green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
9.2 score
“when no prior art other than that which was considered by the pto examiner is relied on by the attacker, he has the added burden of overcoming the deference that is due to a qualified government agency presumed to have properly done its job....”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Keller
But see United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984). 10 .
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Knott
But cf. United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1010 (2d Cir.) (federal courts have no inherent power to order restitution or to suspend the imposition of a sentence), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
ASTRAZENECA LP v. Apotex, Inc.
examiners ... are assumed to have some expertise in interpreting the references and to be familiar from their work with the level of skill in the art and whose duty it is to issue only valid patents
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Blackhawk Molding Co., Inc. v. Portola Packaging
when no prior art other than that which was considered by the pto examiner is relied on by the attacker, he has the added burden of overcoming the deference that is due to a qualified government agency presumed to have properly done its job....
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Buckeye Community Hope Foundation v. City of Cuyahoga Falls
we do not read the opinion of the district court as dependent upon the motivation of voters in this referendum for its decision.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Abbott Laboratories, Andrew J. Muetterties and Joseph N. Genese, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. John F. Brennan
patent rights are not legal monopolies in the antitrust sense of that word
cited
Cited "see"
United States Filter Corp. v. Ionics, Inc.
See American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, 725 F.2d 1350, 1359-60 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Holt Cargo Systems, Inc. v. Delaware River Port Authority
See United States v. City of Birmingham, 538 F.Supp. 819 (E.D.Mich.1982), aff'd, 727 F.2d 560 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Geffner v. Linear Rotary Bearings, Inc.
See American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., 725 F.2d 1350, 1362-63 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Nazon
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009-10 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Farid Ali
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lilly
Since probation, like a shadow, always accompanies a suspended sentence, see 18 U.S.C.A. § 3651 (West 1985) (court “may suspend the imposition or execution of the sentence and place the defendant on probation”) (emphasis supplied); see United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1010-11 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984) (suspended sentence without probation a nullity); McHugh v. United States, 230 F.2d 252, 255 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 966 , 76 S.Ct. 1030 , 100 L.Ed. 1486 (1956) (suspension of sentence required to support order of probation);…
cited
Cited "see"
EI DuPont De Nemours and Co. v. Monsanto Co.
See American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, 725 F.2d 1350, 1359 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Schneider (Europe) AG v. SciMed Life Systems, Inc.
See American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., 725 F.2d 1350, 1359 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Thornton v. City of Allegan
See United States v. City of Birmingham, 727 F.2d 560, 562-63 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert L. Mendenhall, and Cmi Corporation v. Cedarapids, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant
(2×)
See American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., 725 F.2d 1350, 1359-60 , 220 USPQ 763, 770-71 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven E. Rogers
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1008-09 (2d Cir.) (fraudulent verification letter sent to Government two years after defendant had received improperly obtained money from Government was part of scheme to defraud Government), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Ches v. Archer
See Bugher v. Feightner, 722 F.2d 1356 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 98 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brooktree Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
See American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., 725 F.2d 1350, 1359 , 220 USPQ 763, 770 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984); Interconnect Planning Corp. v. Feil, 774 F.2d 1132, 1139 , 227 USPQ 543, 548 (Fed.Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Scott
See United States v. City of Birmingham, 538 F.Supp. 819, 830 (E.D.Mich.1982), aff'd and modified as to relief, 727 F.2d 560 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Estate of Stoller v. Ford Motor Co.
See American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, 725 F.2d 1350, 1360 , 220 U.S.P.Q. 763, 771 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984); Oak, 726 F.Supp. at 1530 , 14 U.S.P.Q.2d at 1420 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leona M. Helmsley, Joseph v. Licari and Frank J. Turco, Leona M. Helmsley
(2×)
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1010-11 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul A. Bilzerian
(2×)
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984); United States v. Silver, 235 F.2d 375, 377 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 880 , 77 S.Ct. 102 , 1 L.Ed.2d 80 (1956).
cited
Cited "see"
Oregon Laborers-Employers Trust Funds v. Pacific Fence & Wire Co.
See Bugher v. Feightner, 722 F.2d 1356, 1360 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 98 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
See American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., 725 F.2d 1350, 1360 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984); DuPont, 656 F.Supp. at 1354.
cited
Cited "see"
Polysius Corp. v. Fuller Co.
See American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, 725 F.2d 1350, 1358 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984). 7 . <20-m in Taggart means less than 20 mesh.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Elston Ransom
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1011 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Phillips 66 Company, and Phillips Driscopipe, Inc., Defendants-Cross-Appellants
See American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., 725 F.2d 1350, 1360 , 220 USPQ 763, 771 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kelly
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1010 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff v. Linda Ann Digregorio
See Bugher v. Feightner, 722 F.2d 1356, 1360 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 98 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Turoff
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1008 (2d Cir.), (late mailing lulled victim of scheme into believing all was well), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984); United States v. Pick, 724 F.2d 297, 300 (2d Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Custom Accessories, Inc. v. Jeffrey-Allan Industries, Inc.
Accord American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., 725 F.2d 1350, 1364 , 220 USPQ 763, 774 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984) (upon reissue in light of prior art before the district court, the "burden of proof of unpatentability has become more difficult to sustain”). 23 .
cited
Cited "see"
Swanigan v. Western Airlines, Inc.
