green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Brett E. Lang v. United States
See United States v. Straughter, 950 F.2d 1223, 1232 (6th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1119 and 503 U.S. 948 and 976 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Staula
See United States v. Arache, 946 F.2d 129, 138 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 948 , 112 S.Ct. 1507 , 117 L.Ed.2d 645 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Koubriti
See also, United States v. Arache, 946 F.2d 129 (1st Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 503 U.S. 948 , 112 S.Ct. 1507 , 117 L.Ed.2d 645 (1992) (holding that double jeopardy did not bar retrial after the grant of defendant’s motion for new trial where no finding had been made that *672 the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction.) Although this case is somewhat different in that the Court did not grant a new trial on the material support to terrorism conspiracy charged in Count One of the Third Superseding Indictment but rather dismissed that charge, without prejudice, the fact rem…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Martin
For example, the enhancement would not be applied if the defendant, arrested at his residence, had an unloaded hunting rifle in the closet.” U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 comment, (n. 3); see also United States v. Moreno, 899 F.2d 465, 470 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 948 , 112 S.Ct. 1504 , 117 L.Ed.2d 643 (1992); United States v. Cochran, 14 F.3d 1128, 1132 (6th Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williams
For example, the enhancement would not be applied if the defendant, arrested at his residence, had an unloaded hunting rifle in the closet. 11 U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 commentary, applic. note 3; see also United States v. Moreno, 899 F.2d 465, 470 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 948 , 112 S.Ct. 1504 , 117 L.Ed.2d 643 (1992); United States v. Cochran, 14 F.3d 1128, 1132 (6th Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williams
U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 commentary, applic. note 3; see also United States v. Moreno, 899 F.2d 465, 470 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 948 , 112 S.Ct. 1504 , 117 L.Ed.2d 643 (1992); United States v. Cochran, 14 F.3d 1128, 1132 (6th Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Malcolm Earl Thomas
See also United States v. Straughter, 950 F.2d 1223, 1232-33 (6th Cir.1991) (rejecting defendant’s challenge to the qualification of a detective as an expert on the pricing of cocaine), ce rt. denied, 502 U.S. 1119 , 112 S.Ct. 1238 , 117 L.Ed.2d 471 (1992), and cert. denied, 503 U.S. 948 , 112 S.Ct. 1505 , 117 L.Ed.2d 643 (1992), and cert. denied, 503 U.S. 976 , 112 S.Ct. 1601 , 118 L.Ed.2d 315 (1992); United States v. Gastiaburo, 16 F.3d 582, 588-89 (4th Cir.) (upholding the admission of law enforcement officer’s expert testimony concerning modus operandi of drug dealers and intent to dis…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ashok C. Shah Jyoti A. Shah
See also United States v. Moreno, 899 F.2d 465, 473 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 948 (1992); United States v. Miller, 910 F.2d 1321, 1327 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1094 (1991) (holding that related conduct can be considered in determining the sentence).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Moreno
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 91-7268.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 23, 1992.
503 U.S. 948
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.