green
Positive treatment
11.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Dallas v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1186 (9th Cir.1979) ("remind[ing]" trial courts "that advance planning helps both parties and the court"), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980); United States v. Oakes, 565 F.2d 170, 171 (1st Cir.1977) (stating that a trial court "should, when feasible, make reasonable efforts to accommodate a defendant by ruling in advance on the admissibility of a criminal record so that he can make an informed decision whether or not to testify"); Johnson v. State, 666 So.2d 499, 502 (Miss.1995) (stating that early rulings on motions i…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dave
See United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175 , 1185 n. 8 (9th Cir.1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980), overruled on other grounds in Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38 , 105 S.Ct. 460 , 83 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dave
See United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175 , 1185 n. 8 (9th Cir.1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980), overruled on other grounds in Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38 , 105 S.Ct. 460 , 83 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Radford v. Lovelace
(2×)
Witness's right It is important for us to remember that "both sides have the right to interview witnesses before trial." United States v. Black, 767 F.2d 1334, 1337 (9th Cir.1985); see United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1180 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerald Mark Williams
(2×)
See United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1186 (9th Cir.1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Nichols v. State
See United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1180 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald v. Cloud
See United States v. Toney, 598 F.2d 1349, 1356 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1033 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980) (mail fraud).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Benjamin C. McClelland
(2×)
See United States v. Goldblatt, 813 F.2d 619, 624 (3d Cir.1987) (citing United States v. Toney, 598 F.2d 1349 , 1357 n. 12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1033 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Ira Black
See United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1180 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Givens, Jr.
See United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1186 (9th Cir.1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dunbar, Marty
(2×)
See United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175 (9th Cir.1979) (in banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George Patrick Charmley
See United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1187 (CA9 1979) (in banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Washington
(2×)
See United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1193, 1196-97 (9th Cir.1979) (in banc) (Hufstedler, J., with whom Ely, J., joins, dissenting in part), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980) 2 I have some doubt whether the denial of a motion to exclude impeaching convictions is reviewable in a case such as this where the defendant does not testify.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Gamble
See United States v. Toney, 598 F.2d 1349, 1356 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1033 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Binet
Diaz, 383 Mass. 73, 82 , 417 N.E.2d 950 (1981); see United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1186 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S. Ct. 706 , 62 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Eugene
See United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1184 (9th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rhea Lucky Nichols and Michael Ford, A/K/A L.D. Haufer
(2×)
See United States v. Toney, 598 F.2d 1349 at 1355 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1033 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony R. Fields
See United States v. Johnson, 605 F.2d 1025 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1033 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Troy Gary Saxton, A/K/A David T. Getty
See United States v. To *715 ney, 598 F.2d 1349 (5th Cir. 1979) (two letters of inquiry from victims’ attorney constitute separate offenses), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1033 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980); United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670 (7th Cir.) (separate counts proper for fraudulent insurance claim and a check sent in settlement thereof), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 539 , 66 L.Ed.2d 296 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mohammad Reza Mehrmanesh
See United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175 (9th Cir. 1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mohammed Reza Mehrmanesh
(2×)
See United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1187 (9th Cir. 1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Armando Ochoa-Sanchez
(2×)
See United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1182 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 760 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. York
See United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1181 (9th Cir.1979), cert. den., 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Darrel Leon Burkhead
See United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1186 (9th Cir. 1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 *1286 (1980); United States v. Oakes, 565 F.2d 170, 171 (1st Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Linton
See United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. den. 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980); United States v. Mirenda, 443 F.2d 1351 (9th Cir. 1971); cert. den. 404 U.S. 966 , 92 S.Ct. 343 , 30 L.Ed.2d 286 (1971); United States v. Crouch, 478 F.Supp. 867 (E.D.Cal.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Leslie Love and Mark Anthony Cloyd
See United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1178-79 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1185 (1979) (Federal Rule 609(a)(1) requires the trial judge to weigh the probative value of the impeaching conviction against the prejudice to the defendant), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cummings v. People
(2×)
See also United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1185 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980) (approving the Murray decision on this issue and noting such a rule “encourage[s] counsel to make the motion early in order to obtain pretrial rulings”); 3 J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Draper
See also United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175 (9th Cir.1979) cert. denied 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980); State v. Wise, 101 Ariz. 315 , 419 P.2d 342 (1966); Mota v. Buchanan, 26 Ariz.App. 246 , 547 P.2d 517 (1976); and State v. Chaney, 5 Ariz.App. 530 , 428 P.2d 1004 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
18 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 428, prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,840 Sarah Coursen and Katherine Cook v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation, Terri Johnson, Gayle McCann Laurie Jo Franz, Debbie Rohn, and Pamela Van Duyn v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation
See also United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1186 (9th Cir.1979) (despite the absence of formal offer of proof, the exclusion of evidence is reviewable), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980); United States v. Nevitt, 563 F.2d 406, 409 (9th Cir.1977) (no offer of proof required where court was "fully aware of the substance of the excluded evidence"), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 95 , 62 L.Ed.2d 61 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coursen v. A.H. Robins Co.
See also United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1186 (9th Cir.1979) (despite the absence of formal offer of proof, the exclusion of evidence is reviewable), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980); United States v. Nevitt, 563 F.2d 406, 409 (9th Cir.1977) (no offer of proof required where court was “fully aware of the substance of the excluded evidence”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 95 , 62 L.Ed.2d 61 (1979).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larry Eugene McCollum
(4×)
Compare United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1187 (9th Cir.1979) (en banc) (admission of prior conviction under Rule 609(a)(1) upheld although balancing was “inarticulate” because “appropriate reasons could have been given” for decision to admit), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980), with United States v. Hendershot, 614 F.2d 648, 653 (9th Cir.1980) (admission held erroneous because record left open the possibility that trial court might have applied an incorrect legal standard) and United States v. Mehrmanesh, 689 F.2d 822, 834 (9th Cir.1982) (followin…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Edward Kennedy
Pfingst, supra, at 193 ; Witschner, supra, at 844 ; see also United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1186 (9th Cir.1979) (en banc) (pretrial ruling on admissibility of prior convictions left to discretion of trial court), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Daniel Hamann
See, e.g., United States v. Johnson, 605 F.2d 1025, 1027 (7th Cir. 1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1033 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980); United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381, 389 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977); United States v. Brown, 518 F.2d 821, 826 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 225 , 46 L.Ed.2d 146 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cofield
See, e. g., United States v. Cook, 608 F.2d 1175, 1186 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 706 , 62 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980), which establishes prerequisites to preserve the issue for review.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rivera
v.
Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
v.
Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
No. 79-5589.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 14, 1980.
444 U.S. 1034
Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.