green
Positive treatment
7.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 44 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tommy Briscoe
See United States v. Budzanoski, 462 F.2d 443, 449-52 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 271 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. v. Murray
See United States v. Cook, 461 F.2d 906 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 (1972) (found no plain error when defendant's attorney introduced co-defendants' guilty pleas) and United States v. Bass, 562 F.2d 967 (5th Cir. 1977) (no plain error where: government elicited guilty pleas, no objection by defense, and defense emphasized guilty pleas on cross- examination).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis J. Murray
See United States v. Cook, 461 F.2d 906 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 269 , 34 L.Ed.2d 219 (1972) (found no plain error when defendant’s attorney introduced co-defendants’ guilty pleas) and United States v. Bass, 562 F.2d 967 (5th Cir.1977) (no plain error where: government elicited guilty pleas, no objection by defense, and defense emphasized guilty pleas on cross-examination).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bahnmiller v. Derwinski
See, Rodulfa v. United States, 295 F.Supp. 28 (D.D.C.1969), appeal dismissed, 461 F.Supp. 1240 , cert. denied 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 270 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972) (purpose of statute prohibiting fees in cases involving veterans' benefits is to prevent unscrupulous *1214 persons from receiving undeserved fees).
discussed
Cited "see"
Feddiman v. State
See Atkins v. State, Del.Supr., 523 A.2d 539, 543-545 (1987), (discussing United States v. Carson, 464 F.2d 424 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 268 , 34 L.Ed.2d 219 (1972); United States v. Turner, 528 F.2d 143 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 996 , 96 S.Ct. 426 , 46 L.Ed.2d 371 (1975)).
cited
Cited "see"
Georgia Association of Retarded Citizens v. Dr. Charles McDaniel in His Official Capacity as State Superintendent of Schools
See de Rodulfa v. United States, 461 F.2d 1240 , 1250 n. 50 (D.C.Cir.) (listing cases), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 98 S.Ct. 270 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
MORGAN GUAR. TR. CO. OF NY v. Republic of Palau
See de Rodulfa v. United States, 461 F.2d 1240, 1252-53 (D.C.Cir.) (until action is finally disposed of, including appellate process, legislation may abate proceedings), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 270 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
William T. Higgins v. John R. Kelley, Thomas J. Sisterman, Ralph Mayer, Allan N. Hopen
See De Rodulfa v. United States, 461 F.2d 1240, 1257 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 270 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972); Milliken v. Gleason, 332 F.2d 122, 123 (1st Cir.1964) (per curiam), ce rt. denied, 379 U.S. 1002 , 85 S.Ct. 723 , 13 L.Ed.2d 703 (1965); see also Johnson v. Robison, 415 U.S. 361, 366-67 , 94 S.Ct. 1160, 1165 , 39 L.Ed.2d 389 (1974) (section 211(a) not a bar to constitutional challenge of underlying benefit statute).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ivan Buljubasic and Slobodan Pavlovic
See United States v. Tanner, 471 F.2d 128, 137 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 269 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jones
See United States v. Carson, 464 F.2d 424, 436 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 268 , 34 L.Ed.2d 219 (1972); United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114, 118-19 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2256 , 29 L.Ed.2d 711 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stuart Steven Noble
See United States v. Tanner, 471 F.2d 128, 135-36 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 269 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vesich
