green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
McNair v. McNair
See D'Arc v. D'Arc, 175 N.J.Super. 598, 601 , 421 A. 2d 602 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 85 N.J. 487 , 427 A. 2d 579 (1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed. 2d 350 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mazyck v. Long Island R. Co.(LIRR)
See Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, S.A., 634 F.2d 30, 40 (2d Cir.1980) (holding that inflation should be considered in estimating the present value of lost future wages, and suggesting 2% as an appropriate discount rate), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981); see also DeChico v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 758 F.2d 856, 860-61 (2d Cir.1985) (applying Doca to require discount rate to be adjusted for future inflation in connection with award for future pain and suffering).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stanley v. Bertram-Trojan, Inc.
Wedlock v. Gulf Mississippi Marine Corp., 554 F.2d 240, 243 (5th Cir.1977); see Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, S.A., 634 F.2d 30, 34 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied sub nom., Pittston Stevedoring Corp. v. Doca, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Danny Sellers and Terry Roach
See United States v. Entrekin, 624 F.2d 597, 598-99 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 350 (1981) (shoplifting); 6 United States v. Preston, 608 F.2d 626 , 638 n. 15 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980) (bank robbery); see also Howard v. Gonzales, 658 F.2d 352, 358-59 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981) (theft). 7 But see United States v. Brown, 603 F.2d 1022, 1029 (1st Cir.1979) (holding that burglary and petit larceny have bearing on credibility).
cited
Cited "see"
E. Scott McHenry v. Samuel Chadwick
See United States v. Entrekin, 624 F.2d 597, 598 (5th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 350 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph Oliveri v. Delta Steamship Lines, Inc. And Crowley Maritime Corp., and Third-Party v. Midland-Ross Corporation, Third-Party
See Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, S.A., 634 F.2d 30 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981); see also Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Pfeifer, supra, 462 U.S. at 533-52 , 103 S.Ct. at 2548-58 ; McCrann v. United States Lines, Inc., 803 F.2d 771 (2d Cir.1986); Van Nijenhoff v. Bantry Transportation Co., 791 F.2d 26, 27 (2d Cir.1986); Crane v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 731 F.2d 1042, 1051-52 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 179 , 83 L.Ed.2d 114 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Cunningham v. Quaker Oats Co.
See, Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, S.A., 634 F.2d 30 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981) (suggesting a 2 percent discount rate).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jo Ann Harrelson, Charles Voyed Harrelson and Elizabeth Nichols Chagra
The marital privilege protects “information privately disclosed between husband and wife in the confidence of the marital relationship.” Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40, 51 , 100 S.Ct. 906, 913 , 63 L.Ed.2d 186 (1980). “[Conversations between husband and wife about crimes in which they are jointly participating when the conversations occur are not marital communications for the purpose of the marital privilege, and thus do not fall within the privilege’s protection of confidential marital communications.” United States v. Mendoza, 574 F.2d 1373, 1381 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 4…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Judy Ann Archer and Jerry Vaughn Archer
See United States v. Entrekin, 624 F.2d 597 (5th Cir.1980) (Mendoza unaffected by Trammel), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 350 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shu-Tao Lin v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
See Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, SA., 634 F.2d 30, 34-40 (2d Cir.1980) (suggesting 2% as a minimum inflation-adjusted discount rate), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981); Shatkin v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation and American Airlines, Inc., 565 F.Supp. 93 at 96 (S.D.N.Y.1983) (questioning whether expert estimate of 0.11% real rate of interest was made in good faith).
cited
Cited "see"
Red Star Towing & Transportation Co. v. Ming Giant
See Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, S.A., 634 F.2d 30 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see"
William C. Howard v. V. A. Gonzales
See United States v. Entrekin, 624 F.2d 597 (5th Cir. 1980) (shoplifting), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 350 (1981); United States v. Barnes, 622 F.2d 107, 109-10 (5th Cir. 1980) (shoplifting); United States v. Preston, 608 F.2d 626 , 638 n. 15 (5th Cir. 1979) (bank robbery), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980); United States v. Cathey, 591 F.2d 268 , 276 n.16 (5th Cir. 1979); United States v. Ashley, 569 F.2d 975, 979 (5th Cir. 1978) (shoplifting), cert. den., 439 U.S. 853 , 99 S.Ct. 163 , 58 L.Ed.2d 159 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael A. Picciandra, United States of America v. A. Russell Lucid, Jr.
See Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40, 51 , 100 S.Ct. 906, 912 , 63 L.Ed.2d 186 (1980); see, e.g., United States v. Entrekin, 624 F.2d 597, 598 (5th Cir.1980) (per curiam), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 350 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LeFebre v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
See also Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, S.A., 634 F.2d 30 (2nd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981); Pfeifer v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 678 F.2d 453 (3rd Cir.1982) (overruling Magill v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 464 F.2d 294 (3rd Cir.1972)); Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 688 F.2d 280 (5th Cir.1982) (en banc) (overruling Johnson v. Penrod Drilling Co., 469 F.2d 897 (5th Cir.1972)); Bach v. Penn Central Transportation Co., 502 F.2d 1117, 1122 (6th Cir.1974); O’Shea v. Riverway Towing Co., 677 F.2d 1194 (7th Cir.1982); Riha v. Jasper Blackb…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ruth Culver, Cross-Appellees v. Slater Boat Co., Cross Europirates International, Inc., and Cross- Appellees-Appellants v. Odeco Drilling, Cross
(2×)
Such an approach would mirror that of Feldman v. Allegheny Airlines, 524 F.2d 384 (2d Cir. 1975) (1.5% real return); see also Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, 634 F.2d 30 (2d Cir. 1979) (suggesting using 2% real rate of return), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981). 21 A second variant, the Alaska Rule disparaged by the majority, would treat the inflation and discount rates as offsetting each other totally and therefore cancelling each other out.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barham
v.
Welch
v.
Welch
No. 80-1533.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 4, 1981.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.