green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Swartz v. KPMG, LLC
See Howard v. America Online Inc., 208 F.3d 741, 749-50 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 828 , 121 S.Ct. 77 , 148 L.Ed.2d 40 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Qwest Communications Corp. v. City of Berkeley
See Howard v. America Online, Inc., 208 F.3d 741, 751-53 (9th Cir.2000), cert, denied 531 U.S. 828 , 121 S.Ct. 77 , 148 L.Ed.2d 40 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bollin
Id. at 670; accord United States v. Dicter, 198 F.3d 1284, 1290 (11th Cir. 1999) (holding that 21 U.S.C. § 853 (a) applies "irrespective of any provision of state law"), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 77 (2000); 39 United States v. 18755 North Bay Road, 13 F.3d 1493 , 1498 (11th Cir. 1994) (holding that federal forfeiture law preempts the Florida homestead exemption); United States v. Curtis, 965 F.2d 610, 616 (8th Cir. 1992) (holding that § 853(a) supersedes the Iowa homestead exemption); see also United States v. Rodgers, 461 U.S. 677 (1983) (holding that federal tax collection laws supersede s…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary D. Bollin, United States of America v. Ernst N. Tietjen, United States of America v. James Gormley
Id. at 670 ; accord United States v. Dieter, 198 F.3d 1284 , 1290 (11th Cir.1999) (holding that 21 U.S.C. § 853 (a) applies “irrespective of any provision of state law”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 828 , 121 S.Ct. 77 , 148 L.Ed.2d 40 (2000); United States v. 18755 North Bay Road, 13 F.3d 1493 , 1498 (11th Cir.1994) (holding that federal forfeiture law preempts the Florida homestead exemption); United States v. Curtis, 965 F.2d 610, 616 (8th Cir.1992) (holding that § 853(a) supersedes the Iowa homestead exemption); see also United States v. Rodgers, 461 U.S. 677 , 103 S.Ct. 2132 , 76 L.Ed.2d …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bollin
Id. at 670; accord United States v. Dicter, 198 F.3d 1284, 1290 (11th Cir. 1999) (holding that 21 U.S.C. § 853 (a) applies "irrespective of any provision of state law"), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 77 (2000); 40 UNITED STATES v. BOLLIN United States v. 18755 North Bay Road, 13 F.3d 1493 , 1498 (11th Cir. 1994) (holding that federal forfeiture law preempts the Florida homestead exemption); United States v. Curtis, 965 F.2d 610, 616 (8th Cir. 1992) (holding that § 853(a) supersedes the Iowa homestead exemption); see also United States v. Rodgers, 461 U.S. 677 (1983) (holding that federal tax coll…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Javitch v. First Montauk Financial Corp.
See also, Howard v. America Online, Inc., 208 F.3d 741 (9th Cm.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 828 , 121 S.Ct. 77 , 148 L.Ed.2d 40 (2000) (precluding RICO action where claims implicate conduct which could have been actionable securities fraud despite claimants’ lack of standing to assert those claims); Jordan (Bermuda) Inv.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Loan Investors, L. P.
v.
Town of Orange
v.
Town of Orange
No. 99-2091.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.