green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Copeland v. United States
See Marlow v. U.S. Dept. of Educ., 820 F.2d 581, 582-83 (2nd Cir.1987) cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1044 , 108 S.Ct. 780 , 98 L.Ed.2d 866 (1988) (finding review of Department of Education’s determination that Board of Education had not discriminated against plaintiff is not reviewable under APA because relevant section of Rehabilitation Act “provides no express guidelines for such a decision and indeed neither the statute nor regulations impose significant substantive limitations on the Department’s investigation and resolution of individual complaints of discrimination”); West v. Jackson, 5…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marinoff v. US DEPT. OF HUD
Id. at 832-34 , 105 S.Ct. at 1656-57 ; see also Marlow v. U.S. Dept. of Educ., 820 F.2d 581, 582-83 (2d Cir.1987) (review of Department of Education's determination that Board of Education had not discriminated against plaintiff not reviewable under APA because relevant section of Rehabilitation Act "provides no express guidelines for such a decision and indeed neither the statute nor the regulations impose significant substantive limitations on the Department's investigation and resolution of individual complaints of discrimination"), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1044 , 108 S.Ct. 780 , 98 L.Ed.2d 8…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marinoff v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
Id. at 832-34 , 105 S.Ct. at 1656-57 ; see also Marlow v. U.S. Dept. of Educ., 820 F.2d 581, 582-83 (2d Cir.1987) (review of Department of Education’s determination that Board of Education had not discriminated against plaintiff not reviewable under APA because relevant section of Rehabilitation Act "provides no express guidelines for such a decision and indeed neither the statute nor the regulations impose significant substantive limitations on the Department's investigation and resolution of individual complaints of discrimination"), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1044 , 108 S.Ct. 780 , 98 L.Ed.2d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Cousins v. Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation
Compare Baker v. Bell, 630 F.2d 1046, 1055-57 (5th Cir.1980) (finding private cause of action against provider directly under section 504) with Marlow v. U.S. Dept. of Educ., 820 F.2d 581 *45 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 780 , 98 L.Ed.2d 866 (1988) (refusing to find private cause of action against provider directly under section 504); Salvador v. Bennett, 800 F.2d 97 (7th Cir.1986) (same). 12 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marlow
v.
United States Department of Education
v.
United States Department of Education
No. 87-5938.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1988.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.