Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Overstreet, 382 U.S. 937 (1965). · Go Syfert
Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Overstreet, 382 U.S. 937 (1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
50 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Towe v. Martinson (mtd, 1996-02-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Towe v. Martinson
D. Mont. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Suhl v. Bumb, 348 F.2d 869, 873 (9th Cir.1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 938 , 86 S.Ct. 388 , 15 L.Ed.2d 349 (1965).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Valencia
2d Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pardo-Bolland, 348 F.2d 316, 324 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 944 , 86 S.Ct. 388 , 15 L.Ed.2d 353 (1965). 5.
discussed Cited "see" Mina Wright v. James Yackley
9th Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Martens v. Winder, 341 F.2d 197, 199 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 937 , 86 S.Ct. 391 , 15 L.Ed.2d 349 (1965); Swanson Painting Co. v. Painters Local No. 200, 391 F.2d 523, 524 (9th Cir. 1968). 3 .
cited Cited "see" California Clippers, Inc. v. United States Soccer Football Ass'n
N.D. Cal. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Martens v. Winder, 341 F.2d 197, 199 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. den., 382 U.S. 937 , 86 S.Ct. 391 , 15 L.Ed.2d 349 (1965).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Kaminsky
S.D.N.Y. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally, United States v. Pardo-Bolland, 229 F.Supp. 473, 475 (S.D.N.Y.1964), aff’d, 348 F.2d 316 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 944 , 86 S.Ct. 388 , 15 L.Ed.2d 353 (1965).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Birrell
S.D.N.Y. · 1967 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Pardo-Bolland, 229 F.Supp. 473, 478 (S.D.N.Y.1964), aff’d 348 F.2d 316 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 944 , 86 S.Ct. 388 , 15 L.Ed.2d 353 (1965); Conti v. Morgenthau, 232 F.Supp. 1004 (S.D.N.Y. 1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
v.
Overstreet
No. 505.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 6, 1965.
382 U.S. 937
Donald L. Holloioell, Robert L. Carter and Maria L. Marcus for petitioners., Hugh P. Futrell, Jr., for respondent.
Published

Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari granted limited to Question 2 presented by the petition which reads as follows:

“2. Has petitioner National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, a New York corporation, been deprived of its property without due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment by being held liable in damages for acts performed without its knowledge and by persons beyond its control?”