER

¶ 1 On the January 4, 2011, Motion Calendar, Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Alexander, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, granted the petition for review in this matter. On January 26, 2011, the Petitioner filed a "NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF PETITION FOR REVIEW". The Department having considered the notice, and unanimously determined that the request to withdraw the petition for review should be granted, now, therefore,

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petitioner's request to withdraw the petition for review is granted.

/s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE