green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
McCabe v. Foley
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 264 (1st Cm.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Ana Josefina Gonzalez Turul v. Rogatol Distributors, Inc., Belisario Araujo and Guillermo Araujo
See In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 263 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Heidi D. Mattson v. Brown University, Etc.
Accord, e.g., Cohen v. Franchard Corp., 478 F.2d 115, 122 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973); McAdam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 896 F.2d 750 , 769 n. 29 (3rd Cir.1990); Richmond v. Madison Management Group, Inc., 918 F.2d 438 , 454 (4th Cir.1990); Industrial Dev.
cited
Cited "see"
In re Consumers Power Co. Derivative Litigation
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973); Lewis v. Graves, 701 F.2d at 248 .
cited
Cited "see"
Allison Ex Rel. General Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smachlo v. Birkelo
Therefore, the corporate management must be given the first opportunity to institute the litigation since, “[a]s a general principle, the responsibility for determining whether or not a corporation shall enforce in the courts a cause of action for damages is, like other business questions, ordinarily a matter of internal management left to the discretion of the directors.” Landy v. Federal Deposit Insurance Company, 486 F.2d 139, 146 (3d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 960 , 94 S.Ct. 1979 , 40 L.Ed.2d 312 (1974); see In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 263 (1st Cir.), cert.…
cited
Cited "see"
Abbott v. Shaffer
See Rudisell v. Fifth Third Bank, 622 F.2d 243, 246 (6th Cir.1980), citing Wachtel v. West, 476 F.2d 1062, 1064-5 (6th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 874 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 114 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Curtis
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 , 263 & n.4 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Curtis
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 , 263 & n.4 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
H. M. Greenspun v. Del E. Webb Corporation, Etc.
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 264 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rose Hall, Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Overseas Banking Corp.
Hawes v. Oakland, 104 U.S. 450, 461 , 26 L.Ed. 827 (1881); Ainscow v. Sanitary Co. of America, 21 Del.Ch. 35, 36-37 , 180 A. 614 (Ch.1935); see In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 263 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Elfenbein v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973); Brooks v. American Export Industries, Inc., 68 F.R.D. 506 (S.D.N.Y.1975); Phillips v. Bradford, 62 F.R.D. 681 (S.D.N.Y. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mid-America Food Service, Inc. v. Ara Services, Inc.
See Cohen v. Franchard Corp., 478 F.2d 115 , 122 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973); Marx & Co., Inc. v. Diner’s Club, Inc., 400 F.Supp. 581, 585 (S.D.N.Y.1975), modified on other grounds, 550 F.2d 505 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 861 , 98 S.Ct. 188 , 54 L.Ed.2d 134 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shlensky v. Dorsey
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 263 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973). 47 The plaintiffs argue that Rule 23.1 is intended to benefit the corporation and its directors only and that, therefore, Price Waterhouse lacks standing to raise the defense of noncompliance with the Rule, particularly since counsel representing Gulf and several of its directors waived the right of those defendants to assert a defense based upon the rule.
cited
Cited "see"
Shlensky v. Dorsey
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 263 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Augusta v. Marshall Motor Co.
See Wachtel v. West, 476 F.2d 1062 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 874 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 114 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gross v. Diversified Mortgage Investors
Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185 , 96 S.Ct. 1375 , 47 L.Ed.2d 668 (1976); see Cohen v. Franchard Corp., 478 F.2d 115,123 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973); Shemtob v. Shearson Hammill & Co., supra at 445.
discussed
Cited "see"
Industrial Development Board v. Fuqua Industries, Inc.
Wright & A. Miller, supra, at 639-40; see Cohen v. Franchard Corp., 2 Cir. 1973, 478 F.2d 115 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 ; Krock v. Electric Motor & Repair Co., 1 Cir. 1964, 327 F.2d 213, 215 , cert. denied, 377 U.S. 934 , 84 S.Ct. 1338 , 12 L.Ed.2d 298 ; Hasselbrink v. Speelman, 6 Cir. 1957, 246 F.2d 34, 39 ; Sweeney v. United Feature Syndicate, Inc., 2 Cir. 1942, 129 F.2d 904 .
discussed
Cited "see"
The Industrial Development Board of the Town of Section, Alabama v. Fuqua Industries, Inc., the Industrial Development Board of the City of Fort Payne, Alabama v. Fuqua Industries, Inc.
