green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Sanjuana Ruiz Cox
(2×)
But see United States v. Boyette, 299 F.2d 92, 96 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 844 , 82 S.Ct. 875 , 7 L.Ed.2d 848 (1962). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Maguire v. Allstate Insurance Company
See Harris v. Standard Accident & Insurance Co., 191 F.Supp. 538, 540 (S.D.N.Y.), rev’d on other grounds, 297 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 843 , 82 S.Ct. 875 , 7 L.Ed.2d 847 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nathan Brockstein and Manuel Brockstein, Doing Business as Church Avenue Poultry v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
See Harris v. Standard Accident & Insurance Co., 191 F.Supp. 538, 540 (S.D.N.Y.), rev’d on other grounds, 297 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 843 , 82 S.Ct. 875 , 7 L.Ed.2d 847 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Simpson
(2×)
See United States v Boyette, 299 F2d 92 (CA 4th Cir) (1962), cert den, 369 US 844 , 7 L ed 2d 848, 82 S Ct 875 (1962) ; cf. United States v McDaniel, 154 F Supp 1 (DC DC) (1957), affirmed, 255 F2d 896 (CA DC Cir) (1958), cert den, 358 US 853 , 3 L ed 2d 87, 79 S Ct 82 (1958).
examined
Cited "see"
Stefano Sovich v. P. A. Esperdy, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service
(4×)
See Judge Friendly's opinion in Diminich v. Esperdy, 299 F.2d 244, 246-247 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 844 , 82 S.Ct. 875 , 7 L.Ed.2d 848 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Attilio Zupicich v. P. A. Esperdy, as District Director of the Immigration and Naturalizationservice for the District of New York
(2×)
See, e. g., Diminich v. Esperdy, 299 F.2d 244 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 844 , 82 S.Ct. 875 , 7 L.Ed.2d 848 (1962); Blazina v. Bouchard, 286 F.2d 507 (3d Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 950 , 81 S.Ct. 1904 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1242 (1961); United States ex rel.
Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen
v.
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co.
v.
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co.
No. 745.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 9, 1962.
Burke Williamson, Jack A. Williamson and Harry Wilmarth for petitioners., James P. Reedy for respondent.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.