green
Positive treatment
12.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
ca8 1995
The Second Circuit approved "secure transportation for the jurors to and from court" as well as "substantial numbers of armed guards on the premises" in United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F.2d 934, 971 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 1233, 111 S.Ct. 2811 , 2858, 115 L.Ed.2d 984, 1025, 1026 (1991), a case involving four defendants tried for conspiracy to commit an armed bank robbery.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Darden
The Second Circuit approved “secure transportation for the jurors to and from court” as well as “substantial numbers of armed guards on the premises” in United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F.2d 934, 971 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 1233, 111 S.Ct. 2811 , 2858, 115 L.Ed.2d 984, 1025, 1026 (1991), a ease involving four defendants tried for conspiracy to commit an armed bank robbery.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Victor J. Orena, Also Known as Little Vic
Rule 801(d)(2)(E) provides that: “A statement is not hearsay if ... [it] is offered against a party and is ... a statement made by a coconspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.” In order to admit evidence pursuant to Rule 801(d)(2)(E), the district court must find by a preponderance of the evidence “that there was a conspiracy involving the declarant and the nonoffering party, and that the statement was made ‘during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.’ ” Bourjaily v. United States, 483 U.S. 171, 175-76 , 107 S.Ct. 2775, 2778 , 97 L.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. NEW YORK STATE DEPT. OF CORREC. SERVICES
See Dube v. State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 , 594-95 (2d Cir.1990) (recognizing that § 1983 does not abrogate the states' Eleventh Amendment immunity), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
See Dube v. State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 , 594-95 (2d Cir.1990) (recognizing that § 1983 does not abrogate the states’ Eleventh Amendment immunity), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Velazquez v. Poole
(2×)
See United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F.2d 934 , 973 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2811 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991); Jones v. Ricks, No. 02 CV 2719, 2004 WL 212908 , at *4 (E.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William C. Campbell
(2×)
See United States v. Moscony, 927 F.2d 742, 750 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2812 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sampson
(2×)
See United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 27 (1st Cir.) (Opinion by Breyer, J., rejecting distinction based on fact that containers left on defendant’s lawn and not on curb itself), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2813 , 115 L.Ed.2d 985 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Emma v. Schenectady City School District
Accord Dube v. State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 , 599 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied sub nom., Wharton v. Dube, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harel v. Rutgers, State University
See Dube v. State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 (2d Cir.1990), cert, denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991); ‘Goodisman v. Lytle, 724 F.2d 818 (9th Cir.1984); Beitzell v. Jeffrey, 643 F.2d 870 (1st Cir. 1981); Kilcoyne v. Morgan, 664 F.2d 940 (4th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1976 , 72 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Elson
(2×)
See United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F.2d 934, 966 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2811 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991); United States v. Keuylian, 602 F.2d 1033, 1038 (2d Cir.1979); United States v. Spy Factory Inc., 951 F.Supp. 450, 455-56 (S.D.N.Y.1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hart-Williams
(2×)
See United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F.2d 934, 969 (2d Cir.1990) (Kearse, J.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2811 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991), and 501 U.S. 1233 , 111 S.Ct. 2858 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1025 (1991); United States v. Kaytso, 868 F.2d 1020, 1021 (9th Cir.1988); United States v. Griley, 814 F.2d 967, 973 (4th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum
(2×)
See United States v. Moscony, 927 F.2d 742, 752 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2812 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991); Griffith v. Davis, 161 F.R.D. 687, 694-95 (C.D.Cal.1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Spy Factory, Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Maldo *456 nado-Rivera, 922 F.2d 934, 966 (2d Cir.1990) (“No one of these considerations [the Platt factors] is dispositive, and ‘it remains for the court to try to strike a balance and determine which factors are of greatest importance.’ ”) (citing United States v. Stephenson, 895 F.2d 867, 875 (2d Cir.1990)), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2811 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodriguez
See United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 24 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2813 , 115 L.Ed.2d 985 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Manning
See United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 25-26 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2813 , 115 L.Ed.2d 985 (1991), and overruled on other grounds by Bailey, - U.S. at -, 116 S.Ct. at 509 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Manning
See United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22 , 25-26 ___ _____________ _________ (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 (1991), and overruled _____ ______ ___ _________ on other grounds by Bailey, 116 S. Ct. at 509 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Andreucci v. City of New Haven
See Dube v. State Univ. of N.Y., 900 F.2d 587 , 599 (2d Cir.1990) (entitlement to consideration of criteria not a protected interest), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991); see also Gotlob v. Beyard, 887 F.Supp. 26, 30 (D.Conn.1993) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bruce N. Wilkinson
(2×)
See United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F.2d 934, 950 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2811 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Griswold v. Com.