Wright & A. Miller, Supra, at 639-40; See Cohen v. Franchard Corp., 2 Cir. 1973, 478 F.2d 115 , Cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 ; Krock v. Electric Motor & Repair Co., 1 Cir. 1964, 327 F.2d 213, 215 , Cert. denied, 377 U.S. 934 , 84 S.Ct. 1338 , 12 L.Ed.2d 298 ; Hasselbrink v. Speelman, 6 Cir. 1957, 246 F.2d 34, 39 ; Sweeney v. United Feature Syndicate, Inc., 2 Cir. 1942, 129 F.2d 904 . 47 The purpose of Rule 51 is to "prevent unnecessary new trials because of errors the judge might have corrected if they had been brought to his attention at the proper time".
cited
Cited "see"
Marx & Co., Inc. v. DINERS'CLUB, INC.
Jennings v. Boenning & Co., 388 F.Supp. 1294, 1303-04 (E.D.Pa.1975); see Cohen v. Franchard Corp., 478 F.2d 115 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Ireland v. Wynkoop
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 ; Nussbacher v. Continental Illinois Bank & Trust Co., supra .
discussed
Cited "see"
Strader v. BENEFICIAL FINANCE COMPANY OF AURORA
See Wachtel v. West, 476 F.2d 1062 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 874 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 114 ; Stevens v. Rock Springs National Bank, 497 F.2d 307 (10th Cir.); see also Littlefield v. Walt Flanagan & Co., 498 F. 2d 1133 (10th Cir.).
cited
Cited "see"
Nussbacher v. Continental Illinois Bank & Trust Co.
See In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 264 (1st Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 107 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 414 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Sapient Corporation Derivative Litigation
See also Shlensky v. Dorsey, 574 F.2d 131, 142 (3d Cir.1978) ("To hold that demands to satisfy Rule 23.1 may be made on the directors after a derivative suit has been initiated would be to reduce the demand requirement of the rule to a meaningless formality.”) (citing In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 263 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973)). 34 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Symbol Technologies Securities Litigation
See also In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 263 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973); Brooks v. American Export Industries, Inc., 68 F.R.D. 506 , 509 *515 (S.D.N.Y.1975); Phillips v. Bradford, 62 F.R.D. 681, 685 (S.D.N.Y.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oye ex rel. Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Swartz
See also In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257, 263 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973); Brooks v. American Export Industries, Inc., 68 F.R.D. 506, 509 (S.D.N.Y.1975); Phillips v. Bradford, 62 F.R.D. 681, 685 (S.D.N.Y.1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hayer v. National Bank of Alaska
See, e. g., Wachtel v. West, 476 F.2d 1062, 1065 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 874 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 114 (1973); Chevalier v. Baird Savings Ass’n, 371 F.Supp. 1282, 1284 (E.D.Pa.1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Oldfield v. Alston
See, e. g., In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Abbe v. Goss
Compare Nussbacher v. Continental Illinois Nat’l Bank, 518 F.2d 873 (7th Cir. 1975) with In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fox v. Kane-Miller Corp.
Compare, e. g., Myzel v. Fields, 386 F.2d 718, 734-35 (8th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 951 , 88 S.Ct. 1043 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1143 (1968), with, e.g., Cohen v. Franchard Corp., 478 F.2d 115, 123 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973). 22 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tasner v. Billera
See also In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Action, 479 F.2d 257 (1st Cir. 1973), cert. denied 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S.Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973); Robison v. Caster, 356 F.2d 924 (7th Cir. 1966).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Abrams v. Mayflower Investors, Inc.
See also In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 (1st Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 857 , 94 S. Ct. 161 , 38 L.Ed.2d 107 (1973); Robison v. Caster, 356 F.2d 924 (7th Cir. 1966).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wachtel et ux.
v.
West et ux.
v.
West et ux.
No. 73-89.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
Certiorari.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.