green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1992 ·
…the core of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Herman B. Slater, United States of America v. Harold L. Porter
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
the core of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jacobson
See State v. McKown, 461 N.W.2d 720, 725 (Minn.App.1990) (concluding that state had previously approved certain conduct and then unconstitutionally prosecuted defendants for the same conduct), aff'd, 475 N.W.2d 63 (Minn.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1036 , 112 S.Ct. 882 , 116 L.Ed.2d 786 (1992); United States v. Tallmadge, 829 F.2d 767, 774 (9th Cir.1987) (stating that in asserting reliance on an official interpretation of law “the defendant must show that he relied on the false information and that his reliance was reasonable.”); Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 559, 571 , 85 S.Ct. 476, 484 , 1…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Samonte
See United States v. Vario, 943 F.2d 236, 241 (2nd Cir. 1991) (“Although the district court here did not instruct the jury in order to explain their anonymity, there is no reason to believe that the absence of instructions led the jurors to conclude other than that it is a common practice to keep jurors’ names and identities in confidence”) (citation, quotation marks and brackets omitted), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1036 , 112 S.Ct. 882 , 116 L.Ed.2d 786 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Darrell I. Lewis
See United States v. Esparsen, 930 F.2d 1461, 1470 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 882 (1992). 17 The jury heard overwhelming testimony and saw evidence relating to the narcotics that were found in the vehicle, the videotape of the stop, the seized narcotics, the scales, and the communication devices.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roderick K. Dirden
See United States v. Esparsen, 930 F.2d 1461, 1470 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 882 , 116 L.Ed.2d 786 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Allan Ross
(2×)
See United States v. Vario, 943 F.2d 236, 241 (2d Cir.1991) (holding that mere invocation of names of organized crime groups is insufficient basis to order anonymous jury), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 882 , 116 L.Ed.2d 786 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Speer
See United States v. Esparsen, 930 F.2d 1461, 1470 (10th Cir.1991), citing United States v. Taylor, 612 F.2d 1272, 1275 (10th Cir.) (participation of relatively slight moment sufficient to constitute aiding and abetting), ce rt. denied in Esparsen, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 882 , 116 L.Ed.2d 786 (1992), and in Taylor, 444 U.S. 1092 , 100 S.Ct. 1060 , 62 L.Ed.2d 782 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vittorio Amuso, Also Known as Jesse, Also Known as Vic
(2×)
See United States v. Vario, 943 F.2d 236, 240-41 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 882 , 116 L.Ed.2d 786 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. McCuiston
See generally State v. McKown, 475 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Minn.1991) (statutes which are in pari materia should be construed together), cert. denied — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 882 , 116 L.Ed.2d 786 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Wellman v. MCI Telecommunications Corporation
See Bright v. Houston Northwest Medical Ctr., 934 F.2d 671 (5th Cir.1991) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 882 (1992) (employee called in to work an average of four to five times a week, including weekends, did not state a claim for overtime compensation under FLSA); Armitage, 982 F.2d at 431 (plaintiffs received call-ins less than two times per week on average). 12 We have concluded that the district court correctly appraised the allegations of Wellman's claim, and accepting them as true, we find no basis for FLSA damages. 13 AFFIRMED. * This disposition is not appropriate fo…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jefferson v. United States
(2×)
We agree with the Maryland Court of Special Appeals that such limited facts — the number of black persons challenged versus the number of white persons challenged — can be relevant only when the court also has “knowledge of the percentage of strikes used against a given group [and] also knowledge of the percentage that that group represented of the total venire panel — or, more precisely, of the percentage that that group represented of the prospective jurors actually called forward to be accepted or challenged.” Bailey v. State, supra note 5 , 84 Md.App. at 331, 579 A.2d at 778; see…
discussed
Cited "see"
Raymond Joseph Echlin, Ronald Bishop (92-2009) Donald Johnson (92-2539) v. Robert Lecureux
(2×)
See United States v. Esparsen, 930 F.2d 1461 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 882 , 116 L.Ed.2d 786 (1992); United States v. Ruiz, 894 F.2d 501 (2d Cir.1990); United States v. Moreno, 878 F.2d 817 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 979 , 110 S.Ct. 508 , 107 L.Ed.2d 510 (1989); United States v. Chinchilla, 874 F.2d 695 (9th Cir.1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Efrain De La Cruz, United States v. Luis Torres
See United States v. Esparsen, 930 F.2d 1461, 1469-70 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 882 , 116 L.Ed.2d 786 (1991) (collecting cases).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Angiulo
(2×)
See United States v. Vario, 943 F.2d 236, 239 (2d Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 882 (1992); United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1132 (2d Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 (1990); United States v. Scarfo, 850 F.2d 1015, 1023-1025 (3d Cir. 1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Easter, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Esparsen, 930 F.2d 1461 , 1476 n. 18 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 882 , 116 L.Ed.2d 786 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ford
See also United States v. Vario, 943 F.2d 236, 240 (2d Cir.1991) (where the defendant was already charged with obstruction of justice, and there was extensive pre-trial publicity), ce rt. denied, 502 U.S. 1036 , 112 S.Ct. 882 , 116 L.Ed.2d 786 (1992); United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1362, 1364 (2d Cir.) (where the defendants were members of an organized criminal group and were charged with murdering government witnesses), cer t. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985), and United States v. Scarfo, 850 F.2d 1015, 1023 (3d Cir.) (where the jury would hear testimony tha…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bowles
See also United States v. Vario, 943 F.2d 236, 240 (2d Cir.1991) (where the defendant was already charged with obstruction of justice, and there was extensive pre-trial publicity), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1036 , 112 S.Ct. 882 , 116 L.Ed.2d 786 (1992); United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1362, 1364 (2d Cir.) (where the defendants were members of an organized criminal group and were charged with murdering gov-. ernment witnesses), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985), and cert. denied, 479 U.S. 818 , 107 S.Ct. 78 , 93 L.Ed.2d 34 (1986); United States v. Scarfo, 850…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Duran
See also United States v. Esparsen, 930 F.2d 1461, 1469 (10th Cir.1991) (“When the refusal to answer cross-examination questions involves collateral matters ... the testimony should not be struck.”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1036 , 112 S.Ct. 882 , 116 L.Ed.2d 786 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alex Wong, Roger Kwok, Chen I. Chung, Tung Tran, Danny Ngo, Brian Chan, Joseph Wang, Chiang T. Cheng, and Steven Ng
These competing individual and institutional interests are reasonably accommodated, and the use of an anonymous jury is constitutional, when there is “strong reason to believe the jury needs protection” and the district court “tak[es] reasonable precautions to minimize any prejudicial effects on the defendant and to ensure that his fundamental rights are protected.” United States v. Paccione, 949 F.2d 1183, 1192 (2d Cir.1991) (collecting cases), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3029 , 120 L.Ed.2d 900 (1992); see also United States v. Vario, 943 F.2d 236, 239 (2d Cir.1991), cert. den…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jorge Negrete-Gonzales, United States of America v. Rogelio Mendoza-Barajas
Id.; see also United States v. Esparsen, 930 F.2d 1461, 1469 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 882 , 116 L.Ed.2d 786 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Minnesota
v.
McKown et vir.
v.
McKown et vir.
No. 91-862.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1992.
Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (2)
Sup. Ct. Minn. Certiorari denied.