Vigneau v. United States, 546 U.S. 1010 (2005). · Go Syfert
Vigneau v. United States, 546 U.S. 1010 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
81 citation events (81 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. DeLamos (ca4, 2007-10-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. DeLamos
4th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352-53 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1010 , 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jones
W.D. Va. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352-53 (4th Cir.) (“Even were we to agree with the [the defendant’s] prognostication that it is only a matter of time before the Supreme Court overrules Almendarez-Torres , we are not free to overrule or ignore the Supreme Court’s precedents.”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Waddell
4th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352-54 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005)(prior convictions need not be charged in the indictment, admitted by the defendant or proved to a jury).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Byrd
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352-53 (4th Cir.) (stating that the rule of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), was not overruled by Booker and remains the law), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Lanares-Mendez
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352-53 (4th Cir.) (holding that United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), reaffirmed exception set out in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), for sentence enhancements based on recidivism), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Briscoe
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ferreira
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352-53 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Johnson
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352-53 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Plata-Oceguera
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352-53 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
cited Cited "see" United States v. McDonald
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Jones
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 354 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ancrum
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 350 (4th Cir.) (holding that Sixth Amendment not violated when sentence enhanced based on prior convictions that were not charged in indictment or admitted by defendant), cer t. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Johnson
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352-54 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Grandos-Arredondo
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 350 (4th Cir.) (holding that Sixth Amendment not violated when sentence enhanced based on prior convictions that were not charged in indictment or admitted by defendant), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Brian A. Moreland, United States of America v. Brian A. Moreland
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352-53 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005). 2 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Moreland
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352-53 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 640 (2005).
cited Cited "see" United States v. McDougald
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349 (4th Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005); United States v. Sterling, 283 F.3d 216, 220 (4th Cir. 2002).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Mosley
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352-53 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Keen
4th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 350-51 (4th Cir.) (holding that armed career criminal enhancement falls within exception for prior convictions where facts were undisputed), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Dunlap
4th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 351-54 (4th Cir.2005) (holding that armed career criminal designation based on defendant’s prior convictions did not violate Sixth Amendment), petition for cert. filed, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 640 , — L.Ed.2d - (2005) (No. 05-6904); United States v. Guevara, 408 F.3d 252, 261 (5th Cir.2005) (“Career offender status is not ‘a sentencing judge’s determination of a fact other than a prior conviction.’ ...
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Kpa
4th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 233-36, 243-44 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998); see also United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 351-54 (4th Cir.) (reaffirming continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres after United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1010 , 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Waycaster
4th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 233-36, 243-44 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998); see also United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 351-54 (4th Cir.) (reaffirming continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres after United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1010 , 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Bolin
4th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 233-36, 243-44 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998); see also United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 351-54 (4th Cir.) (reaffirming continuing vahdity of Almendarez-Torres after United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1010 , 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005). *844 Accordingly, we affirm Bolin’s convictions and sentence.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Coleman
4th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Thompson, 421 F.3d 278 , 284 n. 4 (4th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1005 , 126 S.Ct. 1463 , 164 L.Ed.2d 250 (2006) (holding that the indictment need not reference or list the prior convictions underlying the enhancement); see also United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352-54 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1010 , 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005) (holding that prior convictions used as basis for armed career criminal sentence need not be charged in indictment or proven beyond a reasonable doubt).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Smith
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352-54 (4th Cir.) (holding that prior convictions used as basis for armed career criminal sentence need not be charged in indictment or proven beyond a reasonable doubt), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Scott
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352-54 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Escamilla-Vasquez
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Cornelio Pena, 435 F.3d 1279, 1288 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 2366 , 165 L.Ed.2d 289 (2006); United States v. Perez-Ramirez, 415 F.3d 876 , 877 n. 2 (8th Cir.2005); United States v. Camacho-Ibarquen, 410 F.3d 1307 , 1315-16 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 457 , 163 L.Ed.2d 347 (2005); United States v. Izaguirre-Flores, 405 F.3d 270 , 273 n. 9 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 253 , 163 L.Ed.2d 231 (2005); see also United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352-53 (4th Cir.) (stating that AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Moreno-Deleon
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Cornelio-Pena, 435 F.3d 1279, 1288 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 2366 , 165 L.Ed.2d 289 (2006); United States v. Thompson, 421 F.3d 278, 283-84 (4th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 1463 , 164 L.Ed.2d 250 (2006); see also United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352-53 (4th Cir.) (stating that Booker expressly incorporates exception for recidivism-based sentencing enhancements), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Hall
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 351-54 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005) (recognizing continuing validity of prior conviction exception).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Arias-Rodriguez
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Conelio-Pena, 435 F.3d 1279, 1288 (10th Cir.2006); United States v. Thompson, 421 F.3d 278, 283-84 (4th Cir.2005), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 1463 , 164 L.Ed.2d 250 (2006); see also United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 352-53 (4th Cir.) (stating that Booker expressly incorporates exception for recidivism-based sentence enhancements), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Harris
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Booker, 125 S.Ct. at 756 (“Any fact (other than a prior conviction) which is necessary to support a sentence ... must be proved to a jury.”); see also United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 351-54 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Burgess
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Thompson, 421 F.3d at 283 , 287 & n. 5; see also United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349 (4th Cir.2005) (holding that the armed career criminal designation based on prior convictions does not violate Booker), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Chaney
4th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Thompson, 421 F.3d at 283 , 287 & n. 5; see also United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349 (4th Cir.2005) (holding that the armed career criminal designation based on prior convictions does not violate Booker), cert. denied, —U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 640 , 163 L.Ed.2d 518 (2005); United States v. Collins, 412 F.3d 515, 521-23 (4th Cir.2005) (holding that, when the facts are undisputed, the application of the career offender enhancement falls within the exception for prior convictions).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vigneau
v.
United States
No. 05-6891.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 7, 2005.
546 U.S. 1010
Published

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.