green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.8 score
“a fair and impartial trial is guaranteed to every defendant, and fundamentally means a trial before an impartial judge and by an impartial jury.”
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jane Flaster Kuznitsky, Formerly Known as Jane Flaster Biggard v. United States
he corporate and individual liabilities under section 6672 are separate and distinct.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. McCombs-Ellison
despite its denomination as a 'penalty' assessment, the statutory liability imposed by section 6672 is essentially civil in nature
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Johnson v. Scully
a fair and impartial trial is guaranteed to every defendant, and fundamentally means a trial before an impartial judge and by an impartial jury.
cited
Cited "see"
Luce v. Luce
See Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1216 (7th Cir.), cert denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
William Bracy v. Richard B. Gramley, Roger Collins v. George C. Welborn
(2×)
See United States v. Guglielmini, 384 F.2d 602, 605 (2d Cir.1967) (“Few claims are more difficult to resolve than the claim that the trial judge, presiding over a jury trial, has thrown his weight in favor of one side to such an extent that it cannot be said that the trial has been a fair one.”), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 820 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Omotunde Filani
See United States v. Guglielmini 384 F.2d 602, 605 (2d Cir.1967) (“There are few pages of this defendant’s testimony ... which are free of some question by the court, and there are numerous instances where the court took over the cross-examination from the prosecutor for extended periods.”), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 820 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Mortenson v. United States
See Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1217-18 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. United States
See id. (noting that “responsibility under section 6672 en compasses all those connected closely enough with the business to prevent the default from occurring.”)- Indicia of a responsible person include possessing eheckwriting authority (and the converse authority to refuse to write checks), id., and holding a corporate office, see Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1214-15 (7th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970) (noting that holding corporate office does not per se impose a duty, but that an officer may have such a duty even if he is not the d…
cited
Cited "see"
Ronald P. Muck, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee v. Duane Kiskadden, Counter-Defendant
See Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1218 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970); Bowlen v. United States, 90-2 U.S.T.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Muck v. United States
See Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1218 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970); Bowlen v. United States, 90-2 U.S.T.C.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Looking Glass, Ltd.
See Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1218 (7th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rayson Sports, Inc.
See Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1218 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970); Bernardi v. United States, 74-1 U.S.T.C., ¶ 82,212 (N.D.Ill.1973), aff'd, 507 F.2d 682 (7th Cir.1974), ce rt. denied, 422 U.S. 1042 , 95 S.Ct. 2656 , 45 L.Ed.2d 693 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Beishline v. United States (In Re Beishline)
See, Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1216 (7th Cir.1970), ce rt. denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Watson
See, United States v. Clark, 425 F.2d 827 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. den. 400 *240 U.S. 820, 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 ; Commonwealth v. Cromartie, supra.” Id., 226 Pa.Super. at 498 , 313 A.2d at 329 .
cited
Cited "see"
Hanhauser v. United States
See Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1216 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 .
cited
Cited "see"
Harold E. Harrington v. United States
See Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970); Hewitt v. United States, 377 F.2d 921 (5th Cir. 1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roland J. Kalb v. United States of America, and Third-Party v.jerome L. Herold, Third-Party
See Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1216 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970). *510 In this case the government at no time indicated that the overpayment would be applied to the withholding tax liability.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Simon Gorden
See Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1215 (7th Cir. 1970), certiorari denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed. 2d 48 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert J. Braden v. United States v. John F. Bonistall, Third-Party
See Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1214 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970). *344 The next conflict in the testimony was over whether the Appellant knew of the deficiencies and intentionally failed to pay them.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis C. McCarty Jr. v. The United States
See Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210 (C.A.7, 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970); Newsome v. United States, 431 F.2d 742 (C.A.5, 1970); Spivak v. United States, 370 F.2d 612 (C.A.2), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 908 , 87 S.Ct. 1690 , 18 L.Ed.2d 625 (1967); Kelly v. Lethert, 362 F.2d 629 (C.A.8, 1966); Singer v. District Director of Internal Revenue, 354 F.2d 992 (C.A.2, 1966); Cash v. Campbell, 346 F.2d 670 (C.A.5, 1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jenkins v. United States
On the other hand, “it is not necessary that there be present an intent to defraud or to deprive the United States of the taxes due, nor need bad motives or wicked design be proved in order to constitute willfulness.” White, 372 F.2d at 521 ; see also Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1216 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970) (the individual’s bad purpose or evil motive in failing to collect and pay the taxes “properly play no part in the civil definition of willfulness.”); Godfrey, 748 F.2d at 1577 ; Ghandour, 36 Fed.Cl. at 62 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gary L. Dolan
See, e.g., United States v. Guglielmini, 425 F.2d 439, 443 (2d Cir.) (finding that waivers of discharge have same effect as denials of discharge although not specifically provided for in section 3284), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 820 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970); Rudin v. United States, 254 F.2d 45, 47 (6th Cir.) (finding that statute of limitations under section 3284 begins to run on the last day on which debtor could apply for a discharge), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 930 , 78 S.Ct. 1374 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1371 (1958); United States v. Zisblatt Furniture Co., 78 F.Supp. 9, 12-13 (S.D.N.Y.1948) (findi…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Landau
See, e.g., Monday v. United States (7th Cir.1970) 421 F.2d 1210, 1216 , cert. denied (1970) 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 ); Rem, 38 F.3d at 643 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arnett v. United States
Second, a responsible person can also act willfully if she “acts with a reckless disregard of a known or obvious risk that trust funds may not be remitted to the government.” Mazo v. United States, 591 F.2d 1151 , 1154 *1471 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 842 , 100 S.Ct. 82 , 62 L.Ed.2d 54 (1979); Denbo v. United States, 988 F.2d 1029, 1033 (10th Cir.1993) (same); see also Thomsen v. United States, 887 F.2d 12, 17 (1st Cir. 1989) (recognizing that “in the civil context ‘willful conduct ... may ... indicate a reckless disregard for obvious or known risks’ ” (quoting Monday v. Un…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Finley v. United States
Second, a responsible person can also act willfully if she “acts with a reckless disregard of a known or obvious risk that trust funds may not be remitted to the government.” Mazo v. United States, 591 F.2d 1151, 1154 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 842 , 100 S.Ct. 82 , 62 L.Ed.2d 54 (1979); Denbo v. United States, 988 F.2d 1029, 1033 (10th Cir.1993) (same); see also Thomsen v. United States, 887 F.2d 12, 17 (1st Cir.1989) (recognizing that “in the civil context ‘willful conduct ... may ... indicate a reckless disregard for obvious or known risks’” (quoting Monday v. United Stat…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Abel v. United States (In Re Abel)
See also Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1216 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970) (explicitly rejecting the reasonable cause exception).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marlow P. Running
See also Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1214 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Ex Rel. Internal Revenue Service v. Stanmock, Inc. (In Re Stanmock, Inc.)
(2×)
DuCharmes & Co. v. State of Michigan (In re DuCharmes & Co.), 852 F.2d 194, 196 (6th Cir.1988) (per curiam) (payments under Chapter 11 reorganization plan); United States v. Technical Knockout Graphics, Inc. (In re Technical Knockout Graphics, Inc.), 833 F.2d 797, 802-03 (9th Cir.1987) (payments made by a debtor in possession under Chapter 11 prior to confirmation of a plan); In re Ribs-R-Us, Inc., 828 F.2d 199, 204 (3d Cir.1987) (payments under Chapter 11 reorganization plan); see also Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1218 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert W. Sawyer v. United States
See also, Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1214 (7th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (“Liability attaches to those with power and responsibility within the corporate structure for seeing that taxes withheld from various sources are remitted to the Government.”) (citations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David Schon, Peter Schon, and Cadwallader & Johnson, Inc., Plaintiffs v. United States
(2×)
Sec. 6672 (West 1984); see also Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1213-15 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hutchinson v. United States
See also Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210 (7th Cir.), cert. den. 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.Ed.2d 48 (1970), on remand, 342 F.Supp. 1271 (D.Wis.1972); Spivak v. United States, 370 F.2d 612 (2nd Cir.1967), cert. den. 387 U.S. 908 , 87 S.Ct. 1690 , 18 L.Ed.2d 625 (1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Merkle C. Altom v. United States
See also United States v. Hood, 422 F.2d 737, 741-742 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 400 U.S. 820 , 91 S.Ct. 38 , 27 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Deane Hill Country Club, Inc.
v.
Shultz, Secretary of Labor
v.
Shultz, Secretary of Labor
No. 185.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1970.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.