See United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22 (1st Cir.) (court relying in part on presentence report which indicated that defendant was represented by counsel), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2813 , 115 L.Ed.2d 985 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Griswold v. Commonwealth
See United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22 (1st Cir.) (court relying in part on presentence report which indicated that defendant was represented by counsel), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 (1991).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard O. Bertoli
(4×)
See United States v. Moscony, 927 F.2d 742, 754 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2812 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991). 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alex Wong, Roger Kwok, Chen I. Chung, Tung Tran, Danny Ngo, Brian Chan, Joseph Wang, Chiang T. Cheng, and Steven Ng
(2×)
See United States v. Moscony, 927 F.2d 742, 754 (3d Cir.) (substantive RICO is continuing offense analogous to conspiracy), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2812 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991); United States v. Rastelli, 870 F.2d 822, 838 (2d Cir.) (RICO conspiracy not complete until purposes accomplished or abandoned), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 982 , 110 S.Ct. 515 , 107 L.Ed.2d 516 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Field
See United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 29 (1st Cir.) (applying Taylor), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2813 , 115 L.Ed.2d 985 (1991).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Allan Ross
(4×)
See United States v. Moscony, 927 F.2d 742, 750 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2812 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tortora
(2×)
See United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F.2d 934, 973 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2811 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 , and cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1233 , 111 S.Ct. 2858 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1025 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tortora
(2×)
See United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F.2d 934, 973 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2811 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 , and cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1233 , 111 S.Ct. 2858 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1025 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Pitera
See United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F.2d 934, 950 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2811 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991). 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bennett
See United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F.2d 934 (2nd Cir.1990), cert, denied, — U.S. -, -, 111 S.Ct. 2811 , 2858, 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991) (19-day delay); United States v. Diana, 605 F.2d 1307 (4th Cir.1979) (39-day delay), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980); United States v. Angelini, 565 F.2d 469 (7th Cir.1977) (nine-to 26-day delay), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1487 , 55 L.Ed.2d 517 (1977); United States v. Poeta, 455 F.2d 117 (2nd Cir.1972), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S.Ct. 2041 , 32 L.Ed.2d 337 (1972) (13-day delay); United States v. Pe…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Friedman
See United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F.2d 934, 978 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2811 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Friedman
See United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F.2d 934, 978 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2811 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991). 37 Lachterman also challenges his sentence, arguing that he is entitled to a reduction for acceptance of responsibility because he plead guilty to a state charge based on his 1989 arrest for burglary.
discussed
Cited "see"
Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.
See Dube v. State University of New York, 900 F. 2d 587, 594 (CA2 1990), cert. denied, 501 U. S. 1211 (1991); Coakley v. Welch, 877 F 2d 304 , 306 (CA4), cert. denied, 493 U. S. 976 (1989); Chrissy F. v. Mississippi Dept. of Pub.
discussed
Cited "see"
North River Insurance v. Philadelphia Reinsurance Corp.
