green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Cassel v. Kolb
See In re Atchison, 925 F.2d 209 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied sub nom, Jones v. Atchison, 502 U.S. 860 , 112 S.Ct. 178 , 116 L.Ed.2d 140 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas J. Maloney
(2×)
"This section of RICO is capable of providing for the linkage in one proceeding of a number of otherwise distinct crimes and/or conspiracies through the concept of enterprise conspiracy." United States v. Neapolitan, 791 F.2d 489, 501 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 940 , 107 S.Ct. 422 , 93 L.Ed.2d 372 (1986); see United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530, 1540 (11th Cir.) ("The notion of 'enterprise conspiracy' ... has made much of the old distinction between 'single conspiracy' and 'multiple conspiracy' irrelevant to RICO conspiracy charges."), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 96 , 1…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Gonzalez, Roberto Gonzalez, Jorge Luis Fonte, Manual Rodriguez A/K/A Manny
See United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530, 1540 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 178 , 116 L.Ed.2d 140 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hannelore Baumer v. James P. Pachl and Gordon L. Yow
See United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530, 1539 (11th Cir.) (“[a] RICO conspiracy requires proof of an agreement to violate a substantive RICO provision.”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 178 , 116 L.Ed.2d 140 (1991); United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322 , 1341 n. 64 (5th Cir.1983), (agreement is “vital” to RICO conspiracy claim), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984); United States v. Bright, 630 F.2d 804, 834 (5th Cir.1980) (there “must be proof that the individual, by his words or actions, objectively manifested an agreement to participate…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Walter Starrett, Timothy Kevin Duke, Michael Lee Cave, Donald Joe Sears, James Thomas Nolan, Frederick Joseph Hegney, United States of America v. Donald Joe Sears, James Thomas Nolan
Sec. 1962 (d), the government must prove that the defendants "objectively manifested, through words or actions, an agreement to participate in the conduct of the affairs of the enterprise through the commission of two or more predicate crimes." Russo, 796 F.2d at 1455 (citation and quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530, 1540 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 860 , 112 S.Ct. 178 , 116 L.Ed.2d 140 (1991); United States v. Elliott, 571 F.2d 880, 902 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 953 , 99 S.Ct. 349 , 58 L.Ed.2d 344 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Starrett
The RICO Conspiracy Count To establish a RICO conspiracy violation under 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (d), the government must prove that the defendants “objectively manifested, through words or actions, an agreement to participate in the conduct of the affairs of the enterprise through the commission of two or more predicate crimes.” Russo, 796 F.2d at 1455 (citation and quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530, 1540 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 860 , 112 S.Ct. 178 , 116 L.Ed.2d 140 (1991); United States v. Elliott, 571 F.2d 880, 902 (5th Cir.), cert. denied…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ricou Deshaw
See e.g., United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 178 , 116 L.Ed.2d 140 , --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 68 (1991); United States v. Esposito, 912 F.2d 60 (3d Cir.1990), cert. dismissed, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 806 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1991); United States v. Ryland, 806 F.2d 941 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1057 , 107 S.Ct. 2199 , 95 L.Ed.2d 854 (1987) 21 471 U.S. 773 , 105 S.Ct. 2407 , 85 L.Ed.2d 764 (1985) (it is not a violation of the double jeopardy clause to prosecute a CCE offense after a prior conviction for one …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. v. Deshaw
See e.g., United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 178 , 116 L.Ed.2d 140 , — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 68 (1991); United States v. Esposito, 912 F.2d 60 (3d Cir.1990), ce rt. dismissed, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 806 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1991); United States v. Ryland, 806 F.2d 941 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1057 , 107 S.Ct. 2199 , 95 L.Ed.2d 854 (1987). 21 . 471 U.S. 773 , 105 S.Ct. 2407 , 85 L.Ed.2d 764 (1985) (it is not a violation of the double jeopardy clause to prosecute a CCE offense after a prior conviction for one of th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Prusan
Scarfo v. United States, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991) (declining to adopt Grady test in RICO context and limiting its application to “offenses arising from a single discrete event”) with United States v. Russo, 906 F.2d 77 (2d Cir.1990) (finding prosecution of a predicate act following acquittal on RICO conspiracy charge barred under Grady test); see also United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530, 1537-39 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 178 , 116 L.Ed.2d 140 (1991); Felix, 926 F.2d at 1527 , 1527 nn. 4-5.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Standefer
Compare United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530, 1536-39 (11th Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 178 , 116 L.Ed.2d 140 (1991), and United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084 (3d Cir. 1990), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991); with United States v. Felix, 926 F.2d 1522 (10th Cir.1991), pet’n for cert, granted, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 47 , 116 L.Ed.2d 25 (1991), and United States v. Calderone, 917 F.2d 717 (2d Cir.1990), pet’n for cert, filed, No. 90-1527.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Danny Leon Standefer, United States of America v. Anthony Eugene Glasco, United States of America v. Michael Gene Edwards, United States of America v. Ralph Eugene Ivy Kenneth Ray Kirk
Compare United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530, 1536-39 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 178 , 116 L.Ed.2d 140 (1991), and United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991); with United States v. Felix, 926 F.2d 1522 (10th Cir.1991), pet'n for cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 47 , 116 L.Ed.2d 25 (1991), and United States v. Calderone, 917 F.2d 717 (2d Cir.1990), pet'n for cert. filed, No. 90-1527. 13 We decline to address these issues because they were not raised in the district court and…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charles E. JONES, etc.
v.
Anola Marie ATCHISON
v.
Anola Marie ATCHISON
No. 91-82.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
112 S. Ct. 178
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Denied.