green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Ruiz v. Robinson
See Starns v. Malkerson, 326 F.Supp. 234, 241 (D.Minn.1970), aff'd, 401 U.S. 985 , 91 S.Ct. 1231 , 28 L.Ed.2d 527 (1971) (“[Minnesota] has a valid interest in providing tuition-free education to those who have demonstrated by a year’s residence a bona fide intention of remaining here and who, by reason of that education, will be prepared to make a greater contribution to the state’s economy and future.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Green v. Anderson
See Starns v. Malkerson, 401 U.S. 985 , 91 S.Ct. 1231 , 28 L.Ed.2d 527 (1971), summarily aff'g 326 F.Supp. 234 (Minn.1970) (three-judge court); Sturgis v. Washington, 414 U.S. 1057 , 94 S.Ct. 563 , 38 L.Ed.2d 464 (1973), summarily aff'g 368 F.Supp. 38 (W.D.Wash) (three-judge court).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bagley v. Vermont Dept. of Taxes
See id. at 260 n. 15, 94 S.Ct. at 1083 n. 15 (approving Starns v. Malkerson, 326 F.Supp. 234, 238 (D.Minn. 1970), aff'd, 401 U.S. 985 , 91 S.Ct. 1231 , 28 L.Ed.2d 527 (1971)); Sosna v. Iowa, 419 U.S. 393, 409 , 95 S.Ct. 553, 562 , 42 L.Ed.2d 532 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Vanlaarhoven v. Newman
See Starns v. Malkerson, 326 F.Supp. 234 (D.Minn.1970), aff’d, 401 U.S. 985 , 91 S.Ct. 1231 , 28 L.Ed.2d 527 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Service MacHine & Shipbuilding Corp. v. Edwards
Lesser scrutiny, because of the less severe restriction on the right to travel, was also used in the following cases and has not been disapproved by the Supreme Court; see Spatt v. New York, 361 F.Supp. 1048 (E.D.N.Y.1973), aff’d mem., 414 U.S. 1058 , 94 S.Ct. 563 , 38 L.Ed.2d 465 (1973) and Starns. v. Malkerson, 326 F.Supp. 234 (D.Minn.1970), aff’d mem., 401 U.S. 985 , 91 S.Ct. 1231 , 28 L.Ed.2d 527 (1971). 21 .
cited
Cited "see"
Burke v. Raschke
See, Starns v. Malkerson, 326 F.Supp. 234 (D.Minn.1970), aff’d without op., 401 U.S. 985 , 91 S.Ct. 1231 , 28 L.Ed.2d 527 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ashley v. Ashley
(2×)
See Starns v. Malkerson, D.C., 326 F.Supp. 234 , affirmed, 401 U.S. 985 , 91 S.Ct. 1231 , 28 L.Ed.2d 527 ; Sturgis v. Washington, D.C., 368 F.Supp. 38 , affirmed, 414 U.S. 1057 , 94 S.Ct. 563 , 38 L.Ed.2d 464 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Russell A. Kelm v. William S. Carlson
(2×)
See Starns v. Malkerson, 326 F.Supp. 234 (D.Minn.1970), aff’d mem., 401 U.S. 985 , 91 S.Ct. 1231 , 28 L.Ed.2d 527 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Advisory From the Governor
“We hold only that a permanent irrebuttable presumption * * * is violative of the Due Process Clause * * * .” (Emphasis added.) Id. at 453 , 93 S.Ct. at 2237 , 37 L.Ed.2d at 72 ; see also Starns v. Malkerson, 326 F.Supp. 234 (D.Minn.1970), summarily affirmed, 401 U.S. 985 , 91 S.Ct. 1231 , 28 L.Ed.2d 527 (1971) (upholding Minnesota’s residency requirement because the student could rebut the presumption, after having lived in the state for one year, by presenting some evidence of residency status).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eddleman v. Center Tp. of Marion County
Compare Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 , 89 S.Ct. 1322 with Vlandis v. Kline, 412 U.S. 441 , 452-53 & n. 9, 93 S.Ct. 2230 , 2236-37 & n. 9, 37 L.Ed.2d 63 (dicta suggesting that states may constitutionally place durational residency requirements on college students seeking eligibility for lowered in-state tuition rates) and Starns v. Malkerson, 326 F.Supp. 234 (D.C.Minn.1970), summarily aff’d, 401 U.S. 985 , 91 S.Ct. 1231 , 28 L.Ed.2d 527 (1971). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marriage of Katz v. Katz
(2×)
See, e.g., Starns v. Malkerson, 326 F.Supp. 234, 239 (D.Minn.1970) (citing Morey v. Doud, 354 U.S. 457 , 77 S.Ct. 1344 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1485 (1957)), aff'd, 401 U.S. 985 , 91 S.Ct. 1231 , 28 L.Ed.2d 527 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Winston v. City of New York
Compare Vlandis v. Kline, 412 U.S. 441 , 452-53 n. 9, 93 S.Ct. 2230, 2236 , 37 L.Ed.2d 63 (1973) (declining to overrule Starns v. Malkerson, 401 U.S. 985 , 91 S.Ct. 1231 , 28 L.Ed.2d 527 (1971), which upheld one year residency requirement as a condition to lower tuition at state institutions of higher education).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas v. Bailey
(2×)
See also Starns v. Malkerson, 326 F.Supp. 234 (D.Minn.1970), aff’d, 401 U.S. 985 , 91 S.Ct. 1231 , 28 L.Ed.2d 527 (1971) (upholding on rational basis grounds Minnesota’s one-year durational residency requirement for reduced tuition at the state university). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh
See, e. g., Starns v. Malkerson, 326 F.Supp. 234 (D.Minn. 1970), aff’d 401 U.S. 985 , 91 S.Ct. 1231 , 28 L.Ed.2d 527 (1971); Clarke v. Redeker, 259 F.Supp. 117 (S.D.Iowa 1966), cert. denied 396 U.S. 862 , 90 S.Ct. 135 , 24 L.Ed.2d 115 . *1131 Since the determination of a student’s domicile necessarily involves a factual determination of the student’s intent to remain in a given place for an indefinite period, difficult problems are presented for the university.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Starns
v.
Malkerson
v.
Malkerson
No. 1250.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 29, 1971.
Noted, Set, Should, White.
Cited by 46 opinions | Published
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. Minn.
Mr. Justice White is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and case set for oral argument.