See United States v. Moscony, 927 F.2d 742, 753 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2812 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991); In re Bevill, Bresler & Schulman Asset Management Corp., 805 F.2d 120 , 126 (3d Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alex
See United States v. Moscony, 927 F.2d 742, 749 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2812 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. Rao
Bd. of Trs., 597 F.2d 1104 , 1109 (7th Cir.1979); see also Dube v. The State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991); Goodisman v. Lytle, 724 F.2d 818 (9th Cir.1984); Beitzell v. Jeffrey, 643 F.2d 870 (1st Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bryant v. New York State Department of Correction Services Albany
The Report correctly concludes that “it is beyond dispute that the State of New York and its agencies have never consented to be sued in federal court.” 5 Report at 4; See also Dube v. State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 , 594-95 (2d Cir.1990), cert denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kouri-Perez
(2×)
See also United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, 922 *27 F.2d 934, 966-67 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 1233, 111 S.Ct. 2811 , 2858, 115 L.Ed.2d 984, 1025 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kourí-Pérez
(2×)
See also United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F.2d 934, 966-67 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 1233, 111 S.Ct. 2811 , 2858, 115 L.Ed.2d 984,1025 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Scarfo
(2×)
The court forewarned the defendants, citing the law of the Third Circuit, that ‘it would be a rare case in which a defendant, after convincing the trial court not to disqualify his attorney of choice, should be able to obtain a reversal of his conviction on the basis of a conflict of interests.’ See United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084 , 1143 n. 84 (3rd Cir.1990), cert, denied, 500 U.S. 915 , 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991); see also United States v. Moscony, 927 F.2d 742 , 749 n. 10 (3rd Cir.), cert, denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2812 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991) (citation omi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John D. Rogers
(2×)
Compare United States v. Stephens, 964 F.2d 424, 427 (5th Cir. 1992) (holding that an overt act is required) with United States v. Tormos-Vega, 959 F.2d 1103, 1115 (1st Cir.) (stating that no overt act is required), cer t. denied, 506 U.S. 866 , 113 S.Ct. 191 , 121 L.Ed.2d 135 (1992) and United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F.2d 934, 983 (2d Cir. 1990) (same), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2811 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991), and cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1233 , 111 S.Ct. 2858 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
LaFleur v. Wallace State Community College
See also Dube v. State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 , 594 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Esteban Lozano-Reyes, AKA Steve Lozano
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F.2d 934, 959 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jungels v. State University College of New York
Id. at 102-03 , 104 S.Ct. at 909 ; see also, Dube v. State University of New York, 900 F.2d 587, 595 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Felipe Ramirez-Ferrer, United States v. Jorge L. Suarez-Maya, United States v. Raul Troche-Matos
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 25-26 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2813 , 115 L.Ed.2d 985 (1991). 12 The panel had more difficulty with the question of whether a reasonable jury could find that each of the defendants knew that the gun was present; unlike the drugs, the gun was not in plain view.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Everett W. Thompson, Jr.
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Maldonado-Rivera (“Maldonado-Rivera”), 922 F.2d 934, 962-63 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2811 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991); United States v. Barlin, 686 F.2d 81, 89 (2d Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Juan Paul Robertson, United States of America v. Juan Paul Robertson
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Moscony, 927 F.2d 742, 754 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2812 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991); United States v. Cusack, 901 F.2d 29, 32 (4th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patsy Mays (94-6473) and Samuel W. Mays (94-6480)
(2×)
Wheat v. United States, 486 U.S. 153, 164 , 108 S.Ct. 1692, 1699-1700 , 100 L.Ed.2d 140 (1988); See also United States v. Moscony, 927 F.2d 742, 750 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2812 , 115 L.Ed.2d 984 (1991)(cross-examination of former clients inherently involves a conflict of interest). 2.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Komlosi v. New York State Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546-47 , 69 S.Ct. 1221, 1225-26 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949), the Supreme Court has expressly “h[e]ld that States and state entities that claim to be ‘arms of the State’ may take advantage of the collateral order doctrine to appeal a district court order denying a claim of Eleventh Amendment immunity.” Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, — U.S.-,-, 113 S.Ct. 684, 689 , 121 L.Ed.2d 605 (1993); see also Dube v. State Univ., 900 F.2d 587 , 594 (2d Cir.1990) (such an appeal may be taken if issue can be decided as a question of law) (collecting cases)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Komlosi v. The New York State Office Of Mental Retardation And Developmental Disabilities
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546-47 , 69 S.Ct. 1221, 1225-26 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949), the Supreme Court has expressly "h[e]ld that States and state entities that claim to be 'arms of the State' may take advantage of the collateral order doctrine to appeal a district court order denying a claim of Eleventh Amendment immunity." Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, --- U.S. ----, ----, 113 S.Ct. 684, 689 , 121 L.Ed.2d 605 (1993); see also Dube v. State Univ., 900 F.2d 587 , 594 (2d Cir.1990) (such an appeal may be taken if issue can be decided as a question of law) (collecting cases)…
Ramirez-Talavera
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-7967.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 10, 1991.
Cited by 139 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.