green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.8 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Siegel Transfer, Inc. v. Carrier Express, Inc.
private party injured by a violation of the act must seek remedial relief from the commission.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,033 James L. Shores, Jr., as of the Estate of Clarence E. Bishop, Jr., Etc. v. Jerald H. Sklar
where the success of a fraud does not require an exercise of volition by the plaintiff, but instead requires an exercise of volition by other persons, there need be no showing that the plaintiff himself relied upon the deception
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,823 Crane Company v. American Standard, Inc. And Blyth & Co., Inc.
crane ii
discussed
Cited "see"
Bischoff v. GK Scott & Co., Inc.
See Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787, 797 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970); List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457, 462-63 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ross v. Bolton
These allegations clearly charge the Bolton defendants with an attempt at “artificially affecting market activity in order to mislead investors,” Santa Fe Industries, supra, 430 U.S. at 477 , 97 S.Ct. at 1302 ; see Crane Company v. Westinghouse Air Brake Company, (2d Cir.1969) 419 F.2d 787 , cert. denied, (1970) 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 ; Landy v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., (3d Cir.1973) 486 F.2d 139 , 161, cert. denied 416 U.S. 960 , 94 S.Ct. 1979 , 40 L.Ed.2d 312 (1974) (a scheme deliberately calculated to manipulate market value of stock violates the securities l…
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Lemar
See Vitello v. United States, 425 F.2d 416, 422 (9th Cir.) (two to one decision), cert, denied, 400 U.S. 822 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gregory Scott Ferris
See Vitello v. United States, 425 F.2d 416 (9th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 43 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970); United States v. Friedman, 445 F.2d 1076 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 958 , 92 S.Ct. 326 , 30 L.Ed.2d 275 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sanders v. Thrall Car Manufacturing Co.
See Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787, 797 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970); Vine v. Beneficial Fi *964 nance, supra. Plaintiff’s argument essentially is that Thrall, by failing to disclose material information regarding Chamberlain during the period in which it was acquiring over 50 percent of the company’s stock (Comp. ¶ 28), and by announcing prior to the actual tender offer its intention to offer $26.50 per share when it intended to offer $30.00 per share (Comp. ¶ 57), artificially depressed the price at which these sh…
discussed
Cited "see"
Madison Consultants v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787, 797 (2d Cir.1969) (owner forced to sell by antitrust considerations), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970); Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir.) (shareholders forced out in short-form merger), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Madison Consultants v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
See Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787, 797 (2d Cir.1969) (owner forced to sell by antitrust considerations), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970); Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir.) (shareholders forced out in short-form merger), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brooks v. Land Drilling Co.
See, Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787, 794 (2nd Cir.1969) cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970) and Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., supra. The allegations in plaintiffs’ twelfth claim are within the definition of “purchase or sale” of a security.
cited
Cited "see"
Kennecott Copper Corporation v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation
See Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787, 800 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert J. Kehoe
See Vitello v. United States, 425 F,2d 416, 422 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 43 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Birdie Louise Joshua Harris, United States of America v. Billy Charles Harris
(2×)
See United States v. Brooks, 473 F.2d 817 (CA9 1973), and Vitello v. United States, 425 F.2d 416 (CA9 1970), cert. denied 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 43 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.
(2×)
See Vitello v. United States, 9 Cir., 425 F.2d 416, 418 , cert. denied 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 43 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 ; United States v. Edmondson, 5 Cir., 410 F.2d 670, 673, n. 6 , cert. denied 396 U.S. 966 , 90 S.Ct. 444 , 24 L.Ed.2d 430 .
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,405 Joe L. Smallwood v. Pearl Brewing Company, Southdown, Inc., Zapata Norness, Inc., Albert J. Rangeand D. Doyle Mize
See Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 2 Cir. 1969, 419 F.2d 787, 798 , cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 ; A. T.
discussed
Cited "see"
American Standard, Inc. v. Crane Co.
See, Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970) ; Crane Co. v. American Standard, 326 F.Supp. 766 (S.D.N.Y.1971) ; American Standard v. Crane Co., 346 F.Supp. 1153 (S.D.N.Y. 1972). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Korn v. Franchard Corporation
See Moscarelli v. Stamm, 288 F.Supp. 453, 462 (E.D.N.Y.1968) 18 Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787, 797 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 ; Epstein v. Weiss, supra, 50 F.R.D. at 393 ; Bromberg, Securities Law: SEC Rule 10b-5, Sec. 8, 6, p. 209 (1968); Bernfeld, "Class Actions and Federal Securities Laws", 55 Cornell L.Rev. 78, 84, n. 43 (1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gershon v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
See, e.g., Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970); Gibson v. Cannon, 325 F.Supp. 706 (E.D.Pa.1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Cooks
See also Vitello v United States, 425 F2d 416, 419 (CA 9, 1970), cert den 400 US 822 (1970) (in a pre-Gipson case, the defendant’s conviction of perjury was affirmed despite the fact that the trial court "failed to instruct the jury that all twelve jurors must unanimously agree upon at least one of the [three] statements as charged in the indictment”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Malenfant
To make out a subsection 9(a)(2) claim, the plaintiff must show “(1) a series of transactions in a security creating actual or apparent trading in that security or raising or depressing the price of that security, (2) carried out with scienter and (3)for the purpose of inducing the security’s sale or purchase by others ...” Id. at 1164 (footnotes omitted); See also Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970); Baum v. Phillips, Appel & Walden, Inc., 648 F.Supp. 1518 (S.D.N.Y.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Sutton Regan, Jack Z. Rabinowitz, Steven Barry Smotrich, Charles M. Zarzecki, Paul A. Berkman, and Bruce Lee Newberg
(2×)
See, e.g., Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787, 792-93 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Darin Ray Goodrich
See, e.g., Vitello v. United States, 425 F.2d 416, 418 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 43 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,777, 11 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 781 Chemetron Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Business Funds, Inc., Cross-Appellees
See, e.g., Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787, 794 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970), on remand on other grounds, 326 F.Supp. 766 (S.D.N.Y.1971), rev'd on other grounds, 490 F.2d 332 (2d Cir. 1973); supra n.28. . § 9(a)(2). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frankel v. Wyllie & Thornhill, Inc.
See Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462, 479-81 (5th Cir. 1981) (Randall, J., dissenting); see also Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787, 797 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970); Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 635 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,148 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Monarch Fund, Aspen Fund II and Bruce B. Paul
See, e. g., Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787, 796 (2d Cir. 1969) (person acquiring information in course of negotiations with company), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970); Van Alstyne, Noel & Co., 43 S.E.C. 1080, 1081-86 (1969) (underwriters).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Clark v. Cameron-Brown Co.
See, e. g., Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787, 799-801 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,496 Richard J. Sargent v. Genesco, Inc.
(2×)
See also, Crane v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Englund v. Chavez
(2×)
Thus, in Garment Workers v. Labor Board (1961) 366 U.S. 731, 738 [ 6 L.Ed.2d 762, 768 , 81 S.Ct. 1603 ], the United States Supreme Court declared unambiguously that “[t]he law has long been settled that a grant of exclusive recognition to a minority union constitutes unlawful support [of a labor organization] in violation of . . . section [8(a)(2)].” Other federal cases have uniformly agreed that “an employer violates section 8(a)(2) of the Act when he recognizes one of two competing unions as exclusive bargaining agent if, at the time of recognition, the employer had actual or construct…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Milford E. Cook
(2×)
See also Vitello v. United States, 425 F.2d 416, 425 (9th Cir.) (dissenting opinion), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 43 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970). 54 II.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cambridge Cap. Corp. v. NORTHWESTERN NAT. BANK OF MPLS.
See, e. g., Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970) (Party who had not sold stock at time of suit had standing to sue under § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, because if suit were not successful, antitrust considerations would require it to sell its stock; party was considered a “forced seller.”); A. T.
Crane Co.
v.
Westinghouse Air Brake Co.
v.
Westinghouse Air Brake Co.
No. 212.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1970.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.