green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mann
See United States v. Hart, 70 F.3d 854, 859 (“Generally, an indictment may not charge a single criminal offense in several counts without offending the rule against ‘multiplicity’ and implicating the double jeopardy clause.” quoting United States v. Busacca, 936 F.2d 232, 239 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 985 , 112 S.Ct. 595 , 116 L.Ed.2d 619 (1991)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel M. Paradies, the Paradies Shops, Inc., Paradies Midfield Corporation, Ira Jackson
See United States v. Busacca, 936 F.2d 232, 239 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 985 , 112 S.Ct. 595 , 116 L.Ed.2d 619 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paradies
See United States v. Busacca, 936 F.2d 232, 239 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 985 , 112 S.Ct. 595 , 116 L.Ed.2d 619 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tina Marie Virta, Victor Pennell, Oscar Virta, Jr., Timothy Galbraith, and Paul Mousseau
See United States v. Garcia, 936 F.2d 648, 652 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 595 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pagan
A ‘reasonable probability’ is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 682 , 105 S.Ct. 3375, 3383 , 87 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985); see United States v. Garcia, 936 F.2d 648, 655 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 595 , 116 L.Ed.2d 619 (1991); United States v. Underwood, 932 F.2d 1049, 1052 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 382 , 116 L.Ed.2d 333 (1991); United States v. Rivalta, 925 F.2d 596, 597 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 215 , 116 L.Ed.2d 173 (1991); United States v. Bejasa, 904 F.2d 137…
discussed
Cited "see"
Republic of Turkey v. OKS Partners
See United States v. Busacca, 936 F.2d 232 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 595 , 116 L.Ed.2d 619 (1991). *68 Defendants submit the recent Supreme Court case of Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corp., — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 1311 , 117 L.Ed.2d 532 (1992), for the proposition that a civil RICO plaintiff must make a showing that the defendant’s violation must have proximately caused the plaintiff’s injuries.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. State
Compare United States v. Busacca, 936 F.2d 232 (6th Cir.) (holding that predicate acts of misappropriating six checks in 2 1/2 months from health and pension funds over which the defendant had control was sufficient to establish continuity where Busacca had the *881 ability to control disbursement of monies from those funds), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 985 , 112 S.Ct. 595 , 116 L.Ed.2d 619 (1991); State v. Lucas, 600 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 1992) (holding that evidence of a series of related fraudulent activities which occurred over a six-month period can demonstrate "closed-ended continuity").
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Enrique Reinaldo Rivera and Samuel Aponte-Vega
See, e.g., United States v. Garcia, 936 F.2d 648, 656 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 595 , 116 L.Ed.2d 619 (1991); United States v. Bermingham, 855 F.2d 925, 934-35 (2d Cir.1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Benton
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 91-5740.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 2, 1991.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.