green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Western District Council of Lumber Production and Industrial Workers v. Louisiana Pacific Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
It is true that we have stated that: “[wjhere the activities sought to be enjoined have already occurred, and the appellate courts cannot undo what has already been done, the action is moot.” Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Bergland, 576 F.2d 1377, 1379 (9th Cir.1978); see Sawyer v. Pioneer Mill Co., 300 F.2d 200, 202 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 814 , 83 S.Ct. 24 , 9 L.Ed.2d 55 (1962) (shareholder’s action seeking preliminary injunction prohibiting management from voting proxies at meeting to approve merger was moot because the meeting had occurred and the other party to t…
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Sea-Land Service, Inc., (Sea Operations)
See Judge Wisdom’s seafaring wisdom in Fall v. Esso Standard Oil Co., 297 F.2d 411, 414 , 1962 A.M.C. 951 (5th Cir.1961), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 814 , 83 S.Ct. 24 , 9 L.Ed.2d 55 (1962).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bing
See Fall v. Esso Standard Oil Company, 297 F.2d 411, 413 (5th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 814 , 83 S.Ct. 24 , 9 L.Ed.2d 55 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas W. Cullen, Jr. v. Bmw of North America, Inc.
(2×)
See Pierce Ford Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 299 F.2d 425 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 24 , 9 L.Ed.2d 66 (1962).
cited
Cited "see"
Fray Chevrolet Sales, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, and Donald E. Fray v. General Motors Corporation
See Pierce Ford Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 299 F.2d 425, 430 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 24 , 9 L.Ed.2d 66 (1962); but see Semke, supra, 384 F.2d at 198 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Dana I. Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corporation
Accord, Pierce Ford Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 299 F.2d 425, 429 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 24 , 9 L.Ed.2d 66 (1962); Martin v. Texaco, Inc., 304 F.Supp. 498, 502-504 (S.D.Miss. 1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bill Call Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
See e.g., Pierce Ford Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 299 F.2d 425, 429 (2nd Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 24 , 9 L.Ed.2d 66 (1962).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
E. L. Cheeney Company and Edmon Lewis Fregia v. Walter L. Gates, Jr.
See, e. g., Fall v. Esso Standard Oil Co., 5 Cir., 1961, 297 F.2d 411, n. 7 , cert. denied, 371 U.S. 814 , 83 S.Ct. 24 , 9 L.Ed.2d 55 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barbara A. Nesmith and Richard A. Nesmith v. H. D. Alford
(2×)
See, e. g., Fall v. Esso Standard Oil Co., 5 Cir., 1961, 297 F.2d 411 , 1902 AMC 951 , note 7, cert, denied, 371 TJ.S. 814, 83 S.Ct. 24 , 9 L.Ed.2d 55 ; Smoot v. State Farm Mut.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sawyer
v.
Pioneer Mill Co., Ltd.
v.
Pioneer Mill Co., Ltd.
No. 132.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1962.
Robert W. Kenny for petitioner., J. Russell Cades and Marion B. Plant for respondents.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.