Noe v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 359 U.S. 924 (1959). · Go Syfert
Noe v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 359 U.S. 924 (1959). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
45 citation events across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Betty Fuller Farmer (ca8, 1968-08-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Betty Fuller Farmer
8th Cir. · 1968 · confidence medium
O’Brien v. United States, 236 F.Supp. 792 (D.Me.1964) (Maine law), holding the Government vicariously Hable for the conduct of the soldier while traveling from one training camp to another or reporting for duty 4 contra: Chapin v. United States, 258 F.2d 495 (9th cir. 1958), cert, denied, 359 u.S. 924, 79 S.Ct. 607 , 3 L.Ed.2d 627 (1959) (California law); Leonard v. United States, 235 F.2d 330 (10th Cir. 1956) (Wyoming law), remanded to district court for settlement, 352 U.S. 996 , 77 S.Ct. 555 , 1 L.Ed.2d 540 (1957); Kimball v. United States, 262 F.Supp. 509 (D.N.J.1967) (New Jersey law); B…
discussed Cited "see" The King's Garden, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Noe v. FCC, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 221 , 260 F.2d 739 (1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 924 , 79 S.Ct. 607 , 3 L.Ed.2d 627 (1959).
cited Cited "see" Quincy College & Seminary Corp. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
N.D. Ill. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See State of New Jersey v. United States, 168 F.Supp. 324 (D.N.J.1958), aff’d per curiam, Bergen County v. United States, 359 U.S. 27 , 79 S.Ct. 607 , 3 L.Ed.2d 625 (1959).
cited Cited "see" City of Williamsport v. United States
M.D. Penn. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See State of New Jersey v. United States, 168 F.Supp. 324 (D.C.1958), affirmed 359 U.S. 27 , 79 S.Ct. 607 , 3 L.Ed.2d 625 (1959).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Noe, doing business as James A. Noe & Co.
v.
Federal Communications Commission
No. 643.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 2, 1959.
359 U.S. 924
Warren Woods for petitioner., Solicitor■ General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, John L. Fitzgerald and Richard A. Solomon■ for the Federal Communications Commission, and Paul'M. Segal and Robert A. Marmet for Loyola' University, respondents.
Published

United States Court of Appeals for. the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.