Fed. Energy Admin. v. Algonquin SNG, Inc., 423 U.S. 923 (1975). · Go Syfert
Search
Fed. Energy Admin. v. Algonquin SNG, Inc., 423 U.S. 923 (1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
94 citation events across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wilson v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters (ca6, 1996-07-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Wilson v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters
6th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Butler v. Local 823, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 514 F.2d 442, 454 (8th Cir.), cert. denied 423 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 265 , 46 L.Ed.2d 249 (1975).
cited Cited "see" Wilson v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
6th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Butler v. Local 823, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 514 F.2d 442, 454 (8th Cir.), cert. denied 423 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 265 , 46 L.Ed.2d 249 (1975).
discussed Cited "see" Louis Vadino v. A. Valey Engineers
3rd Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gustafson v. Cornelius Co., 724 F.2d 75, 79 (8th Cir. 1983) (citing Butler v. Local Union 823, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 514 F.2d 442 , 449-50 & n. 11 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 265 , 46 L.Ed.2d 249 (1975). 11 The relevant statute of limitations question, therefore, is not only when Vadino knew, or should have known, that the employer breached the contract but also when he knew, or should have known, that further appeals to the Union would be futile.
discussed Cited "see" Reginald Childs v. Pennsylvania Federation Brotherhood of Maintenance Way Employees, and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
3rd Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Butler v. Local Union 823, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 514 F.2d 442 , 448 (8th Cir.1975) (quoting Abrams v. Carrier Corp., 434 F.2d 1234, 1252 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 265 , 46 L.Ed.2d 249 (1975).
discussed Cited "see" Paoletti v. Zlimen
Minn. Ct. App. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
Buchholtz v. Swift & Company, 62 F.R.D. 581, 604 (D.Minn.1973); see Butler v. Local Union 823, 514 F.2d 442 , 448 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 265 , 46 L.Ed.2d 249 (1975) (same state statute of limitations applies to claims against both unions and employers).
cited Cited "see" Vaughter v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
S.D. Fla. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Butler v. Local 823, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 514 F.2d 442 , 446 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 265 , 46 L.Ed.2d 249 (1975).
cited Cited "see" Lee O. Edwards, Jr. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 36, Building Material and Dump Truck Drivers
9th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Butler v. Local 823, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 514 F.2d 442 , 446 (8th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 265 , 46 L.Ed.2d 249 (1975).
discussed Cited "see" Smith v. Hussmann Refrigerator Company
8th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lynch v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 475 F.2d 764, 765 (5th Cir. 1973) 16 In Butler v. Local Union 823, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 514 F.2d 442 , 453 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 265 , 46 L.Ed.2d 249 (1975), we approved jury instructions defining the union's duty as "a legal duty fairly to represent the plaintiff without arbitrariness, discrimination, or bad faith * * * ." 1 In Mavis v. Brotherhood of Ry., Airline & S.S.
discussed Cited "see" Wallace v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
E.D.N.Y · 1978 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Butler v. Local 828, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 514 F.2d 442 , 447-48 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 265 , 46 L.Ed.2d 249 (1975); Grant v. Mulvihill Brothers Motor Service, Inc., 428 F.Supp. 45 (N.D.Ill.1976).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Edward Johnson v. Hussmann Corporation
8th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Butler v. Local 823, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 514 F.2d 442 , 449-50 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 265 , 46 L.Ed.2d 249 (1975).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Belic v. General Motors Corp.
S.D. Ohio · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Butler v. Teamsters Local 823, 514 F.2d 442 , 450 (8th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 265 , 47 L.Ed.2d 249 (1975).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Adkins v. General Motors Corp.
S.D. Ohio · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Butler v. Teamsters Local 823, 514 F.2d 442 , 450 (8th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 265 , 46 L.Ed.2d 249 (1975).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Systems Council U-19 & Local 841 v. Powell
Ala. · 1979 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Butler v. Local Union 823, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Etc., 514 F.2d 442 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 423 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 265 , 46 L.Ed.2d 249 (1975) with Sander- son v. Ford Motor Co., 483 F.2d 102 (5th Cir. 1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Pesola v. Inland Tool & Manufacturing, Inc.
E.D. Mich. · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Butler v. Teamsters, Local 828, 514 F.2d 442 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 265 , 46 L.Ed.2d 249 (1976) (limitations period governing contractual claims); Abrams, supra (case-by-case determination, looking to nature of the union’s alleged act of commission or omission; if claim against the union is that it failed to enforce plaintiff’s contractual rights, contracts statute governs); De Arroyo v. Sindicato de Trabajadores Packing, 425 F.2d 281 , 286-87 n.6 (1st Cir. 1970) (limitations period governing tort actions); Gray v. Heat and Frost Insulators, supr…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Federal Energy Administration
v.
Algonquin SNG, Inc.
No. 75-382.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 3, 1975.
423 U.S. 923
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. D. C. Cir. Cer-tiorari granted. In addition to question presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue applicability of the Anti-Injunction Act, 26 U. S. C. § 7421.