green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Kenneth Beshears, Robert Johnson v. Ross Asbill v. Communications Services, Inc., Kenneth Beshears, Robert Johnson, Ross Asbill v. Communications Services, Inc.
But see Smith v. Office of Personnel Management, 778 F.2d 258, 262-63 (5th Cir.1985) (holding that the collateral source rule is inapplicable when the defendant is the source of the benefit at issue, the court affirmed the offset of disability compensation as within the discretion of the trial court), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1949 , 90 L.Ed.2d 358 (1986). 37 We adopt the "fact issue" approach articulated by the Tenth Circuit in Spulak.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Beshears v. Asbill
But see Smith v. Office of Personnel Management, 778 F.2d 258, 262-63 (5th Cir.1985) (holding that the collateral source rule is inapplicable when the defendant is the source of the benefit at issue, the court affirmed the offset of disability compensation as within the discretion of the trial court), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1949 , 90 L.Ed.2d 358 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas R. Lussier v. Marvin Runyon, United States Postmaster General, Thomas R. Lussier v. Marvin Runyon, United States Postmaster General
See Smith v. OPM, 778 F.2d 258, 263 (5th Cir.1985) (suggesting that the collateral source rule may lack force “when the collateral source is the defendant”), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1949 , 90 L.Ed.2d 358 (1986); Enterprise Ass’n Steamfitters, 542 F.2d at 591 (similar); Olivas v. United *1111 States, 506 F.2d 1158, 1163-64 (9th Cir.1974) (similar); see also 2 Dobbs, supra, § 8.6(2), at 491.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kohn v. Mucia
See Tedeschi v. Blackwood, 410 F.Supp. 34 , 45 n. 15 (D.Conn.1976) (cited in Miller v. City of Chicago, 774 F.2d 188, 192-93 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1949 , 90 L.Ed.2d 358 (1986)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Long v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
See Smith v. Office of Personnel Management, 778 F.2d 258 (5th Cir.1985) (Age Discrimination in Employment Act), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1949 , 90 L.Ed.2d 358 (1986); Graves Trucking, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 692 F.2d 470, 475 (7th Cir.1982) (National Labor Relations Act); Shuttleworth v. Broward County, 649 F.Supp. 35 (S.D.Fla.1986) (Rehabilitation Act).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Office of Personnel Management
See Smith v. Office of Personnel Management, 778 F.2d 258 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1949 , 90 L.Ed.2d 358 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrew W. Hansard, Cross-Appellant v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc., D/B/A Pepsi-Cola Bottling Group, Cross-Appellee
See Smith v. Office of Personnel Management, 778 F.2d 258 , 262 n. 2 (5th Cir.1985) (“[W]e note that ... where the plaintiff is unable as a result of discrimination to earn his livelihood, an award of front pay probably would be necessary to ‘effectuate the purposes of the Act,’” quoting 29 U.S.C. § 626 (b) (1982)), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1949 , 90 L.Ed.2d 358 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Rattner v. Bennett
See Smith v. Office of Personnel Mgmt., 778 F.2d 258, 260-61 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1949 , 90 L.Ed.2d 358 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grandison v. United States Postal Service
Accord, Smith v. Office of Personnel Management, 778 F.2d 258, 263 (5th Cir. 1985) (“Liquidated damages are permitted only in private sector cases in which the employer's conduct is willful.”), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1949 , 90 L.Ed.2d 358 (1986); Endres v. Helms, 617 F.Supp. 1260 , 1269 n. 23 (D.D.C.1985) (citing cases).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
M & Z CAB CORP. v. City of Chicago
See e.g., Miller v. City of Chicago, 774 F.2d 188, 191 (7th Cir.1985) (noting that “pre-deprivation notice and hearing represent the norm”), cert denied, 476 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1949 , 90 L.Ed.2d 358 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arnett v. Aspin
Blum v. Witco Chemical Corp., 829 F.2d 367, 376 (3d Cir.1987); Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co., 550 F.2d 834 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 770 (1978); see also Smith v. Office of Personnel Management, 778 F.2d 258, 261 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1949 , 90 L.Ed.2d 358 (1986); Haskel v. Kaman Corp., 743 F.2d 113 (2d Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Minnie M. Honeycutt v. John E. Long, Major General Commander, Army and Air Force Exchange Service
(2×)
Lehman v. Nakshian, 453 U.S. 156 , 168 n. 15, 101 S.Ct. 2698 , 2705 n. 15, 69 L.Ed.2d 548 (1981) (“measures used to protect Federal employees [from age discrimination] would be substantially similar to those” in Title VII); Oscar Mayer & Co. v. Evans, 441 U.S. 750, 756 , 99 S.Ct. 2066, 2071 , 60 L.Ed.2d 609 (1979) (stating the parallel provisions of the ADEA should be construed consistently with Title VII); see also Smith v. Office of Personnel Management, 778 F.2d 258, 262 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1949 , 90 L.Ed.2d 358 (1986) (stating Title VII case law will…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
Office of Personnel Management
v.
Office of Personnel Management
No. 85-1521.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 5, 1986.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.