examined Cited "but see" United States v. James Brown (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g." Wilson v. State, 317 Ark. 548 , 878 S.W.2d 755, 758 (rejecting claim that Sec. 3109 is required by the Fourth Amendment), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 571 , 130 L.Ed.2d 488 (1994); see Ayeni v. Mottola, 35 F.3d 680 , 687 n. 9 (2d Cir.1994) (Section 3109 coincides with the requirements of the Fourth Amendment); Rivera v. United States, 928 F.2d 592, 606 (2d Cir.1991) (Fourth Amendment requires officers to provide notice of identity and imminent entry); but see United States v. Sagaribay, 982 F.2d 906, 909-10 (5th Cir.) (Fourth Amendment does not incorporate Sec. 3109), cert. denied, …

discussed Cited "but see" State v. Attaway (2×) But see United States v. Sagaribay, 982 F.2d 906, 910 (5th Cir.) (knock-and-announce rule only a factor in determining reasonableness but not an inflexible part of the Fourth Amendment), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 160 , 126 L.Ed.2d 120 (1993); United States v. Nolan, 718 F.2d 589, 600-02 (3d Cir.1983) (holding that the Fourth Amendment and the federal knock-and-announce statute overlap, but do not coincide).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Conley See United States v. Sagaribay, 982 F.2d 906, 910 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 160 , 126 L.Ed.2d 120 (1993); Nolan, 718 F.2d at 602 ; cf. Stiver, 9 F.3d at 302 . (iii) Conclusions of Law 91.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Sokolow Although the Inservco business records were derived in part from information provided by outside persons not under a business compulsion, the business records exception may still apply "[i]f the business entity has adequate verification or other assurance of accuracy of the information provided by the outside person." See United States v. McIntyre, 997 F.2d 687, 700 (10th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 736 (1994); see also United States v. Console, 13 F.3d 641, 657-58 (3d Cir. 1993) (under Rule 803(6), person transmitting recorded information not required to be under business duty to pro…