discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Timothy Fredrickson (2×) No. 115-391, § 404 (b), 132 Stat. 5194 , 5222 (2018). 124 S. Ct. at 2396.

discussed Cited "see" McKenzie v. State (2×) See State v. Knight, 866 So.2d 1195, 1204 (Fla.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1066 , 124 S.Ct. 2396 , 158 L.Ed.2d 969 (2004).

cited Cited "see" Timothy Knutson v. Ag Processing See Fuller v. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 576 N.W.2d 324, 329 (Iowa 1998). -5- v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 297 F.3d 720 , 724 n.3 (8th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 124 S. Ct. 2396 (2004).

discussed Cited "see" Timothy J. Knutson, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. Ag Processing, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee Ag Processing has not contested, however, that “working” is a “major life activity” *1051 under the ADA, so we continue to assume the point without deciding this “difficult question.” Williams, 534 U.S. at 200 , 122 S.Ct. 681 ; see Orr v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 297 F.3d 720 , 724 n. 3 (8th Cir.2002), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2396 , 158 L.Ed.2d 976 (2004).