Accord, United States v. Carson, 464 F.2d 424, 436 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 268 , 34 L.Ed.2d 219 (1972); United States v. Nickels, 502 F.2d 1173, 1176 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 426 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 2237 , 48 L.Ed.2d 837 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca2 1982
See generally United States v. Valencia, supra, 645 F.2d at 1178 (explication of Reed facts) 14 At the Philadelphia due process hearing before Judge Fullam, Errichetti and Criden, testifying under an arrangement that precluded use of their testimony against them, both alleged that, acting at Weinberg's behest, they had told the Congressmen that money could be obtained simply by pretending to give assurances of using Congressional influence 15 Appellants have no basis for complaint because Judge Pratt gave them an opportunity, accepted by defendants in the Myers trial, to try to persuade the ju…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Boffa
E. g., United States v. Olin Corp., 465 F.Supp. 1120, 1134-35 (W.D.N.Y.1979); United States v. McGrath, 459 F.Supp. 1271, 1273 (S.D.N.Y.1978); United States v. Winchester, supra, 407 F.Supp. at 277-78 ; United States v. Wolfson, 294 F.Supp. 267, 271-72 (D.Del.1968); see United States v. Budzanoski, 462 F.2d 443, 454 (C.A.3), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 271 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John L. Warren, Jr., David Defina, Des E. Schick and Thomas A. Warren
(2×)
See United States v. Tanner, 471 F.2d 128, 140 (7th Cir.), Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 269 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Felt
See United States v. Tanner, 279 F.Supp. 457, 470 (N.D.Ill.1967), rev’d on other grounds, 471 F.2d 128 (7th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 . 93 S.Ct. 269 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972) (cited approvingly in Notes of Advisory Committee on 1974 Amendments to Rules of Criminal Procedure, 62 F.R.D. 271 , 311 (1975)); Rezneck, The New Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 54 Geo.L.J. 1276, 1278-80 (1966) (discussing meaning of “materiality” in predecessor to Rule 16(a)(1)(C)); cf. United States v. Crow Dog, 532 F.2d 1182, 1189 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 929 , 97 S.Ct. 1547 , 51 L…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pasquale Matassini, A/K/A Pat Matassini, and Robert E. Rodriguez
United States v. Blue Sea Line, 553 F.2d 445, 448 (5th Cir. 1977); see De Rodulfa v. United States, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 154 , 161, 461 F.2d 1240, 1247 , cert. denied 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 270 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972): Prospective rather than retrospective application is decidedly the preferred judicial treatment of legislation.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Uco Oil Company, and Donald Simeon
See United States v. Tanner, 471 F.2d 128, 138-139 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 269 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ziviak v. United States
See DeRodulfa v. United States, 149 U.S. App.D.C. 154, 461 F.2d 1240 , 1257, cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 270 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972); Van Horne v. Hines, 74 App.D.C. 214 , 122 F.2d 207, 209 , cert. denied, 314 U.S. 689 , 62 S.Ct. 360 , 86 L.Ed. 552 (1941); Taylor v. United States, 379 F.Supp. 642, 649 (W.D.Ark.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Winchester
See generally, United States v. Budzanoski, 462 F.2d 443, 454 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 271 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972); United States v. Slawik, 408 F.Supp. 190, 201 (D.Del. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. Washington
See De Rodulfa v. United States, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 154 , 164, 461 F.2d 1240, 1250 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 270 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972), and cases cited; Womack v. Lynn, 164 U.S.App.D.C. 198 , 504 F.2d 267 (1974). 3 Davis v. Washington, 348 F.Supp. 15, 17 (D.D.C.1972) 4 The defendants were Walter E.
