Perez v. California, 395 U.S. 208 (1969). · Go Syfert
Search
Perez v. California, 395 U.S. 208 (1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: George P. Bradley v. United States (cadc, 1969-11-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) George P. Bradley v. United States
D.C. Cir. · 1969 · confidence medium
Now that Perez has been disposed of, 395 U.S. 208 , 89 S'.Ct. 1767, 23 L.Ed.2d 212 (1969), see note 66, infra, we now finalize our views in this opinion. 9 .
cited Cited "see" Elizabeth Forsling Harris v. Gloria Steinem, Patricia Carbine and Ms. Magazine Corp.
2d Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See O’Connell v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad Co., 391 F.2d 156 , 163 (2d Cir. 1968), vacated as moot, 395 U.S. 210 , 89 S.Ct. 1767 , 23 L.Ed.2d 213 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Enrique Perez
v.
California
39.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 26, 1969.
395 U.S. 208
Peter G. Fetros, by appointment of the Court, 393 U. S. 812, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner., Edsel W. Haws, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General.
Douglas, Per Curiam.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The writ is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Mr. Justice Douglas dissents from the dismissal of the writ.