green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Roger Andrew Talk, A/K/A Roderick Talk, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See Wilcoxon v. United States, 231 F.2d 384, 387 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 943 , 76 S.Ct. 834 , 100 L.Ed. 1469 (1956); United States v. Odom, 736 F.2d 104, 114-15 (4th Cir.1984); United States v. Perez, 651 F.2d 268, 273 (5th Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
STX, Inc. v. Trik Stik, Inc.
See, Fannin v. Jones, 229 F.2d 368, 369-70 (6th Cir.), cert. denied 351 U.S. 938 , 76 S.Ct. 834 , 100 L.Ed. 1465 (1956).
cited
Cited "see"
Eastern Scientific Marketing, Inc. v. Tekna-Seal, Inc.
See Fannin v. Jones, 229 F.2d 368 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 938 , 76 S.Ct. 834 , 100 L.Ed. 1465 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jonathan Corp. v. Prime Computer, Inc.
See In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 727 F.2d 1352, 1356 (4th Cir.1984) (stating that "a communication must be made in confidence of the relationship and under circumstances from which it may reasonably be presumed that it will remain in confidence”) (quoting Wilcoxon v. United States, 231 F.2d 384, 386 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 943 , 76 S.Ct. 834 , 100 L.Ed. 1469 (1956)); see also United States v. (UNDER SEAL), 748 F.2d 871, 875 (4th Cir.1984) (intent to maintain confidentiality is inferable from the circumstances, including the absence of a specific request to maintain confidentiali…
cited
Cited "see"
ARTISAN DEVELOP., DIV. OF KAISER AETNA v. Mountain States Develop. Corp.
See Fannin v. Jones, 229 F.2d 368 (6th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 938 , 76 S.Ct. 834 , 100 L.Ed. 1465 ; Sheffield Corp. v. George F. Alger Co., 16 F.R.D. 27, 28 (S.D.Ohio 1954).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fred L. YOUNG and Eleanor L. Young, Husband and Wife, and Robert C. Donihue, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. John W. TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
Sec. 78-24-8(2) (1953); see Wilcoxon v. United States, 231 F.2d 384 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 943 , 76 S.Ct. 834 , 100 L.Ed. 1469 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard Gallose v. Long Island Railroad Company
Corp., 35 F.2d 717, 721 (2d Cir.1929), aff'd, 281 U.S. 642 , 50 S.Ct. 443 , 74 L.Ed. 1086 (1930) — that the employer “may not be held liable unless the particular act performed negligently was also in the scope of employment of the negligent employee.” Trost v. American Hawaiian Steamship Co., 324 F.2d 225, 227 (2d Cir.1963), ce rt. denied, 376 U.S. 963 , 84 S.Ct. 1125 , 11 L.Ed.2d 981 (1964); see also Robinson v. Northeastern Steamship Corp., 228 F.2d 679, 681 (2d Cir.) (if employee “was not acting within the scope of his employment” then “his negligence, if any, * * * could not b…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Carreon
Rules Evid., rule 604, where no objection was made to interpreter not being sworn; see also Wilcoxon v. United States (10th Cir. 1956) 231 F.2d 384, 386-387 , cert. den. (1956) 351 U.S. 943 [ 100 L.Ed. 1469 , 76 S.Ct. 834 ]; Beausoliel v. United States (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, ETC.
See also Wilcoxon v. United States, 231 F.2d 384, 386-387 (10th Cir.1956), cert. den., 351 U.S. 943 , 76 S.Ct. 834 , 100 L.Ed. 1469 (1956); People in Interest of K.P., 182 Colo. 409 , 514 P.2d 1131, 1134 (1973); 6 Wigmore, Evidence, § 1819(b), at 297-298 (3d ed. 1940); 98 C.J.S.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kendall
See also Wilcoxon v United States, 231 F2d 384 (CA10th Cir) (1956), certiorari denied, 351 US 943 , 100 L Ed 1469 , 76 S Ct 834 (1956).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fannin, Administratrix
v.
Jones, U. S. District Judge
v.
Jones, U. S. District Judge
No. 828.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 21, 1956.
Elmer I. Schwartz for petitioner. Howard F. Burns for respondent.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.