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. Washington
See De Rodulfa v. United States, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 154 , 164, 461 F.2d 1240, 1250 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 270 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972), and cases cited; Womack v. Lynn, 164 U.S.App.D.C. 198 , 504 F.2d 267 (1974). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Constancia A. Vda De Daylo v. Administrator of Veterans' Affairs
See generally Johnson v. Robison, 415 U.S. 361, 366-374 , 94 S.Ct. 1160, 1165-1169 , 39 L. 13d.2d 389 (1974), and de Rodulfa v. United States, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 154 , 158-164, 461 F.2d 1240, 1244-1250 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 270 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leon Weiss
See United States v. Carson, 464 F.2d 424, 436 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 268 , 34 L.Ed.2d 219 (1972); United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114, 118-119 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2256 , 29 L.Ed.2d 711 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dr. Bruce E. Hodges
See United States v. Carson, 464 F.2d 424 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 268 , 34 L.Ed.2d 219 ; United States v. Skillman, 442 F.2d 542 (8th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 833 , 92 S.Ct. 82 , 30 L.Ed.2d 63 ; United States v. Carlson, 423 F.2d 431 (9th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 847 , 91 S.Ct. 94 , 27 L.Ed.2d 84 . 9 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Neal
See, e.g., United States v. Carson, 464 F. 2d 424 (2 Cir.1972), cert. den. 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 268 , 34 L.Ed. 2d 219 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Mario Chalarca, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Carson, 464 F.2d 424, 437 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 268 , 34 L.Ed.2d 219 (1972); see also United States v. Chiarizio, 525 F.2d 289, 293 (2d Cir.1975) ("In cases where the defense and prosecution disagree as to the contents of the tape, the proper procedure is for the jury to receive transcripts of both sides' versions.").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jin Tang Huang
Because Shum had a substantial opportunity to become familiar with Huang's voice, the audio tapes were properly authenticated. 14 We also reject Huang's contention that the district court erred in admitting the transcript containing his response, "Ah," to Zheng's comment that the heroin was "like almost 200 degree." In United States v. Chiarizio, 525 F.2d 289 (2d Cir.1975), we stated that, "where the defense and prosecution disagree as to the contents of the tape, the proper procedure is for the jury to receive transcripts of both sides' versions." Id. at 293 ; see also United States v. Carson…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ruiz
See also, United States v. Carson, 464 F.2d 424, 436 (2d Cir.) cert. denied 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 268 , 34 L.Ed.2d 219 (1972); United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114, 118-19 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2256 , 29 L.Ed.2d 711 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alphonso Galloway Burroughs, Clifton Weldon Rogers, A/K/A \Shotgun
See United States v. Ford, 324 F.2d 950, 952 (7th Cir.1963); see also United States v. Cook, 461 F.2d 906 , 910 n. 3 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 269 , 34 L.Ed.2d 219 (1972). 7 However, reasonable inferences from the evidence presented against Rogers authorized the jury to find that a joint objective between Rogers, Burroughs, and Rimes indeed existed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Russell Wayne Anderson v. Usair, Inc
See, e.g., DeRodulfa v. United States, 461 F.2d 1240 , 1247 (D.C.Cir.), ce rt. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 270 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972); Hospital Employees Labor Program of Metropolitan Chicago v. Ridgeway Hospital, 570 F.2d 167, 169-70 (7th Cir.1978) (quoting In re Reilly, 442 F.2d 26, 28 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 854 , 92 S.Ct. 96 , 30 L.Ed.2d 95 (1971) (“[Ajmendatory statutes generally operate prospectively only absent strong congressional intent to the contrary----”)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Guy W. Kissinger v. United States Postal Service
News 2318, 2324; see also United States v. Budzanoski, 462 F.2d 443, 449-50 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 271 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972). *554 Kissinger has therefore pleaded guilty to acts of criminal irresponsibility in handling the property of others.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Slotnick v. United States
See, e.g., DeRodulfa v. United States, 461 F.2d 1240 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 270 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972); Holley v. United States, 352 F.Supp. 175 (D.C.Ohio 1972), aff'd, 477 F.2d 600 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1023 , 94 S.Ct. 446 , 38 L.Ed.2d 314 (1973). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John W. Sliker, John Carbone, and Theodore Buchwald, A/K/A \Bucky
