Sandsberry v. Int'l Ass'n of Machinists, 353 U.S. 918 (1957). · Go Syfert
Search
Sandsberry v. Int'l Ass'n of Machinists, 353 U.S. 918 (1957). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
76 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: WKAT, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (cadc, 1961-10-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" WKAT, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1961 · signal: see · confidence high
See, for example, the discussion in Federal Communications Comm’n v. WOKO, 329 U.S. 223, 229 , 67 S.Ct. 213 , 91 L.Ed. 204 (1946). . 111 U.S.App.D.C. -, 295 F.2d 131 . . 64 Stat. 1129 , 1130. . 72 Stat. 951 . . 5 U.S.C.A. § 1037 (c). . 99 U.S.App.D.C. 199, 203-204 , 239 F.2d 19 , 23-24 (1956), certiorari denied, 353 U.S. 918 , 77 S.Ct. 664 , 1 L.Ed.2d 665 (1957).
cited Cited "see" Matter Of Marathon Foundry & Machine Company
7th Cir. · 1957 · signal: see · confidence high
See 77 S.Ct. 669 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." McNamee v. Woodbury Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses
Conn. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Farmer & Co. v. Hooks, 239 F.2d 547 (10th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 911 , 77 S. Ct. 669 , 1 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." James Wood, Cross v. Allen Worachek, Cross
7th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Ginsburg v. Black, 237 F.2d 790 (7th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 911 , 77 S.Ct. 669 , 1 L.Ed.2d 665 (1957).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Fidelity Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Rko General, Inc., Intervenor
D.C. Cir. · 1975 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. FCC, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 13 , 189 F.2d 677 , cert. denied, 342 U.S. 830 , 72 S.Ct. 55 , 96 L.Ed. 628 (1951). 40 The court makes a rather extraordinary cite to McClatchy Broadcasting Co., 19 F.C.C. 343 , 380-81 (1954), aff'd McClatchy Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 195 , 239 F.2d 15 (1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 918 , 77 S.Ct. 662 , 1 L.Ed.2d 665 (1957) in which the Hearing Examiner relied on the so-called "autonomy" argument to reduce a diversification preference (although not to eliminate it).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sandsberry
v.
International Association of Machinists
No. 810.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 25, 1957.
353 U.S. 918
E. A. Simpson for Sandsberry et al., J. C. Gibson, R. S. Outlaw, C. G. Niebank, Jr., Donald R. Richberg, A. J. Folley and Preston Shirley for the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al., petitioners. Milton Kramer and Lester P. Schoene for respondents.
Published

Supreme Court of Texas. Certiorari denied.