See Hodges v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., 728 F.2d 414, 417 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Barrett
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009 (2d Cir.) (and cases cited there *1351 in), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Whitehall Corp. v. Western Geophysical Co. of America
See American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., 725 F.2d 1350, 1362-64 , 220 U.S.P.Q. 763, 772-774 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Windsurfing International, Inc. v. Amf, Incorporated, Bic Leisure Products, Inc., Windglider Fred Ostermann, Gmbh, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Windsurfing International, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant. Windsurfing International, Inc., Cross-Appellant/appellee v. Fred Ostermann Gmbh, Amf, Inc., Downwind Corp., and Freeboard Sailing, Inc., Cross-Appellees/appellants
The district court carefully considered whether the evidence not presented in the "fiercely contested adversarial proceeding" before the Board would ease AMF's burden of proving facts compelling a conclusion of invalidity. 6 613 F.Supp. at 943-45 , 227 USPQ at 935-36; see American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., 725 F.2d 1350, 1359-60 , 220 USPQ 763, 770 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cable Electric Products, Inc. v. Genmark, Inc., A/K/A Diablo Products Corp.
See American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, 725 F.2d 1350 ,. 1366-67, 220 USPQ 763, 775-76 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984) (the necessity of showing relevant market to establish a section 2 Sherman *1033 Act violation); Bandag, Inc. v. Al Bolser’s Tire Stores, Inc., 750 F.2d 903, 909 , 223 USPQ 982, 986 (Fed.Cir.1984) (infringement of federally registered trademarks).
cited
Cited "see"
Illinois ex rel. Schoepf v. Board of Education
See Lewis v. Hillsborough Transit Authority, 726 F.2d 664 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
TRUSTEES OF THE REFRIGERATION AIR CONDITIONING & SERVICE DIVISION (UA-NJ) PENSION FUND, WELFARE FUND, ANNUITY FUND, EDUCATION FUND, INDUSTRY FUND AND INTERNATIONAL TRAINING FUNDS v. P.J.M. MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC.
See, e.g., Bugher v. Feightner, 722 F.2d 1356 (7th Cir, 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Institut Pasteur v. Cambridge Biotech Corp. (In Re Cambridge Biotech Corp.)
See, e.g., American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Son’s, Inc., 725 F.2d 1350 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, Sowa & Sons, Inc. v. American Hoist & Derrick Co., 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984) (placing burden on party attacking patent’s validity on grounds of obviousness).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ethicon, Inc. v. United States Surgical Corp.
Mar. 15, 1991); see also American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., 725 F.2d 1350, 1364 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, Sowa & Sons, Inc. v. American Hoist & Derrick Co., 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Valmet Paper MacHinery, Inc. v. Beloit Corp.
See, e.g., American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., 725 F.2d 1350, 1359 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Della WHITE, Roy S. White, Defendants-Appellants
Compare United States v. Pruitt, 702 F.2d 152, 155 (8th Cir. *1535 1983) (holding that materiality is an essential element of a section 287 charge) and United States v. Snider, 502 F.2d 645 , 652 n. 12 (4th Cir.1974) (same) with United States v. Parsons, 967 F.2d 452, 455 (10th Cir.1992) (“[M]ateriality is not an element required by 18 U.S.C. § 287”) and United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009 (2d Cir.) (“Since the language of § 287 in no way suggests that materiality is an element of the offense, we conclude that proof of materiality was not required.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 8…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Casa Marie, Inc. v. Superior Court of Puerto Rico for the District of Arecibo, Casa Marie, Inc. v. Superior Court of Puerto Rico for the District of Arecibo, Esther Rivera Santos
See, e.g., United States v. Birmingham, 727 F.2d 560, 562 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984); Smith v. Town of Clarkton, 682 F.2d 1055, 1065 (4th Cir.1982). 20 On the other hand, no liability arises under Title VIII absent a sufficient causal link between the defendants' discriminatory actions and the threatened injury to the plaintiffs.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Casa Marie, Inc. v. Superior Court of Puerto Rico for the District of Arecibo
See, e.g., United States v. Birmingham, 727 F.2d 560, 562 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984); Smith v. Town of Clarkton, 682 F.2d 1055, 1065 (4th Cir.1982). 20 On the other hand, no liability arises under Title VIII absent a sufficient causal link between the defendants’ discriminatory actions and the threatened injury to the plaintiffs.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michigan Protection & Advocacy Service, Inc. v. Babin
See e.g., United States v. Birmingham, 727 F.2d 560, 561 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984); United States v. Black Jack, 508 F.2d 1179, 1188 (8th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1042 , 95 S.Ct. 2656 , 45 L.Ed.2d 694 (1975). 56 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Standard Manufacturing Co. v. United States
Co., 810 F.2d at 1569-70 (footnote & citation omitted); see also American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., 725 F.2d 1350, 1359 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen International Union Local 33 Benefit Funds v. America's Marble Source, Inc.
See, e.g., Bugher v. Feightner, 722 F.2d 1356 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 98 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bricklayers And Allied Craftsmen International Union Local 33 Benefit Funds v. America's Marble Source, Inc.
See, e.g., Bugher v. Feightner, 722 F.2d 1356 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 98 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Crucible Materials Corp. v. Sumitomo Special Metals Co.
See, e.g., American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., 725 F.2d 1350, 1359 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lewis
v.
Hillsborough Transit Authority
v.
Hillsborough Transit Authority
No. 83-1830.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.