green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.7 score
“public-spirited citizens volunteer to perform their civic duties in serving on boards such as those involving zoning”
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 43 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Cecil Grafton Rose
But see Johnson v. Patterson, 475 F.2d 1066 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 878 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Abc, Inc.)
t seems highly unlikely that was viewing the term as broadly as courts have done in other contexts....
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Breon v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
the person claiming the attorney-client privilege has the burden of establishing all essential elements
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of Groton
public-spirited citizens volunteer to perform their civic duties in serving on boards such as those involving zoning
discussed
Cited "see"
Verrillo v. Zoning Board of Appeals
See Carini v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 164 Conn. 169, 173 , 319 A.2d 390 (1972) (‘‘[t]he board’s power is restricted to that provided by the zoning ordi- nance in accordance with legislative or statutory enact- ments’’), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 831 , 94 S. Ct. 64 , 38 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gorman v. Polar Electro, Inc.
See In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); United States Postal Service v. Phelps Dodge Refining Corp., 852 F.Supp. 156 , 159 (E.D.N.Y.1994).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Schubert
See In re Horowitz, 482 F. 2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.1973), cert. den. 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 86 (1973); Sew'n Sweep, Inc. v. Swiss-Bernina, Inc., 91 F.R.D. 254, 258-259 (N.D.Ill. 1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Duttle v. Bandler & Kass
See In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918, 921 (2d Cir.1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of Nackson
See In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973) [rehearing den. 414 U.S. 1052 , 94 S.Ct. 556 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 340 (1973)].
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Miguel Morales-Quinones
“Crafty questioning may constitute ‘comment’ despite its obliquity.” United States v. Helina, 549 F.2d 713, 718 (9th Cir.1977); see Johnson v. Patterson, 475 F.2d 1066, 1068 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 878 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Von BULOW BY AUERSPERG v. Von Bulow
Moreover, "[e]videntiary privileges in litigation are not favored and even those rooted in the Constitution must give way in proper circumstances." Herbert v. Lando, 441 U.S. 153, 175 , 99 S.Ct. 1635, 1648 , 60 L.Ed.2d 115 (1979); accord In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
von Bulow ex rel. Auersperg v. von Bulow
Moreover, “[ejvidentiary privileges in litigation are not favored and even those rooted in the Constitution must give way in proper circumstances.” Herbert v. Lando, 441 U.S. 153, 175 , 99 S.Ct. 1635, 1648 , 60 L.Ed.2d 115 (1979); accord In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United States
United States v. Bein, 728 F.2d 107 at 112 (2d Cir.1984) (quoting United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918, 921 (2d Cir.1961)); accord In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 , 80-81 n. 7 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bernard P. Elkin, A/K/A \Bob Elkin
See United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918, 921 (2d Cir.1961); accord In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 , 80-81 n. 7 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Calvin Bein, Thomas Deangelis, Albert Vitti, and Arthur Billups
United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918, 921 (2d Cir.1961); accord In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 , 80-81 n. 7 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven v. Hershenow, Stuart M. Rosenthal, Steven A. Shraiar
See In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 , 87 n.20 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Silvestain
See In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 , 86 n.19 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); United States v. Jones, 630 F.2d 1073, 1076-80 (5th Cir. 1980); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 520 F.2d 904, 906-07 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 778 , 46 L.Ed.2d 639 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Silvestain
See In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 , 86 n.19 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); United States v. Jones, 630 F.2d 1073, 1076-80 (5th Cir. 1980); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 520 F.2d 904, 906-07 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 778 , 46 L.Ed.2d 639 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Robert M. McCoy and Charles Sussman
See generally, In re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon Horowitz, 2 Cir. 1973, 482 F.2d 72, 75-79 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 .
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Stolar
See In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum, Etc.
See In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 79 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973) ; Schwimmer v. United States, supra, 232 F.2d at p. 863 ; In re Morgan, supra, 377 F.Supp. at p. 285 ; In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 203 F.Supp. 575, 579 (S.D.N.Y.1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fisher
See Judge Friendly’s scholarly treatment in In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 75-79 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973), and in The Fifth Amendment Tomorrow: The Case for Constitutional Change, 37 U.Cin.L.Rev. 671, 701-703 (1968). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fisher
See Judge Friendly's scholarly treatment in In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 75-79 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973), and in The Fifth Amendment Tomorrow: The Case for Constitutional Change, 37 U.Cin.L.Rev. 671, 701-703 (1968) 11 Corporate and union records and records of at least certain partnerships actually possessed by the custodians in a representative rather than a personal capacity cannot be the subject of the personal privilege against self-incrimination.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MacKenzie-Childs LLC v. MacKenzie-Childs
See also In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2d Cir.) (since the attorney-client privilege “stands in derogation of the public’s right to every man’s evidence, ... it ought to be strictly confined within the narrowest possible limits consistent with the logic of its principle”) (internal citations and quotations omitted), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); United States v. Stewart, 2002 WL 1300059 , *5 (S.D.N.Y.2002) (because attorney-client privilege is rooted in policy, not the constitution, it “cannot stand in the face of countervailing law or strong pub…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aktiebolag v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The party claiming the benefit of the attorney-client privilege has the burden of establishing all essential elements. von Bulow v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 144 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); see, e.g., In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fletcher v. Atex, Inc.
See, e.g., In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 reh. denied, 414 U.S. 1052 , 94 S.Ct. 556 , 38 L.Ed.2d 340 (1973); United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918, 923 (2d Cir.1961); Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp., 150 F.R.D. 465, 470 (S.D.N.Y.1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.
See, e.g., In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918, 923 (2d Cir.1961); In re Minebea Co., 143 F.R.D. 494, 503 (S.D.N.Y.1992); Martin v. Valley Nat’l Bank, 140 F.R.D. 291, 302 (S.D.N.Y.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Golden Trade v. Lee Apparel Co.
See, e.g., In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d at 923 ; Martin v. Valley Nat’l Bank, 140 F.R.D. at 302.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin v. Valley National Bank
See, e.g., In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918, 923 (2d Cir.1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated May 9, 1990
See also In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 85 (2d Cir.1973) (“[N]o Supreme Court decision has upheld a Fifth Amendment claim predicated solely, or even primarily, on the basis of an invasion of privacy...."), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973). 23 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Sealed Case
See, e.g., In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 , 82 n. 10 (2d Cir.) (discussing debate), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.
(2×)
See, e.g., In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 [ 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 ] (1973); Burke v. New York City Police Department, 115 F.R.D. 220 , 231 n. 8 (S.D.N.Y.1987); Apex Oil Company v. DiMauro, 110 F.R.D. 490 , 493-94 n. 3 (S.D.N.Y.1985); Gulf Oil Corporation v. Schlesinger, 465 F.Supp. 913, 916 (E.D.Penn.1979). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Burke v. New York City Police Department
See, e.g., In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); Apex Oil Co. v. DiMauro, 110 F.R.D. 490 , 493-94 n. 3 (S.D.N.Y.1985). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Pittsburgh v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.
See, e.g., In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 87 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); 2 Weinstein’s Evidence, supra, U 501[01] at 501-13 (discussing Advisory Committee’s rationale for proposed federal rules governing privileges). 13 Indeed, this policy was underscored in the legislative history of Fed.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
O'Leary v. Purcell Co.
See also, In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2nd Cir.), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Grand Jury Proceedings
See also, In Re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973) in which Judge Friendly declared: “It is not asking too much to insist that if a client wishes to preserve the privilege under such circumstances, he must take some affirmative action to preserve confidentiality,” adding in a footnote: “Taking or failing to take precautions may be considered as bearing on intent” to preserve confidentiality.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,487, 15 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 428 in Re Grand Jury Proceedings
See also, In Re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973) in which Judge Friendly declared: "It is not asking too much to insist that if a client wishes to preserve the privilege under such circumstances, he must take some affirmative action to preserve confidentiality," adding in a footnote: "Taking or failing to take precautions may be considered as bearing on intent" to preserve confidentiality.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank Campanale v. David R. Harris, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
Compare Johnson v. Patterson, 475 F.2d 1066, 1068 (10th Cir.) (Cross-examining defendant about his post-arrest silence for impeachment purposes is a violation of his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 878 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973); United States v. Semensohn, 421 F.2d 1206, 1209 (2d Cir.1970) (same); United States v. Brin-son, 411 F.2d 1057 , 1060 (6th Cir.1969) (same) and Fowle v. United States, 410 F.2d 48, 51 (9th Cir.1969) (same) with United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leroy Basil McManaman
See also Johnson v. Patterson, 475 F.2d 1066, 1068 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 878 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of Grand Jury Empanelled February 14, 1978. Appeal of United States of America
See also In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 , 86-87 & nn. 19 & 20 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 26 (1973). 41 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert L. Twyman v. State of Oklahoma and Richard A. Crisp
See also, Johnson v. Patterson, 475 F.2d 1066 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied 414 U.S. 878 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Moore
While civilian courts have not always extended this principle to one of absolute proportions, see United States v. Hale, 422 U.S. 171 , 95 S.Ct. 2133 , 45 L.Ed.2d 99 (1975); compare United States v. Fairchild, 505 F.2d 1378 (5th Cir. 1975) and United States v. Ramirez, 441 F.2d 950 (5th Cir. 1971), with United States v. Anderson, 162 U.S.App.D.C. 305 , 498 F.2d 1038 (1974) and Johnson v. Patterson, 475 F.2d 1066 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 878 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973), none of the limiting conditions therein involved are applicable in the present case. .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nelson
Compare United States v. Fairchild, 505 F.2d 1378, 1382 (5th Cir. 1975) and United States v. Ramirez, 441 F.2d 950 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 869 , 92 S.Ct. 91 , 30 L.Ed.2d 113 (1971), with United States v. Anderson, 162 U.S.App.D.C. 305 , 498 F.2d 1038 (1974) and Johnson v. Patterson, 475 F.2d 1066 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 878 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Patterson, Warden
v.
Johnson
v.
Johnson
No. 72-1714.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.