green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Society Hill Towers Owners' Assn. v. Rendell
See Lockhart v. Kenops, 927 F.2d 1028, 1032 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 863 , 112 S.Ct. 186 , 116 L.Ed.2d 148 (1991), and Sabine River Authority v. U.S. Dept. of Interior, 951 F.2d 669 , 677-78 (5th Cir.1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Daniel Von Eye v. United States of America United States Department of Agriculture, Daniel R. Glickman, Secretary
See Lockhart v. Kenops, 927 F.2d 1028, 1032 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 863 , 112 S.Ct. 186 , 116 L.Ed.2d 148 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walters v. Fruth Pharmacy, Inc.
See Cavender v. Fouty, 195 W.Va. 94 , 464 S.E.2d 736 (1995) (per curiam) and Miller v. Monongahela Power Co., 184 W.Va. 663 , 403 S.E.2d 406 , cert. denied, 502 U.S. 863 , 112 S.Ct. 186 , 116 L.Ed.2d 147 (1991) for a discussion of the duty owed to invitees.
discussed
Cited "see"
Iron Rangers for Responsible Ridge Action v. Iron Range Resources
(2×)
See Lockhart v. Kenops, 927 F.2d 1028, 1033 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 863 , 112 S.Ct. 186 , 116 L.Ed.2d 148 (1991) (zoning regulations of sewer systems would prevent seepage).
cited
Cited "see"
Landmark West v. United States Postal Service
See Lockhart v. Kenops, 927 F.2d 1028, 1035-36 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 186 , 116 L.Ed.2d 148 (1991); Conservation Law Found. v. General Servs.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Delaney
(2×)
See People v. Chard, 808 P.2d 351 (Colo.1991), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 186 , 116 L.Ed.2d 147 (1991); State v. Farr, 558 So.2d 437 (Fla.App.1990); State v. Drab, 546 So.2d 54 (Fla.App.1989); People v. Beauchamp, 126 Misc.2d 754 , 483 N.Y.S.2d 946 (N.Y.Supp.1985); Lanton v. State, 456 So.2d 873 (Ala.Crim.App. 1984), cert. denied 471 U.S. 1095 , 105 S.Ct. 2314 , 85 L.Ed.2d 834 (1985); People v. Glover, 49 Ill.2d 78 , 273 N.E.2d 367 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Christina Thompson, Debtor. Sanford A. Kowal v. Charles M. Malkemus
See In re Latimer, 918 F.2d 136 , 137 (10th Cir.1990) (debtor lacks standing to participate in adversary proceeding, absent intervention), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 186 , 116 L.Ed.2d 147 (1991). 7 Permission to intervene as of right endows the intervenor with appellate standing to challenge an adverse judgment entered in the adversary proceeding.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sabine River Authority v. U.S. Department Of Interior
See Lockhart v. Kenops, 927 F.2d 1028, 1032 (8th Cir.) (holding that the intervening decision of Oregon Natural undercut Eight Circuit precedent applying the reasonableness standard with respect review of an agency's decision to forego preparation of an original EIS), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 186 , 116 L.Ed.2d 148 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sabine River Authority v. U.S. Department of Interior
See Lockhart v. Kenops, 927 F.2d 1028, 1032 (8th Cir.) (holding that the intervening decision of Oregon Natural undercut Eight Circuit precedent applying the reasonableness standard with respect review of an agency’s decision to forego preparation of an original EIS), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 186 , 116 L.Ed.2d 148 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blackwell v. Zollino (In Re Blackwell for the Estate of I.G. Services Ltd.)
P. 5011; see also In re Latimer, 918 F.2d 136 , 137 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 863 , 112 S.Ct. 186 , 116 L.Ed.2d 147 (1991); Consolidated Industries Corp. v. Welbilt Holding Co., 254 B.R. 237, 241 (N.D.Ind.2000); In re Commercial Financial Services, Inc., 252 B.R. 516, 520 (Bankr.N.D.Okla.2000); In re West Coast Video Enterprises, Inc., 145 B.R. 484, 489 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Kaiser Steel Corporation
"An entity asserting a protectable interest in an adversary proceeding, yet not a 'party in interest' to the larger bankruptcy case, must first seek intervention in the bankruptcy case under Bankruptcy Rule 2018." In re Thompson, 965 F.2d 1136 at 1141 n. 7; see also In re Charter Co., 50 B.R. 57, 61 (Bankr.W.D.Tx.1985); Fed.R.Bankr.P. 7024 Advisory Committee Note. "[N]onparty participation in an adversary proceeding is dependent on intervention." In re Thompson, 965 F.2d 1136 at 1140 (1st Cir.1992); see also In re Latimer, 918 F.2d 136 , 137 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vermejo Park Corp. v. Kaiser Coal Corp. (In re Kaiser Steel Corp.)
R.Bankr.P. 7024 Advisory Committee Note. “[N]onparty participation in an adversary proceeding is dependent on intervention.” In re Thompson, 965 F.2d 1136 at 1140 (1st Cir.1992); see also In re Latimer, 918 F.2d 136 , 137 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 186 , 116 L.Ed.2d 147 (1991). “[I]ntervention in an adversary proceeding is governed by Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, made applicable to adversary proceedings by virtue of Rule 7024 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.” In re St.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Audubon Society of Central Arkansas v. Dailey
See also Lockhart v. Kenops, 927 F.2d 1028, 1032 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 U.S. 761 , 112 S.Ct. 186 , 116 L.Ed.2d 148 (1991). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Audubon Society Of Central Arkansas v. Dailey
See also Lockhart v. Kenops, 927 F.2d 1028, 1032 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 U.S. 761 , 112 S.Ct. 186 , 116 L.Ed.2d 148 (1991) 8 The Cabinet Mountains catalog of factors for deciding when a decision to forego an EIS is arbitrary and capricious corresponds roughly with the checklist for "arbitrary and capricious" review of agency rulemaking: Normally, an agency rule would be arbitrary and capricious if the agency has relied on factors which Congress has not intended it to consider, entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem, offered an explanation for its decision that run…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Diana M. Maulding v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary
We accord the district court’s decision “no particular deference.” First National Bank of Fayetteville v. Smith, 508 F.2d 1371, 1374 (8th Cir.1974), cert. den., 421 U.S. 930 , 95 S.Ct. 1655 , 44 L.Ed.2d 86 (1975); see also Lockhart v. Kenops, 927 F.2d 1028, 1032 (8th Cir.), cert. den., - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 186 , 116 L.Ed.2d 148 (1991); Brown v. United States Dept. of Interior, 679 F.2d 747, 749 (8th Cir.1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Emily L. LATIMER
v.
Kenneth L. STAINER, etc.
v.
Kenneth L. STAINER, etc.
No. 91-148.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
112 S. Ct. 186
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Denied.