green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2007 ·
…the law appears well established that a nunc pro tunc decree in 18 proceedings to which the internal revenue service is not a party is not binding on that service for tax purposes.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Carlson v. Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes & Pagos
(2×)
the law appears well established that a nunc pro tunc decree in 18 proceedings to which the internal revenue service is not a party is not binding on that service for tax purposes.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. De Castro
See United States v. Hooshmand, 931 F.2d 725, 737 (11th Cir.1991) (statutory interpretation is a question of law reviewed de novo). 5 . 358 F.2d 761, 763 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 823 , 87 S.Ct. 51 , 17 L.Ed.2d 60 (1966). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Maria J. De Castro, A.K.A. Fifi
See United States v. Hooshmand, 931 F.2d 725, 737 (11th Cir.1991) (statutory interpretation is a question of law reviewed de novo). 5 . 358 F.2d 761, 763 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 823 , 87 S.Ct. 51 , 17 L.Ed.2d 60 (1966). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
The Lavay Corporation Gerard M. Lavay v. Dominion Federal Savings & Loan Association, and William L. Walde David A. Neal James Winston Bray William J. Dorn, the Lavay Corporation Gerard M. Lavay v. Dominion Federal Savings & Loan Association, and William L. Walde David A. Neal James Winston Bray William J. Dorn, the Lavay Corporation Gerard M. Lavay v. William J. Dorn, and Dominion Federal Savings & Loan Association William L. Walde David A. Neal James Winston Bray
See Hurley v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 355 F.2d 517 (7 Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 821 , 87 S.Ct. 48 , 17 L.Ed.2d 59 (1966) (on remand, plaintiff could not raise claim of breach of warranty because issue of defectiveness of aircraft was conclusively litigated).
discussed
Cited "see"
LaVay Corp. v. Dominion Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
See Hurley v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 355 F.2d 517 (7 Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 821 , 87 S.Ct. 48 , 17 L.Ed.2d 59 (1966) (on remand, plaintiff could not raise claim of breach of warranty because issue of defectiveness of aircraft was conclusively litigated).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Andrew Tsanas
See Hoover v. United States, 358 F.2d 87 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 822 , 87 S.Ct. 50 , 17 L.Ed.2d 59 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sam Hoover v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
(2×)
See Hoover v. United States, 5 Cir. 1966, 358 F.2d 87 , cert. denied, October 1, 1966, 385 U.S. 822 , 87 S.Ct. 50 , 17 L.Ed.2d 59 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Legislature v. Deukmejian
(2×)
(Hays v. Wood (1979) 25 Cal.3d 772, 786, fn. 3 [ 160 Cal.Rptr. 102 , 603 P.2d 19 ]; Fair Political Practices Com. v. State Personnel Bd. (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 52, 56 [ 143 Cal.Rptr. 393 ], disapproved on another point in Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ]; see also, Weaver v. Jordan (1966) 64 Cal.2d 235, 241 [ 49 Cal.Rptr. 537 , 411 P.2d 289 ], cert. den., 385 U.S. 844 [ 17 L.Ed.2d 75 , 87 S.Ct. 49 ]; Mulkey v. Reitman (1966) 64 Cal.2d 529, 533 [ 50 Cal.Rptr. 881 , 413 P.2d 825 ], affd. sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Deutsch
See also Hoover v. United States, 358 F.2d 87 (5th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 822 , 87 S. Ct. 50 , 17 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hagan
v.
Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California
v.
Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California
No. 190.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1966.
Cited by 34 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Indiana Court of Appeals (2)
App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of L. A. Certiorari denied.