Hamm v. City of Rock Hill, 377 U.S. 988 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Hamm v. City of Rock Hill, 377 U.S. 988 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. John Edward Jones, A/K/A Liddy Jones, A/K/A Malik Shariff, United States of America v. Robert Avon Jones, A/K/A Bobby (ca4, 1976-02-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. John Edward Jones, A/K/A Liddy Jones, A/K/A Malik Shariff, United States of America v. Robert Avon Jones, A/K/A Bobby
4th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carbo v. United States (9th Cir. 1963), 314 F.2d 718, 737 , cert. denied, 377 U.S. 953 , 84 S.Ct. 1626 , 12 L.Ed.2d 498 (1964), reh. denied, 377 U.S. 1010 , 84 S.Ct. 1902 , 1903, 12 L.Ed.2d 1058 (1964): “It is for the judge then, and not the jury, to determine the admissibility of the declarations.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hamm
v.
City of Rock Hill
No. 105.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 22, 1964.
377 U.S. 988
Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III, Matthew J. Perry, Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr., Donald James Sampson and Willie T. Smith, Jr. for petitioner., Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

Supreme Court of South Carolina. Certiorari granted.