green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Veasey v. Perry
(2×)
United States, 885 F.Supp.2d 299, 354 (D.D.C.2012); Rosenstiel v. Rodriguez, 101 F.3d 1544, 1552 (8th Cir.1996); but cf. Busbee v. Smith, 549 F.Supp. 494, 500-03, 508-09, 516-18 (D.D.C.1982), aff'd, 459 U.S. 1166 , 103 S.Ct. 809 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1983) (finding discriminatory intent based in part on overt racial statements made by the chairman of the Georgia redistricting committee who “used the full power of his position and personality to insure passage of his desired Congressional plan”). .
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Ariz. v. Reno
(2×)
See Busbee v. Smith, 549 F.Supp. 494, 516-17 (D.D.C.1982), ajfd, 459 U.S. 1166 , 103 S.Ct. 809 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
State of NY v. United States
(2×)
See Busbee v. Smith, 549 F.Supp. 494, 516 (D.D.C.1982), aff'd mem., 459 U.S. 1166 , 103 S.Ct. 809 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
New York v. United States
(2×)
See Busbee v. Smith, 549 F.Supp. 494, 516 (D.D.C.1982), aff'd mem., 459 U.S. 1166 , 103 S.Ct. 809 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Miller
(2×)
See Busbee v. Smith, 549 F.Supp. 494 (D.D.C.1982), aff'd, 459 U.S. 1166 , 103 S.Ct. 809 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lepore v. National Tool and Mfg. Co.
(2×)
Accord McCarthy v. Bark Perking, 676 F. 2d 42 (2nd Cir.1982), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 459 U.S. 1166 , 103 S.Ct. 809 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 1010 (1983); King v. Fox Grocery Co., 642 F. Supp. 288 (W.D.Pa. 1986); Holmes v. Schneider Power Corp., 628 F. Supp. 937 (W.D.Pa. 1986), aff'd 806 F. 2d 252 (3rd Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
McCarthy v. The Bark Peking, 716 F.2d 130, 131 (2d Cir.1983); see 459 U.S. 1166 , 103 S.Ct. 809 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1983). 17 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Bossier Parish School Bd. v. Reno
(4×)
See also Busbee v. Smith, 549 F.Supp. 494, 516-517 (1982), aff'd 459 U.S. 1166 , 103 S.Ct. 809 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1983).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Shaw v. Hunt
(4×)
See, e.g., Busbee v. Smith, 549 F.Supp. 494, 516 (D.D.C.1982) (three-judge court), aff'd, 459 U.S. 1166 , 103 S.Ct. 809 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1983); see also City of Richmond, 422 U.S. at 372, 378-79 , 95 S.Ct. at 2304-05, 2307-08 . 32 When an earlier version of a state’s redistricting plan is denied preelearance by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on the ground that it fails to satisfy either the “purpose” or “effect” prong of the § 5 test, the state obviously has a “strong basis in evidence” for concluding that the Voting Rights Act requires it to eng…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wiggins ex rel. Wiggins v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
(2×)
Settled law in the area of statutory construction of revised codes, however, indicates that, absent substantive comment, “it is generally held that a change in statutory language during codification is not intended to alter the statute’s scope.” Walters v. Nat’l Ass’n of Radiation Survivors, 473 U.S. 305, 318 , 105 S.Ct. 3180, 3187 , 87 L.Ed.2d 220 (1985) (citing Muniz v. Hoffman, 422 U.S. 454, 467-74 , 95 S.Ct. 2178, 2186-89 , 45 L.Ed.2d 319 (1975)); see also Busbee v. Smith, 549 F.Supp. 494 (D.C.D.C.1982), aff 'd 459 U.S. 1166 , 103 S.Ct. 809 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1983) (revised statu…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In The Matter Of Quanta Resources Corp.
See also In re Kovacs, 681 F.2d 454, 456 (6th Cir.1982) (discussed in Penn Terra, supra, at 277 n. 11), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 459 U.S. 1167 , 103 S.Ct. 810 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1983), on remand sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of New York v. Quanta Resources Corp.
See also In re Kovacs, 681 F.2d 454, 456 (6th Cir.1982) (discussed in Penn Terra, supra, at 277 n. 11), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 459 U.S. 1167 , 103 S.Ct. 810 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1983), on remand sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McCarthy
v.
The Bark Peking
v.
The Bark Peking
No. 82-53.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 1983.
Cited by 49 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Director, [*1167] OWCP v. Perini North River Associates, ante, p. 297.