green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.3 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Admiral Insurance Co.
it is the insured's initial discharge, however, not the resulting damage or pollution, that is the focus of the inquiry under the pollution exclusion clauses.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sweeney
See Sweeney v. Resolution Trust Corp., 16 F.3d 1, 2-3 (1st Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 914 , 115 S.Ct. 291 , 130 L.Ed.2d 206 (1994) (holding that removal to federal district court was proper and affirming the district court judgment against Sweeneys).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaiser v. Stewart
See Manson v. Stacescu, 11 F.3d 1127, 1130-33 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 915 , 115 S.Ct. 292 , 130 L.Ed.2d 206 (1994); Mid-State Fertilizer Co. v. Exchange Nat’l Bank, 877 F.2d 1333, 1336-37 (7th Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
LaFarge Corp. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
See In re Texas Transmission Corporation PCB Contamination Insurance Coverage Litigation, 870 F.Supp. 1293 (E.D.Pa.1992), affirmed, 995 F.2d 219 (3rd Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 291 , 130 L.Ed.2d 206 (1994); American States Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Hirsch v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
See Manson v. Stacescu, 11 F.3d 1127, 1133 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 292 , 130 L.Ed.2d 206 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Hirsch v. Arthur Andersen & Company
See Manson v. Stacescu, 11 F.3d 1127, 1133 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 292 , 130 L.Ed.2d 206 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ferreira v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See Sweeney v. Resolution Trust Corporation, 16 F.3d 1, 6 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 291 , 130 L.Ed.2d 206 (1994) (denying request to prevent RTC 5 from foreclosing on property secured by note owned by failed institution); Telematics International, Inc. v. NEMLC Leasing Corporation, 967 F.2d at 706 (section 1821(j) prevents district court from enjoining FDIC from foreclosing on property secured by certificate of deposit issued to failed bank); Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corporation, 938 F.2d 383, 397-398 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981 , 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 60…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
May v. Coffey
See Fink v. Golenbock, 238 Conn. 183, 206-207 , 680 A.2d 1243 (1996), citing Larson v. Dumke, 900 F.2d 1363, 1367 (9th Cir. 1990) (concluding single minority shareholder to be adequate representative in derivative suit against all other shareholders who had benefited from wrong claimed in suit); see also Manson v. Stacescu, 11 F.3d 1127, 1131-32 (2d Cir. 1993) (even though shareholder allegedly had participated in wrongdoing, she sustained same injury with respect to value of her shares as plaintiff and both would be made whole by derivative action), cert. denied, 513 U.S 915, 115 S. Ct. 292 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bank of America Corp. v. Lemgruber
Laborers Local 17 Health and Benefit Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc., 191 F.3d 229, 236, 242 (2d Cir.1999) (holding that derivatively-injured plaintiffs lacked standing to sue for fraud under New York law), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1080 , 120 S.Ct. 799 , 145 L.Ed.2d 673 (2000); see also Manson v. Stacescu, 11 F.3d 1127, 1130-31 (2d Cir.1993) (holding that plaintiff “does not have standing in his capacity as a creditor, shareholder, or employee of a corporation to assert a RICO claim for injuries that are derivative of those sustained by that corporation”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 915 , 115 S.Ct. …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bingham v. Zolt
See, e.g., Manson v. Stacescu, 11 F.3d 1127, 1131 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 292 , 130 L.Ed.2d 206 (1994); Green v. Victor Talking Mach.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bingham v. Zolt
See, e.g., Manson v. Stacescu, 11 F.3d 1127, 1131 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 292 , 130 L.Ed.2d 206 (1994); Green v. Victor Talking Mach.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pappas v. Passias
See Bass v. Campagnone, 838 F.2d 10, 12 (1st Cir. 1988) (Plaintiff union members lacked standing to sue under RICO “because they alleged] an injury sustained by all of the members of the local collectively, rather than themselves individually;” since the local had not sued in its own right, the complaint of the union members in Bass was dismissed.); see also Manson v. Stacescu, 11 F.3d 1127, 1130-31 (2d Cir.1993) (Certain creditors of debtor corporation lacked standing to bring RICO claims alleging that the defendants had looted the corporation to the point of bankruptcy, because the injur…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
David MANSON
v.
Anca STACESCU
v.
Anca STACESCU
No. 93-2092.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
Cited by 52 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Superior Court of Delaware (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Justice BREYER took no part in the con- sideration or decision of this petition.