This is the course which this court has recommended, United States v. Bryant, 480 F.2d 785, 789 (2d Cir.1973); see also United States v. Carson, 464 F.2d 424, 436-37 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 268 , 34 L.Ed.2d 219 (1972), although it would have been preferable for the judge to have done it in camera.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Family Division Trial Lawyers of the Superior court-d.c., Inc. v. H. Carl Moultrie, Chief Judge, D.C. Superior Court
(2×)
Thus, the lawyer has consented to, and assumed, this obligation and when he is called upon to fulfill it, he cannot contend that it is a “taking of his services.” Id. at 635; see also DeRodulfa v. United States, 461 F.2d 1240 , 1256 (D.C.Cir.1972) (dicta), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 270 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 ; Williamson v. Vardeman, 674 F.2d 1211, 1214 (8th Cir.1982); White v. United States Pipe & Foundry Co., 646 F.2d 203 , 205 & n. 3 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward Joseph Wedelstedt
See also United States v. Tanner, 471 F.2d 128, 139-40 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 269 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hercules Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Compare In re District of Columbia Workmen’s Compensation Act, 180 U.S.App.D.C. 216, 219-222 , 554 F.2d 1075, 1078-81 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 820 , 97 S.Ct. 67 , 50 L.Ed.2d 81 (1976) with De Rodulfa v. United States, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 154 , 161, 164-167, 461 F.2d 1240, 1247, 1250-53, cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 270 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
cadc 1978
Compare In re District of Columbia Workmen's Compensation Act, 180 U.S.App.D.C. 216, 219-222 , 554 F.2d 1075, 1078-81 , Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 820 , 97 S.Ct. 67 , 50 L.Ed.2d 81 (1976) With De Rodulfa v. United States, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 154 , 161, 164-167, 461 F.2d 1240 , 1247, 1250-53, Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 270 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972). 17 Congress passed the 1972 Act in an effort to deal with the regulatory problems that had hindered efforts to control water pollution.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
American Training Services, Inc. v. Veterans Administration
See, e. g., De Rodulfa v. United States, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 154 , 461 F.2d 1240, 1256-1258 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 270 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972), and cases cited therein.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Winters
See, e.g., United States v. Carson, 464 F. 2d 424 (2 Cir.1972), cert. den. 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 268 , 34 L.Ed. 2d 219 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William L. Calley, Jr., Cross-Appellant v. Howard H. Callaway, Etc., Etc., Cross-Appellees
(2×)
Compare United States v. Budzanowski, 3 Cir., 1972, 462 F.2d 443, 453-154 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 271 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 ; Tasby v. United States, 8 Cir., 1971, 451 F.2d 391 , 394, cert. denied, 406 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 1787 , 32 L.Ed.2d 122 (1972); United States v. Addonizio, 3 Cir., 1971, 451 F.2d 49, 66-67 , cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1048 , 92 S.Ct. 1309 , 31 L.Ed.2d 591 (1972); Rees v. Payton, 4 Cir., 1965, 341 F.2d 859, 863-864 (en banc); Estes v. United States, 5 Cir., 1964, 335 F.2d 609, 614-615 , cert. denied, 379 U.S. 964 , 85 S.Ct. 656 , 13 L.Ed.2d 559 ; United States v. Ba…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alvin E. Young, Appeal of Robert Green
See, e. g., United States v. Tanner, 471 F.2d 128, 141 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 269 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972); United States v. Palermo, 410 F.2d 468, 470 (7th Cir. 1969); United States v. Edwards, 366 F.2d 853, 872 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 919 , 87 S.Ct. 882 , 17 L.Ed.2d 790 (1967); United States v. Cohen, 197 F.2d 26, 29 (3d Cir. 1952).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Langston v. Johnson
See also de Rodulfa v. United States, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 154 , 158-159, 461 F.2d 1240, 1245-1246 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 270 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lathall D. Langston v. Donald E. Johnson, Administrator of Veterans Affairs
See also de Rodulfa v. United States, 149 U.S. App.D.C. 154, 158-159, 461 F.2d 1240, 1245-1246 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 270 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972) 3 As amended, the section provides: On and after October 17, 1940, except as provided in sections 775, 784, and as to matters arising under chapter 37 of this title, the decisions of the Administrator on any question of law or fact under any law administered by the Veterans' Administration providing benefits for veterans and their dependents or survivors shall be final and conclusive and no other official or any court of the United S…
Buffalo Cab Co., Inc.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 72-192.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 24, 1972.
409 U.S. 949
Published
C. A. 5th. Cir. Certiorari denied.