Hodges v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 469 U.S. 822 (1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Hodges v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 469 U.S. 822 (1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
65 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 25 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Nazon (innd, 1996-08-07) · Strongest negative: United States v. Keller (ilnd, 1990-01-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" United States v. Keller
N.D. Ill. · 1990 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984). 10 .
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Knott
E.D. Va. · 1989 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1010 (2d Cir.) (federal courts have no inherent power to order restitution or to suspend the imposition of a sentence), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Nazon
N.D. Ind. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009-10 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Farid Ali
2d Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Lilly
D. Mass. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
Since probation, like a shadow, always accompanies a suspended sentence, see 18 U.S.C.A. § 3651 (West 1985) (court “may suspend the imposition or execution of the sentence and place the defendant on probation”) (emphasis supplied); see United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1010-11 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984) (suspended sentence without probation a nullity); McHugh v. United States, 230 F.2d 252, 255 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 966 , 76 S.Ct. 1030 , 100 L.Ed. 1486 (1956) (suspension of sentence required to support order of probation);…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Steven E. Rogers
2d Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1008-09 (2d Cir.) (fraudulent verification letter sent to Government two years after defendant had received improperly obtained money from Government was part of scheme to defraud Government), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Leona M. Helmsley, Joseph v. Licari and Frank J. Turco, Leona M. Helmsley (2×)
2d Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1010-11 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Paul A. Bilzerian (2×)
2d Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984); United States v. Silver, 235 F.2d 375, 377 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 880 , 77 S.Ct. 102 , 1 L.Ed.2d 80 (1956).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Elston Ransom
2d Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1011 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Kelly
S.D.N.Y. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1010 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Turoff
E.D.N.Y · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1008 (2d Cir.), (late mailing lulled victim of scheme into believing all was well), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984); United States v. Pick, 724 F.2d 297, 300 (2d Cir.1983).
cited Cited "see" Swanigan v. Western Airlines, Inc.
Minn. Ct. App. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hodges v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., 728 F.2d 414, 417 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Barrett
D. Vt. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009 (2d Cir.) (and cases cited there *1351 in), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited Cited "see" United States v. A. Wendell Wheadon
7th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1010 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ianniello
S.D.N.Y. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1008-09 (2d Cir.), cert.denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Della WHITE, Roy S. White, Defendants-Appellants
11th Cir. · 1994 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Pruitt, 702 F.2d 152, 155 (8th Cir. *1535 1983) (holding that materiality is an essential element of a section 287 charge) and United States v. Snider, 502 F.2d 645 , 652 n. 12 (4th Cir.1974) (same) with United States v. Parsons, 967 F.2d 452, 455 (10th Cir.1992) (“[M]ateriality is not an element required by 18 U.S.C. § 287”) and United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009 (2d Cir.) (“Since the language of § 287 in no way suggests that materiality is an element of the offense, we conclude that proof of materiality was not required.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 8…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." GLM CORP. v. Klein
S.D.N.Y. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
For example, the use of the mails can be held to have been “for the purpose of executing” an alleged fraudulent scheme if accomplishing the scheme’s purpose could be found to have depended in some way on the information and documents which were passed through the mail, i.e., if “the thing mailed was an integral part of execution of the scheme....” United States v. Kent, 608 F.2d 542, 546 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 936 , 100 S.Ct. 2153 , 64 L.Ed. 2d 788 (1980); see also United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1008-09 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83…
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Perlmutter
S.D.N.Y. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. James Charles Cannon, in Re United States of America
11th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 41-52, 37 S.Ct. at 74-78 ; see also United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1010 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984) (absent statutory authority, a court may not decline to impose a sentence).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bento v. ITO Corp. of Rhode Island
D.R.I. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hodges v. The Atcheson, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., 728 F.2d 414, 416 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984) Ernst v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co., Inc., 717 F.2d 1036, 1038 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. - — , 104 S.Ct. 707 , 79 L.Ed.2d 171 (1984); Painter v. Horne Bros., Inc., 710 F.2d 143, 144 (4th Cir.1983); Meyerson v. Arizona, 709 F.2d 1235, 1238 (9th Cir. 1983), vacated on other grounds, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1584 , 80 L.Ed.2d 118 (1984); Davis v. Ohio Barge Line, Inc., 697 F.2d 549, 556 (3rd Cir.1983); Davis v. United Air Line…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hodges
v.
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
No. 83-1849.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
469 U.S. 822
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.